scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Philipp Schlegel

Bio: Philipp Schlegel is an academic researcher from Laboratory of Molecular Biology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Connectome & Mushroom bodies. The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 47 publications receiving 1473 citations. Previous affiliations of Philipp Schlegel include University of Bonn & University of Cambridge.

Papers published on a yearly basis

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Louis K. Scheffer1, C. Shan Xu1, Michał Januszewski2, Zhiyuan Lu1, Zhiyuan Lu3, Shin-ya Takemura1, Kenneth J. Hayworth1, Gary B. Huang1, Kazunori Shinomiya1, Jeremy Maitlin-Shepard2, Stuart Berg1, Jody Clements1, Philip M Hubbard1, William T. Katz1, Lowell Umayam1, Ting Zhao1, David G. Ackerman1, Tim Blakely2, John A. Bogovic1, Tom Dolafi1, Dagmar Kainmueller1, Takashi Kawase1, Khaled Khairy1, Laramie Leavitt2, Peter H. Li2, Larry Lindsey2, Nicole Neubarth1, Donald J. Olbris1, Hideo Otsuna1, Eric T. Trautman1, Masayoshi Ito1, Masayoshi Ito4, Alexander Shakeel Bates5, Jens Goldammer1, Jens Goldammer6, Tanya Wolff1, Robert Svirskas1, Philipp Schlegel5, Erika Neace1, Christopher J Knecht1, Chelsea X Alvarado1, Dennis A Bailey1, Samantha Ballinger1, Jolanta A. Borycz3, Brandon S Canino1, Natasha Cheatham1, Michael A Cook1, Marisa Dreher1, Octave Duclos1, Bryon Eubanks1, Kelli Fairbanks1, Samantha Finley1, Nora Forknall1, Audrey Francis1, Gary Patrick Hopkins1, Emily M Joyce1, SungJin Kim1, Nicole A Kirk1, Julie Kovalyak1, Shirley Lauchie1, Alanna Lohff1, Charli Maldonado1, Emily A Manley1, Sari McLin3, Caroline Mooney1, Miatta Ndama1, Omotara Ogundeyi1, Nneoma Okeoma1, Christopher Ordish1, Nicholas Padilla1, Christopher Patrick1, Tyler Paterson1, Elliott E Phillips1, Emily M Phillips1, Neha Rampally1, Caitlin Ribeiro1, Madelaine K Robertson3, Jon Thomson Rymer1, Sean M Ryan1, Megan Sammons1, Anne K Scott1, Ashley L Scott1, Aya Shinomiya1, Claire Smith1, Kelsey Smith1, Natalie L Smith1, Margaret A Sobeski1, Alia Suleiman1, Jackie Swift1, Satoko Takemura1, Iris Talebi1, Dorota Tarnogorska3, Emily Tenshaw1, Temour Tokhi1, John J. Walsh1, Tansy Yang1, Jane Anne Horne3, Feng Li1, Ruchi Parekh1, Patricia K. Rivlin1, Vivek Jayaraman1, Marta Costa7, Gregory S.X.E. Jefferis7, Gregory S.X.E. Jefferis5, Kei Ito1, Kei Ito4, Kei Ito6, Stephan Saalfeld1, Reed A. George1, Ian A. Meinertzhagen1, Ian A. Meinertzhagen3, Gerald M. Rubin1, Harald F. Hess1, Viren Jain2, Stephen M. Plaza1 
07 Sep 2020-eLife
TL;DR: Improved methods are summarized and the circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is presented, reducing the effort needed to answer circuit questions and providing procedures linking the neurons defined by the analysis with genetic reagents.
Abstract: Animal brains of all sizes, from the smallest to the largest, work in broadly similar ways. Studying the brain of any one animal in depth can thus reveal the general principles behind the workings of all brains. The fruit fly Drosophila is a popular choice for such research. With about 100,000 neurons – compared to some 86 billion in humans – the fly brain is small enough to study at the level of individual cells. But it nevertheless supports a range of complex behaviors, including navigation, courtship and learning. Thanks to decades of research, scientists now have a good understanding of which parts of the fruit fly brain support particular behaviors. But exactly how they do this is often unclear. This is because previous studies showing the connections between cells only covered small areas of the brain. This is like trying to understand a novel when all you can see is a few isolated paragraphs. To solve this problem, Scheffer, Xu, Januszewski, Lu, Takemura, Hayworth, Huang, Shinomiya et al. prepared the first complete map of the entire central region of the fruit fly brain. The central brain consists of approximately 25,000 neurons and around 20 million connections. To prepare the map – or connectome – the brain was cut into very thin 8nm slices and photographed with an electron microscope. A three-dimensional map of the neurons and connections in the brain was then reconstructed from these images using machine learning algorithms. Finally, Scheffer et al. used the new connectome to obtain further insights into the circuits that support specific fruit fly behaviors. The central brain connectome is freely available online for anyone to access. When used in combination with existing methods, the map will make it easier to understand how the fly brain works, and how and why it can fail to work correctly. Many of these findings will likely apply to larger brains, including our own. In the long run, studying the fly connectome may therefore lead to a better understanding of the human brain and its disorders. Performing a similar analysis on the brain of a small mammal, by scaling up the methods here, will be a likely next step along this path.

