scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Pisake Lumbiganon

Bio: Pisake Lumbiganon is an academic researcher from Khon Kaen University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Pregnancy. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 21 publications receiving 2507 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A multicentre randomised controlled trial that compared the standard model of antenatal care with a new model that emphasises actions known to be effective in improving maternal or neonatal outcomes and has fewer clinic visits is presented in this paper.

617 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: High coverage of essential interventions did not imply reduced maternal mortality in the health-care facilities the authors studied, and the maternal severity index (MSI) had good accuracy for maternal death prediction in women with markers of organ dysfunction.

533 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To assess the association between advanced maternal age (AMA) and adverse pregnancy outcomes, a large number of women under the age of 40 were surveyed for the first time and the results indicated a positive association betweenAMA and pregnancy outcomes.

313 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Between 2003 and 2009, haemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, and sepsis were responsible for more than half of maternal deaths worldwide, and more than a quarter of deaths were attributable to indirect causes.

3,976 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
18 Mar 2004-BMJ
TL;DR: This paper provides updated and extended guidance, based on the 2010 version of the CONSORT statement and the 2008consORT statement for the reporting of abstracts, on how to report the results of cluster randomised controlled trials.
Abstract: The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was developed to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials. It was initially published in 1996 and focused on the reporting of parallel group randomised controlled trials. The statement was revised in 2001, with a further update in 2010. A separate CONSORT statement for the reporting of abstracts was published in 2008. In earlier papers we considered the implications of the 2001 version of the CONSORT statement for the reporting of cluster randomised trial. In this paper we provide updated and extended guidance, based on the 2010 version of the CONSORT statement and the 2008 CONSORT statement for the reporting of abstracts.

2,655 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
08 Mar 2006-JAMA
TL;DR: An updated extension of the CONSORT checklist for reporting noninferiority and equivalence trials is presented, based on the 2010 version of theconsORT Statement and the 2008 CONSORT Statement for the reporting of abstracts, and illustrative examples and explanations for those items that differ from the main 2010consORT checklist are provided.
Abstract: The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement, including a checklist and a flow diagram, was developed to help authors improve their reporting of randomized controlled trials. Its primary focus was on individually randomized trials with 2 parallel groups that assess the possible superiority of one treatment compared with another but is now being extended to other trial designs. Noninferiority and equivalence trials have methodological features that differ from superiority trials and present particular difficulties in design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation. Although the rationale for such trials occurs frequently, those designed and described specifically as noninferiority or equivalence trials appear less commonly in the medical literature. The quality of reporting of those that are published is often inadequate. In this article, we present an adapted CONSORT checklist for reporting noninferiority and equivalence trials and provide illustrative examples and explanations for those items amended from the original CONSORT checklist. The intent is to improve reporting of noninferiority and equivalence trials, enabling readers to assess the validity of their results and conclusions.

1,858 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that despite the complexity of knowing what works in terms of reducing maternal mortality, only a few strategic choices need to be made to reduce maternal mortality.

1,611 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
05 Feb 2016-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: The use of CS worldwide has increased to unprecedented levels although the gap between higher- and lower-resource settings remains.
Abstract: Background Caesarean section (CS) rates continue to evoke worldwide concern because of their steady increase, lack of consensus on the appropriate CS rate and the associated additional short- and long-term risks and costs. We present the latest CS rates and trends over the last 24 years. Methods We collected nationally-representative data on CS rates between 1990 to 2014 and calculated regional and subregional weighted averages. We conducted a longitudinal analysis calculating differences in CS rates as absolute change and as the average annual rate of increase (AARI). Results According to the latest data from 150 countries, currently 18.6% of all births occur by CS, ranging from 6% to 27.2% in the least and most developed regions, respectively. Latin America and the Caribbean region has the highest CS rates (40.5%), followed by Northern America (32.3%), Oceania (31.1%), Europe (25%), Asia (19.2%) and Africa (7.3%). Based on the data from 121 countries, the trend analysis showed that between 1990 and 2014, the global average CS rate increased 12.4% (from 6.7% to 19.1%) with an average annual rate of increase of 4.4%. The largest absolute increases occurred in Latin America and the Caribbean (19.4%, from 22.8% to 42.2%), followed by Asia (15.1%, from 4.4% to 19.5%), Oceania (14.1%, from 18.5% to 32.6%), Europe (13.8%, from 11.2% to 25%), Northern America (10%, from 22.3% to 32.3%) and Africa (4.5%, from 2.9% to 7.4%). Asia and Northern America were the regions with the highest and lowest average annual rate of increase (6.4% and 1.6%, respectively). Conclusion The use of CS worldwide has increased to unprecedented levels although the gap between higher- and lower-resource settings remains. The information presented is essential to inform policy and global and regional strategies aimed at optimizing the use of CS.

1,461 citations