scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Petra M. G. Erkens

Bio: Petra M. G. Erkens is an academic researcher from Maastricht University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pulmonary embolism & Geneva score. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 42 publications receiving 2358 citations. Previous affiliations of Petra M. G. Erkens include Maastricht University Medical Centre & Public Health Research Institute.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
19 Mar 2014-JAMA
TL;DR: The combination of pretest clinical probability assessment with age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff was associated with a larger number of patients in whom PE could be considered ruled out with a low likelihood of subsequent clinical venous thromboembolism.
Abstract: RESULTS Of the 3346 patients with suspected PE included, the prevalence of PE was 19%. Among the 2898 patients with a nonhigh or an unlikely clinical probability, 817 patients (28.2%) had a D-dimer level lower than 500 μg/L (95% CI, 26.6%-29.9%) and 337 patients (11.6%) had a D-dimer between 500 μg/L and their age-adjusted cutoff (95% CI, 10.5%-12.9%). The 3-month failure rate in patients with a D-dimer level higher than 500 μg/L but below the age-adjusted cutoff was 1 of 331 patients (0.3% [95% CI, 0.1%-1.7%]). Among the 766 patients 75 years or older, of whom 673 had a nonhigh clinical probability, using the age-adjusted cutoff instead of the 500 μg/L cutoff increased the proportion of patients in whom PE could be excluded on the basis of D-dimer from 43 of 673 patients (6.4% [95% CI, 4.8%-8.5%) to 200 of 673 patients (29.7% [95% CI, 26.4%-33.3%), without any additional false-negative findings. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Compared with a fixed D-dimer cutoff of 500 μg/L, the combination of pretest clinical probability assessment with age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff was associated with a larger number of patients in whom PE could be considered ruled out with a low likelihood of subsequent clinical venous thromboembolism. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01134068

666 citations

Reference EntryDOI
TL;DR: Fixed dose LMWH is more effective and safer than adjusted dose UFH for the initial treatment of VTE, and significantly reduced the incidence of thrombotic complications, the occurrence of major haemorrhage during initial treatment and overall mortality at follow up.
Abstract: Background Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have been shown to be effective and safe in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE). They may also be effective for the initial treatment of VTE. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1999 and previously updated in 2004. Objectives To determine the effect of LMWH compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the initial treatment of VTE. Search methods Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Specialised Register and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library). Colleagues and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for additional information. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials comparing fixed dose subcutaneous LMWH with adjusted dose intravenous or subcutaneous UFH in people with VTE. Data collection and analysis Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion and quality, and extracted data independently. Main results Twenty-three studies were included (n = 9587). Thrombotic complications occurred in 3.6% of participants treated with LMWH compared with 5.3% treated with UFH (odds ratio (OR) 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.85). Thrombus size was reduced in 53% of participants treated with LMWH and 45% treated with UFH (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.81). Major haemorrhages occurred in 1.1% of participants treated with LMWH compared with 1.9% treated with UFH (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83). In 19 trials, 4.3% of participants treated with LMWH died compared with 5.8% of participants treated with UFH (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.93). Nine studies (n = 4451) examined proximal thrombosis, 2192 participants were treated with LMWH and 2259 with UFH. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant reductions favouring LMWH in thrombotic complications and major haemorrhage. By end of follow up, 80 (3.6%) participants treated with LMWH had thrombotic complications compared with 143 (6.3%) treated with UFH (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.75). Major haemorrhages occurred in 18 (1.0%) participants treated with LMWH compared with 37 (2.1%) treated with UFH (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.85). Nine studies showed a statistically significant reduction in mortality favouring LMWH. By the end of follow up, 3.3% (70/2094) of participants treated with LMWH had died and 5.3% (110/2063) treated with UFH. Authors' conclusions Fixed dose LMWH is more effective and safer than adjusted dose UFH for the initial treatment of VTE. Compared to UFH, LMWH significantly reduced the incidence of thrombotic complications, the occurrence of major haemorrhage during initial treatment and overall mortality at follow up.

436 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Clinical decision rules and gestalt can safely exclude PE when combined with sensitive d-dimer testing, and the authors recommend standardized rules because gestalt has lower specificity, but the choice of a particular rule and d-Dimer test depend on both prevalence and setting.
Abstract: This systematic review of 52 studies involving 55 268 patients compared gestalt (a physician's unstructured estimate) and clinical decision rules for evaluating adults with suspected pulmonary embo...

273 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: All 4 CDRs show similar performance for exclusion of acute PE in combination with a normal d-dimer result, and prospective validation indicates that the simplified scores may be used in clinical practice.
Abstract: Several clinical decision rules (CDRs) are available for evaluation of patients with possible pulmonary embolism (PE). It is not known which of these rules, if any, is best to use. In this multicen...

