scispace - formally typeset
P

Peter Gronn

Researcher at University of Cambridge

Publications -  76
Citations -  7063

Peter Gronn is an academic researcher from University of Cambridge. The author has contributed to research in topics: Shared leadership & Transactional leadership. The author has an hindex of 28, co-authored 76 publications receiving 6701 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter Gronn include University of Glasgow & Monash University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis

TL;DR: In this paper, a taxonomy of distributed leadership is presented, in which a key defining criterion is conjoint agency, and a review of examples in the literature is provided. But the taxonomy is limited to three varieties of distributed action: concertive action, collaborative action, and collaborative action.
Journal ArticleDOI

Distributed Properties A New Architecture for Leadership

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the leadership of organizations is most appropriately understood as a distributed, rather than as a focused, phenomenon, and propose a reconceptualization of leadership.
Journal ArticleDOI

Leadership capacity in teams

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the state of the field regarding leadership in teams and present a perspective that considers leadership as an outcome of team processes that provides resources for better team adaptation and performance in subsequent performance cycles.
Book

The New Work of Educational Leaders: Changing Leadership Practice in an Era of School Reform

Peter Gronn
TL;DR: A Distributed View of Leadership The Disengagement of Leaders as discussed by the authors The Eology of LEADERSHIP What do Leaders Do? Leaders' Committees and Meetings Leadership Teams The Emotion of Leaders Leadership as Greedy Work
Journal ArticleDOI

The future of distributed leadership

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assess the empirical utility and conceptual significance of distributed leadership and argue that distributed leadership is largely unremarkable, especially in light of the continuity between current writings and those of early generation scholars.