Peter J. Weiden

Bio: Peter J. Weiden is an academic researcher from Alkermes. The author has contributed to research in topics: Antipsychotic & Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming). The author has an hindex of 51, co-authored 211 publications receiving 13587 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter J. Weiden include SUNY Downstate Medical Center & Mount Sinai St. Luke's and Mount Sinai Roosevelt.

Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: A Comprehensive Research Synthesis

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate and compare the effects of anti­psychotics—both the newer ones and the conventional ones—on body weight. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search identified 81 English- and non-English-language articles that included data on weight change in antipsychotic-treated patients. For each agent, a meta-analysis and random effects metaregression estimated the weight change after 10 weeks of treatment at a standard dose. A comprehensive narrative review was also conducted on all articles that did not yield quantitative information but did yield important qualitative information. RESULTS: Placebo was associated with a mean weight reduction of 0.74 kg. Among conventional agents, mean weight change ranged from a reduction of 0.39 kg with molindone to an increase of 3.19 kg with thioridazine. Among newer antipsychotic agents, mean increases were as follows: clozapine, 4.45 kg; olanzapine, 4.15 kg; sertindole, 2.92 kg; risperidone, 2.10 kg; and ziprasidone, 0.04 kg....

Cost of Relapse in Schizophrenia

Abstract: To estimate the national annual cost of rehospitalization for multiple-episode schizophrenia outpatients, and to determine the relative cost burden from loss of medication efficacy and from medication noncompliance, the yearly number of neuroleptic-responsive multiple-episode schizophrenia inpatients in the United States who are discharged back to outpatient treatment was estimated. The cohort at risk for future relapse and rehospitalization was determined. The research literature on the expected rates of relapse for schizophrenia patients on maintenance antipsychotic medication was reviewed; in particular, monthly relapse rates under the optimal medication conditions of compliant patients taking optimal doses of a depot neuroleptic (optimal neuroleptic dose) and under the less optimal conditions of patients stopping medication (medication noncompliant) was estimated. Using established noncompliance rates from the literature, it became possible to estimate a "real world" rehospitalization rate for this cohort, as well as the relative burden accruing from loss of medication efficacy and from medication noncompliance. Finally, cost estimates for index hospitalizations and rehospitalizations were derived from data on national expenditures for inpatient mental health care. The monthly relapse rates are estimated to be 3.5 percent per month for patients on maintenance neuroleptics and 11.0 percent per month for patients who have discontinued their medication. Postdischarge noncompliance rates in community settings are estimated to be 7.6 percent per month. These estimates were entered into a survival analysis model to determine the real world relapse rate of this cohort. An estimated 257,446 multiple-episode (> or = two hospitalizations) schizophrenia patients were discharged from short-stay (< or = 90 days) inpatient units in the United States during 1986. The estimated aggregate baseline inpatient cost for the index hospitalizations of this cohort was $2.3 billion (1993 dollars). Within 2 years after discharge, the aggregate cost of readmission approached $2 billion. Loss of neuroleptic efficacy accounted for roughly 60 percent of the rehospitalization costs and neuroleptic noncompliance for roughly 40 percent. The economic burden due to loss of efficacy is relatively higher during the first postdischarge year, whereas the burden from noncompliance is higher in the second year. Because loss of medication efficacy and medication noncompliance act synergistically on relapse, substantial inpatient cost savings can be realized by linking better pharmacologic treatments of schizophrenia with more effective strategies to manage medication noncompliance.

The expert consensus guideline series: adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness.