231 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
04 Oct 2012-BMJ
TL;DR: A Wells score of ≤4 combined with a negative qualitative D-dimer test result can safely and efficiently exclude pulmonary embolism in primary care.
Abstract: Objective To validate the use of the Wells clinical decision rule combined with a point of care D-dimer test to safely exclude pulmonary embolism in primary care. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Primary care across three different regions of the Netherlands (Amsterdam, Maastricht, and Utrecht). Participants 598 adults with suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care. Interventions Doctors scored patients according to the seven variables of the Wells rule and carried out a qualitative point of care D-dimer test. All patients were referred to secondary care and diagnosed according to local protocols. Pulmonary embolism was confirmed or refuted on the basis of a composite reference standard, including spiral computed tomography and three months’ follow-up. Main outcome measures Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity), proportion of patients at low risk (efficiency), number of missed patients with pulmonary embolism in low risk category (false negative rate), and the presence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, based on the composite reference standard, including events during the follow-up period of three months. Results Pulmonary embolism was present in 73 patients (prevalence 12.2%). On the basis of a threshold Wells score of ≤4 and a negative qualitative D-dimer test result, 272 of 598 patients were classified as low risk (efficiency 45.5%). Four cases of pulmonary embolism were observed in these 272 patients (false negative rate 1.5%, 95% confidence interval 0.4% to 3.7%). The sensitivity and specificity of this combined diagnostic approach was 94.5% (86.6% to 98.5%) and 51.0% (46.7% to 55.4%), respectively. Conclusion A Wells score of ≤4 combined with a negative qualitative D-dimer test result can safely and efficiently exclude pulmonary embolism in primary care.

139 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In virtually all medical domains, diagnostic and prognostic multivariable prediction models are being developed, validated, updated, and implemented with the aim to assist doctors and individuals in estimating probabilities and potentially influence their decision making.
Abstract: The TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis) Statement includes a 22-item checklist, which aims to improve the reporting of studies developing, validating, or updating a prediction model, whether for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used. This explanation and elaboration document describes the rationale; clarifies the meaning of each item; and discusses why transparent reporting is important, with a view to assessing risk of bias and clinical usefulness of the prediction model. Each checklist item of the TRIPOD Statement is explained in detail and accompanied by published examples of good reporting. The document also provides a valuable reference of issues to consider when designing, conducting, and analyzing prediction model studies. To aid the editorial process and help peer reviewers and, ultimately, readers and systematic reviewers of prediction model studies, it is recommended that authors include a completed checklist in their submission. The TRIPOD checklist can also be downloaded from www.tripod-statement.org.

2,982 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient, with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome.
Abstract: ACS : acute coronary syndrome AMPLIFY : Apixaban for the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis as First-line Therapy aPTT : activated partial thromboplastin time b.i.d. : bis in diem (twice daily) b.p.m. : beats per minute BNP : brain natriuretic peptide BP : blood pressure CI : confidence interval CO : cardiac output COPD : chronic obstructive pulmonary disease CPG : Committee for Practice Guidelines CRNM : clinically relevant non-major CT : computed tomographic/tomogram CTEPH : chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension CUS : compression venous ultrasonography DSA : digital subtraction angiography DVT : deep vein thrombosis ELISA : enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ESC : European Society of Cardiology H-FABP : heart-type fatty acid-binding protein HIT : heparin-induced thrombocytopenia HR : hazard ratio ICOPER : International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry ICRP : International Commission on Radiological Protection INR : international normalized ratio iPAH : idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension IVC : inferior vena cava LMWH : low molecular weight heparin LV : left ventricle/left ventricular MDCT : multi-detector computed tomographic (angiography) MRA : magnetic resonance angiography NGAL : neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin NOAC(s) : Non-vitamin K-dependent new oral anticoagulant(s) NT-proBNP : N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide o.d. : omni die (every day) OR : odds ratio PAH : pulmonary arterial hypertension PE : pulmonary embolism PEA : pulmonary endarterectomy PEITHO : Pulmonary EmbolIsm THrOmbolysis trial PESI : pulmonary embolism severity index PH : pulmonary hypertension PIOPED : Prospective Investigation On Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis PVR : pulmonary vascular resistance RIETE : Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad Thromboembolica venosa RR : relative risk rtPA : recombinant tissue plasminogen activator RV : right ventricle/ventricular SPECT : single photon emission computed tomography sPESI : simplified pulmonary embolism severity index TAPSE : tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion Tc : technetium TOE : transoesophageal echocardiography TTR : time in therapeutic range TV : tricuspid valve UFH : unfractionated heparin V/Q scan : ventilation–perfusion scintigraphy VKA : vitamin K antagonist(s) VTE : venous thromboembolism Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient, with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk-benefit-ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines and recommendations should help the health professionals to make decisions in their daily practice. However, the final decisions concerning an individual patient must be made by the responsible health professional(s) in consultation with the patient and caregiver as appropriate. A great number of Guidelines have …

2,113 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Guidelines summarize and evaluate available evidence with the aim of assisting health professionals in proposing the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition.
Abstract: Guidelines summarize and evaluate available evidence with the aim of assisting health professionals in proposing the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition. Guidelines and their recommendations should facilitate decision making of health professionals in their daily practice. However, the final decisions concerning an individual patient must be made by the responsible health professional(s) in consultation with the patient and caregiver as appropriate.

2,079 citations