546 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
14 Dec 2020-eLife
TL;DR: This work identifies new components of the MB circuit in Drosophila, including extensive visual input and MB output neurons (MBONs) with direct connections to descending neurons, and provides insights into the circuitry used to integrate MB outputs, connectivity between the MB and the central complex and inputs to DANs, including feedback from MBONs.
Abstract: Making inferences about the computations performed by neuronal circuits from synapse-level connectivity maps is an emerging opportunity in neuroscience. The mushroom body (MB) is well positioned for developing and testing such an approach due to its conserved neuronal architecture, recently completed dense connectome, and extensive prior experimental studies of its roles in learning, memory, and activity regulation. Here, we identify new components of the MB circuit in Drosophila, including extensive visual input and MB output neurons (MBONs) with direct connections to descending neurons. We find unexpected structure in sensory inputs, in the transfer of information about different sensory modalities to MBONs, and in the modulation of that transfer by dopaminergic neurons (DANs). We provide insights into the circuitry used to integrate MB outputs, connectivity between the MB and the central complex and inputs to DANs, including feedback from MBONs. Our results provide a foundation for further theoretical and experimental work.

194 citations

Posted ContentDOI
C.S. Xu, Michał Januszewski1, Zhiyuan Lu2, Shin-ya Takemura, Kenneth J. Hayworth, Gary B. Huang, Kazunori Shinomiya, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard1, David G. Ackerman, Stuart Berg, Tim Blakely1, John A. Bogovic, Jody Clements, Tom Dolafi, Philip M Hubbard, Dagmar Kainmueller, William T. Katz, Takashi Kawase, Khaled Khairy3, Laramie Leavitt1, Peter H. Li1, Laurence F. Lindsey1, Nicole Neubarth, Donald J. Olbris, Hideo Otsuna, E.T. Troutman, Lowell Umayam, Ting Zhao, Mutsumi Ito4, Jens Goldammer5, Tanya Wolff, Robert Svirskas, Philipp Schlegel6, Erika Neace, Christopher J Knecht, Chelsea X Alvarado, Dennis A Bailey, Samantha Ballinger, Jolanta A. Borycz2, Brandon S Canino, Natasha Cheatham, Michael A Cook, Marisa Dreher, Octave Duclos, Bryon Eubanks, Kelli Fairbanks, Samantha Finley, Nora Forknall, Audrey Francis, Gary Patrick Hopkins, Emily M Joyce, SungJin Kim, Nicole A Kirk, Julie Kovalyak, Shirley Lauchie, Alanna Lohff, Charli Maldonado, Emily A Manley, Sari McLin2, Caroline Mooney, Miatta Ndama, Omotara Ogundeyi, Nneoma Okeoma, Christopher Ordish, Nicholas Padilla, Christopher Patrick, Tyler Paterson, Elliott E Phillips, Emily M Phillips, Neha Rampally, Caitlin Ribeiro, Madelaine K Robertson2, Jon Thomson Rymer, Sean M Ryan, Megan Sammons, Anne K Scott, Ashley L Scott, Aya Shinomiya, Claire Smith, Kimothy L. Smith, Natalie L Smith, Sobeski, Alia Suleiman, Jackie Swift, Iris Talebi, Dorota Tarnogorska2, Emily Tenshaw, Temour Tokhi, John J. Walsh, Tansy Yang, Jane Anne Horne2, Feng Li, Ruchi Parekh, Patricia K. Rivlin, Vivek Jayaraman, Kei K. Ito5, Kei K. Ito4, Stephan Saalfeld, Reed A. George, Ian A. Meinertzhagen2, Gerald M. Rubin, Harald F. Hess, Louis K. Scheffer, Viren Jain1, Stephen M. Plaza 
21 Jan 2020-bioRxiv
TL;DR: New methods are summarized and the complete circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of a much more complex animal, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, is presented, reducing the effort needed to answer typical circuit questions.
Abstract: The neural circuits responsible for behavior remain largely unknown. Previous efforts have reconstructed the complete circuits of small animals, with hundreds of neurons, and selected circuits for larger animals. Here we (the FlyEM project at Janelia and collaborators at Google) summarize new methods and present the complete circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of a much more complex animal, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Improved methods include new procedures to prepare, image, align, segment, find synapses, and proofread such large data sets; new methods that define cell types based on connectivity in addition to morphology; and new methods to simplify access to a large and evolving data set. From the resulting data we derive a better definition of computational compartments and their connections; an exhaustive atlas of cell examples and types, many of them novel; detailed circuits for most of the central brain; and exploration of the statistics and structure of different brain compartments, and the brain as a whole. We make the data public, with a web site and resources specifically designed to make it easy to explore, for all levels of expertise from the expert to the merely curious. The public availability of these data, and the simplified means to access it, dramatically reduces the effort needed to answer typical circuit questions, such as the identity of upstream and downstream neural partners, the circuitry of brain regions, and to link the neurons defined by our analysis with genetic reagents that can be used to study their functions. Note: In the next few weeks, we will release a series of papers with more involved discussions. One paper will detail the hemibrain reconstruction with more extensive analysis and interpretation made possible by this dense connectome. Another paper will explore the central complex, a brain region involved in navigation, motor control, and sleep. A final paper will present insights from the mushroom body, a center of multimodal associative learning in the fly brain.