Abstract: Objectives Poor adherence to medication treatment can have devastating consequences for patients with mental illness. The goal of this project was to develop recommendations for addressing adherence problems to improve patient outcomes. Methods The editors identified important topics and questions concerning medication adherence problems in serious mental illness that are not fully addressed in the literature. A survey was developed containing 39 questions (521 options) asking about defining nonadherence, extent of adherence problems in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, risk factors for nonadherence, assessment methods, and interventions for specific types of adherence problems. The survey was completed by 41 (85%) of the 48 experts to whom it was sent. Results of the literature review and survey were used to develop recommendations for assessing and improving adherence in patients with serious mental illness. Results ASSESSING ADHERENCE: The experts endorsed percentage of medication not taken as the preferred method of defining adherence, with 80% or more of medication taken endorsed as an appropriate cut-off for adherence in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Although self- and physician report are the most common methods used to assess adherence in clinical settings, they are often inaccurate and may underestimate nonadherence. The experts recommend that, if possible, clinicians also use more objective measures (e.g., pill counts, pharmacy records, and, when appropriate, serum levels such as are used for lithium). Use of a validated self-report scale may help improve accuracy. Scope of the problem The majority of the experts believed the average patient with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder in their practices takes only 51%-70% of prescribed medication. FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NONADHERENCE: The experts endorsed poor insight and lack of illness awareness, distress associated with specific side effects or a general fear of side effects, inadequate efficacy with persistent symptoms, and believing medications are no longer needed as the most important factors leading to adherence problems in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The experts considered weight gain a side effect that is very likely to lead to adherence problems in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder; sedation was considered a more important contributor to adherence problems in bipolar disorder than schizophrenia. The experts rated persistent positive or negative symptoms in schizophrenia and persistent grandiosity and manic symptoms in bipolar disorder as the most important symptomatic contributors to adherence problems in these illnesses. Interventions It is important to identify the specific factors that may be contributing to a patient's adherence problems in order to customize interventions to target those problems. Multiple problems may be involved, requiring a combination of interventions. Conclusions Adherence problems are complex and multidetermined. The experts recommended customized interventions focused on the underlying causes.

Partial Compliance and Risk of Rehospitalization Among California Medicaid Patients With Schizophrenia

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between compliance with an antipsychotic medication regimen and risk of hospitalization in a cohort of California Medicaid patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Compliance behavior was estimated by using a retrospective review of California Medicaid pharmacy refill and medical claims for 4,325 outpatients for whom antipsychotics were prescribed for treatment of schizophrenia from 1999 to 2001. Compliance behavior was estimated by using four different definitions: gaps in medication therapy, medication consistency and persistence, and a medication possession ratio. Patients were followed for one year and had an average of 19.1 dispensing events. Logistic regression models using each compliance estimate were used to determine the odds of hospitalization. RESULTS: Risk of hospitalization was significantly correlated with compliance. With all definitions, lower compliance was associated with a greater risk of hospitalization over and abov...

Drug abuse in schizophrenic patients: clinical correlates and reasons for use.

Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to 1) determine substance abuse prevalence and preference in a diverse sample ofschizophrenic, schizoaffective, and schizophreniform inpatients, 2) cornpare drug-abusing and non-drug-abusing patients on demographic and clinical variables during the acute and stabilization phases of their hospital course, and 3) obtain data from patients on reasons for drug abuse and on acute state-related changes during periods of intoxication. Method: Eighty-three psychotic inpatients consecutively admitted to a New York City teaching hospital were evaluated. Sixty-eight had schizophrenia, 12 had schizoaffective disorder, and three had schizophreniforrn disorder diagnosed according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Each patient received ratings on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Global Assessment Scale, and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms at admission and at discharge, an evaluation of premorbid adjustment, and an extensive interview on drug and alcohol use. Results: Forty (48%) of the patients received diagnoses of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence. The drug-abusing patients primanly used cannabis (N=26), alcohol (N=2 1), and cocaine (N= I 4) and reported that they abused drugs to get “high, “ to relieve depression, and to relax. They had significantly fewer positive and negative symptoms at discharge, better sexual adjustment and worse school performance during adolescence, and more family histories ofdrug abuse than the non-d rugabusing patients. Conclusions: Schizophrenic patients who abuse drugs may represent a subgroup of patients with better prognoses and less severe clinical characteristics of schizophrenia, but their drug abuse may adversely affect global outcome.

Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia

Abstract: background The relative effectiveness of second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs as compared with that of older agents has been incompletely addressed, though newer agents are currently used far more commonly. We compared a first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine, with several newer drugs in a double-blind study. methods A total of 1493 patients with schizophrenia were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to receive olanzapine (7.5 to 30 mg per day), perphenazine (8 to 32 mg per day), quetiapine (200 to 800 mg per day), or risperidone (1.5 to 6.0 mg per day) for up to 18 months. Ziprasidone (40 to 160 mg per day) was included after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration. The primary aim was to delineate differences in the overall effectiveness of these five treatments. results Overall, 74 percent of patients discontinued the study medication before 18 months (1061 of the 1432 patients who received at least one dose): 64 percent of those assigned to olanzapine, 75 percent of those assigned to perphenazine, 82 percent of those assigned to quetiapine, 74 percent of those assigned to risperidone, and 79 percent of those assigned to ziprasidone. The time to the discontinuation of treatment for any cause was significantly longer in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (P<0.001) or risperidone (P=0.002) group, but not in the perphenazine (P=0.021) or ziprasidone (P=0.028) group. The times to discontinuation because of intolerable side effects were similar among the groups, but the rates differed (P=0.04); olanzapine was associated with more discontinuation for weight gain or metabolic effects, and perphenazine was associated with more discontinuation for extrapyramidal effects. conclusions The majority of patients in each group discontinued their assigned treatment owing to inefficacy or intolerable side effects or for other reasons. Olanzapine was the most effective in terms of the rates of discontinuation, and the efficacy of the conventional antipsychotic agent perphenazine appeared similar to that of quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Olanzapine was associated with greater weight gain and increases in measures of glucose and lipid metabolism.

How stigma interferes with mental health care.

Abstract: Many people who would benefit from mental health services opt not to pursue them or fail to fully participate once they have begun. One of the reasons for this disconnect is stigma; namely, to avoid the label of mental illness and the harm it brings, people decide not to seek or fully participate in care. Stigma yields 2 kinds of harm that may impede treatment participation: It diminishes self-esteem and robs people of social opportunities. Given the existing literature in this area, recommendations are reviewed for ongoing research that will more comprehensively expand understanding of the stigma-care seeking link. Implications for the development of antistigma programs that might promote care seeking and participation are also reviewed.

Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: A Comprehensive Research Synthesis

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate and compare the effects of anti­psychotics—both the newer ones and the conventional ones—on body weight. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search identified 81 English- and non-English-language articles that included data on weight change in antipsychotic-treated patients. For each agent, a meta-analysis and random effects metaregression estimated the weight change after 10 weeks of treatment at a standard dose. A comprehensive narrative review was also conducted on all articles that did not yield quantitative information but did yield important qualitative information. RESULTS: Placebo was associated with a mean weight reduction of 0.74 kg. Among conventional agents, mean weight change ranged from a reduction of 0.39 kg with molindone to an increase of 3.19 kg with thioridazine. Among newer antipsychotic agents, mean increases were as follows: clozapine, 4.45 kg; olanzapine, 4.15 kg; sertindole, 2.92 kg; risperidone, 2.10 kg; and ziprasidone, 0.04 kg....

A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia

Abstract: A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia has been derived that incorporates diagnostic criteria for pseudoakathisia, and mild, moderate, and severe akathisia. It comprises items for rating the observable, restless movements which characterise the condition, the subjective awareness of restlessness, and any distress associated with the akathisia. In addition, there is an item for rating global severity. A standard examination procedure is recommended. The inter-rater reliability for the scale items (Cohen's kappa) ranged from 0.738 to 0.955. Akathisia was found in eight of 42 schizophrenic in-patients, and nine had pseudoakathisia, where the typical sense of inner restlessness was not reported.