P
Peter J.S. Jones
Researcher at University College London
Publications - 79
Citations - 4004
Peter J.S. Jones is an academic researcher from University College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Marine protected area & Corporate governance. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 78 publications receiving 3601 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter J.S. Jones include Heriot-Watt University & Pearson Education.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: Review of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues
Stelios Katsanevakis,Vanessa Stelzenmüller,Andy South,Thomas Kirk Sørensen,Peter J.S. Jones,Sandy Kerr,Fabio Badalamenti,Christos Anagnostou,Patricia Breen,Guillem Chust,Giovanni D’Anna,Michael Duijn,Tatiana Filatova,Fabio Fiorentino,Helena Hulsman,Kate R. Johnson,Aristomenis P. Karageorgis,Ingrid Kröncke,Simone Mirto,Carlo Pipitone,Susan Portelli,Wanfei Qiu,Henning Reiss,Dimitris Sakellariou,Maria Salomidi,Luc van Hoof,Vassiliki Vassilopoulou,Tomás Vega Fernández,Sandra Vöge,Anke Weber,Argyro Zenetos,Remment ter Hofstede +31 more
TL;DR: Ecosystem based marine spatial management (EB-MSM) is an approach that recognizes the full array of interactions within an ecosystem, including human uses, rather than considering single issues, species, or ecosystem services in isolation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground
TL;DR: Given the divergent values of different stakeholders, the high degree of scientific uncertainty, and the high marine resource management decisionstakes, it is concluded that a key challenge is to adopt a ``middle-ground'' approach which combines top-down and bottom-up approaches, and which is consistent with the post-normalscientific approach.
Journal ArticleDOI
Marine spatial planning in reality: Introduction to case studies and discussion of findings
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored the reality of marine spatial planning, drawing on 12 case studies around Europe, employing a structured qualitative empirical approach, concluding that top-down processes tend to dominate, more participative platforms tending to be disconnected by design from executive decision-making, despite growing indications that the target for Good Environmental Status (GES) by 2020 is unlikely to be met.
Journal ArticleDOI
The science of European marine reserves: Status, efficacy, and future needs
Phillip B. Fenberg,Jennifer E. Caselle,Joachim Claudet,Michaela Clemence,Steven D. Gaines,José Antonio García-Charton,Emanuel João Gonçalves,Kirsten Grorud-Colvert,Paolo Guidetti,Stuart R. Jenkins,Peter J.S. Jones,Sarah E. Lester,Robin M Mcallen,Even Moland,Serge Planes,Thomas Kirk Sørensen +15 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a synthesis of the ecological effects of existing European marine reserves and the factors underlying their effectiveness, and show that existing marine reserves foster significant positive increases in key biological variables (density, biomass, body size and species richness) compared with areas receiving less protection.
Journal ArticleDOI
The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe
Wanfei Qiu,Peter J.S. Jones +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide an overview of the emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in the European Union, which consists of four main categories of policy drivers: environmental legislation, legislation on marine renewable energy, fisheries regulations and the Integrated Maritime Policy.