162 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
18 Oct 2018-Cell
TL;DR: It is shown that extinction of aversive memories in Drosophila requires specific dopaminergic neurons, which indicate that omission of punishment is remembered as a positive experience, and extinction-evoked plasticity in a pair of neurons neutralizes the potentiated odor response imposed in the network by aversive learning.

159 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
14 Apr 2020-eLife
TL;DR: The natverse is an easy-to-use environment for neuroscientists to solve complex, large-scale analysis challenges as well as an open platform to create new code and packages to share with the community.
Abstract: To analyse neuron data at scale, neuroscientists expend substantial effort reading documentation, installing dependencies and moving between analysis and visualisation environments. To facilitate this, we have developed a suite of interoperable open-source R packages called the natverse . The natverse allows users to read local and remote data, perform popular analyses including visualisation and clustering and graph-theoretic analysis of neuronal branching. Unlike most tools, the natverse enables comparison across many neurons of morphology and connectivity after imaging or co-registration within a common template space. The natverse also enables transformations between different template spaces and imaging modalities. We demonstrate tools that integrate the vast majority of Drosophila neuroanatomical light microscopy and electron microscopy connectomic datasets. The natverse is an easy-to-use environment for neuroscientists to solve complex, large-scale analysis challenges as well as an open platform to create new code and packages to share with the community.

128 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
06 Jun 1986-JAMA
TL;DR: The editors have done a masterful job of weaving together the biologic, the behavioral, and the clinical sciences into a single tapestry in which everyone from the molecular biologist to the practicing psychiatrist can find and appreciate his or her own research.
Abstract: I have developed "tennis elbow" from lugging this book around the past four weeks, but it is worth the pain, the effort, and the aspirin. It is also worth the (relatively speaking) bargain price. Including appendixes, this book contains 894 pages of text. The entire panorama of the neural sciences is surveyed and examined, and it is comprehensive in its scope, from genomes to social behaviors. The editors explicitly state that the book is designed as "an introductory text for students of biology, behavior, and medicine," but it is hard to imagine any audience, interested in any fragment of neuroscience at any level of sophistication, that would not enjoy this book. The editors have done a masterful job of weaving together the biologic, the behavioral, and the clinical sciences into a single tapestry in which everyone from the molecular biologist to the practicing psychiatrist can find and appreciate his or

7,563 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
26 Jul 2018-Cell
TL;DR: Recon reconstructions of the entire brain of an adult female fly show that this freely available EM volume supports mapping of brain-spanning circuits, which will significantly accelerate Drosophila neuroscience.

650 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Louis K. Scheffer1, C. Shan Xu1, Michał Januszewski2, Zhiyuan Lu1, Zhiyuan Lu3, Shin-ya Takemura1, Kenneth J. Hayworth1, Gary B. Huang1, Kazunori Shinomiya1, Jeremy Maitlin-Shepard2, Stuart Berg1, Jody Clements1, Philip M Hubbard1, William T. Katz1, Lowell Umayam1, Ting Zhao1, David G. Ackerman1, Tim Blakely2, John A. Bogovic1, Tom Dolafi1, Dagmar Kainmueller1, Takashi Kawase1, Khaled Khairy1, Laramie Leavitt2, Peter H. Li2, Larry Lindsey2, Nicole Neubarth1, Donald J. Olbris1, Hideo Otsuna1, Eric T. Trautman1, Masayoshi Ito4, Masayoshi Ito1, Alexander Shakeel Bates5, Jens Goldammer1, Jens Goldammer6, Tanya Wolff1, Robert Svirskas1, Philipp Schlegel5, Erika Neace1, Christopher J Knecht1, Chelsea X Alvarado1, Dennis A Bailey1, Samantha Ballinger1, Jolanta A. Borycz3, Brandon S Canino1, Natasha Cheatham1, Michael A Cook1, Marisa Dreher1, Octave Duclos1, Bryon Eubanks1, Kelli Fairbanks1, Samantha Finley1, Nora Forknall1, Audrey Francis1, Gary Patrick Hopkins1, Emily M Joyce1, SungJin Kim1, Nicole A Kirk1, Julie Kovalyak1, Shirley Lauchie1, Alanna Lohff1, Charli Maldonado1, Emily A Manley1, Sari McLin3, Caroline Mooney1, Miatta Ndama1, Omotara Ogundeyi1, Nneoma Okeoma1, Christopher Ordish1, Nicholas Padilla1, Christopher Patrick1, Tyler Paterson1, Elliott E Phillips1, Emily M Phillips1, Neha Rampally1, Caitlin Ribeiro1, Madelaine K Robertson3, Jon Thomson Rymer1, Sean M Ryan1, Megan Sammons1, Anne K Scott1, Ashley L Scott1, Aya Shinomiya1, Claire Smith1, Kelsey Smith1, Natalie L Smith1, Margaret A Sobeski1, Alia Suleiman1, Jackie Swift1, Satoko Takemura1, Iris Talebi1, Dorota Tarnogorska3, Emily Tenshaw1, Temour Tokhi1, John J. Walsh1, Tansy Yang1, Jane Anne Horne3, Feng Li1, Ruchi Parekh1, Patricia K. Rivlin1, Vivek Jayaraman1, Marta Costa7, Gregory S.X.E. Jefferis5, Gregory S.X.E. Jefferis7, Kei Ito4, Kei Ito1, Kei Ito6, Stephan Saalfeld1, Reed A. George1, Ian A. Meinertzhagen3, Ian A. Meinertzhagen1, Gerald M. Rubin1, Harald F. Hess1, Viren Jain2, Stephen M. Plaza1 
07 Sep 2020-eLife
TL;DR: Improved methods are summarized and the circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is presented, reducing the effort needed to answer circuit questions and providing procedures linking the neurons defined by the analysis with genetic reagents.
Abstract: Animal brains of all sizes, from the smallest to the largest, work in broadly similar ways. Studying the brain of any one animal in depth can thus reveal the general principles behind the workings of all brains. The fruit fly Drosophila is a popular choice for such research. With about 100,000 neurons – compared to some 86 billion in humans – the fly brain is small enough to study at the level of individual cells. But it nevertheless supports a range of complex behaviors, including navigation, courtship and learning. Thanks to decades of research, scientists now have a good understanding of which parts of the fruit fly brain support particular behaviors. But exactly how they do this is often unclear. This is because previous studies showing the connections between cells only covered small areas of the brain. This is like trying to understand a novel when all you can see is a few isolated paragraphs. To solve this problem, Scheffer, Xu, Januszewski, Lu, Takemura, Hayworth, Huang, Shinomiya et al. prepared the first complete map of the entire central region of the fruit fly brain. The central brain consists of approximately 25,000 neurons and around 20 million connections. To prepare the map – or connectome – the brain was cut into very thin 8nm slices and photographed with an electron microscope. A three-dimensional map of the neurons and connections in the brain was then reconstructed from these images using machine learning algorithms. Finally, Scheffer et al. used the new connectome to obtain further insights into the circuits that support specific fruit fly behaviors. The central brain connectome is freely available online for anyone to access. When used in combination with existing methods, the map will make it easier to understand how the fly brain works, and how and why it can fail to work correctly. Many of these findings will likely apply to larger brains, including our own. In the long run, studying the fly connectome may therefore lead to a better understanding of the human brain and its disorders. Performing a similar analysis on the brain of a small mammal, by scaling up the methods here, will be a likely next step along this path.

546 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
03 Jan 2020-Science
TL;DR: It is suggested that once formed, an engram may exist in different states on the basis of their retrievability, and increased intrinsic excitability and synaptic plasticity work hand in hand to form engrams, and these mechanisms are also implicated in memory consolidation and retrieval processes.
Abstract: In 1904, Richard Semon introduced the term "engram" to describe the neural substrate for storing memories. An experience, Semon proposed, activates a subset of cells that undergo off-line, persistent chemical and/or physical changes to become an engram. Subsequent reactivation of this engram induces memory retrieval. Although Semon's contributions were largely ignored in his lifetime, new technologies that allow researchers to image and manipulate the brain at the level of individual neurons has reinvigorated engram research. We review recent progress in studying engrams, including an evaluation of evidence for the existence of engrams, the importance of intrinsic excitability and synaptic plasticity in engrams, and the lifetime of an engram. Together, these findings are beginning to define an engram as the basic unit of memory.

457 citations