scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Qi Zhang

Bio: Qi Zhang is an academic researcher from Fudan University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Ultrasound. The author has an hindex of 20, co-authored 100 publications receiving 1563 citations. Previous affiliations of Qi Zhang include Minjiang University & Duke University.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2018
TL;DR: The opportunities and challenges caused by AI in education are analyzed and the focus is on the role of AI, which is difficult to separate from other technology-driven changes, especially in the discussion about work life.
Abstract: As the progressive ladder for human society, education aims at ensuring cultural heritage and social development. More importantly, it may inspire human imagination. In this sense, education is very critical in the development of a nation and even in the whole human society. Education will vary with different times in its concepts, contents and modes and accumulate energy for the transformation of social patterns. Now, AI has been used in nearly all the industries and trades, posing a powerful impetus in promoting economic development and social progress. The in-depth development of AI will be bound to accelerate the process of social order restructuring, ensure the harmonious coexistence between mankind and nature, coordinate the development man and science and bring unprecedented development opportunities as well as challenges to education. In intelligence age, with more and more educational resources available, more flexible modes and patterns and multivariant intelligence systems in teaching, great changes will take place in education, during which people may acquire knowledge in the forms of clustering and individual education and their ability will be greatly improved. Meanwhile, the new topics will emerge on how to enlighten people’s mind, how to reforge their values and how to tap their potential.

11 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
18 Jul 2018
TL;DR: A multiple empirical kernel mapping (MEKM) based BLS (MEkM-BLS) algorithm, which adopts MEKM to map the data of feature nodes to enhancement nodes, which has more meaningful enhancement layer in feedforward neural network.
Abstract: Transcranial sonography (TCS) has become more popular for diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD), and the TCS-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for PD also attracts considerable attention, in which classifier is a critical component. Broad learning system (BLS) is a newly proposed single layer feedforward neural network for classification. In BLS, the original input features are mapped to several new feature representations to form the feature nodes, and then these mapped features are expanded to enhancement nodes by random mapping in a wide sense. However, random mapping performed for enhancement nodes is too simple and the generated features lack interpretability together with relative low representation. In this work, we propose a multiple empirical kernel mapping (MEKM) based BLS (MEKM-BLS) algorithm, which adopts MEKM to map the data of feature nodes to enhancement nodes. MEKM-BLS then has more meaningful enhancement layer in feedforward neural network. Moreover, the experiment for PD diagnosis with TCS shows that MEKM-BLS achieves superior performance to the original BLS algorithm.

11 citations

Book ChapterDOI
Xiao Zheng1, Jun Shi1, Shihui Ying1, Qi Zhang1, Yan Li2 
17 Oct 2016
TL;DR: Experimental results on two neuroimaging datasets show that LUPI-based algorithms are superior to the traditional classifier models for single-modal neuroim imaging based diagnosis of brain disorders, and the proposed boosted LUPi framework achieves best performance.
Abstract: In clinical practice, it is more prevalent to use only a single-modal neuroimaging for diagnosis of brain disorders, such as structural magnetic resonance imaging. A neuroimaging dataset generally suffers from the small-sample-size problem, which makes it difficult to train a robust and effective classifier. The learning using privileged information (LUPI) is a newly proposed paradigm, in which the privileged information is available only at the training phase to provide additional information about training samples, but unavailable in the testing phase. LUPI can effectively help construct a better predictive rule to promote classification performance. In this paper, we propose to apply LUPI for the single-modal neuroimaging based diagnosis of brain diseases along with multi-modal training data. Moreover, a boosted LUPI framework is developed, which performs LUPI-based random subspace learning and then ensembles all the LUPI classifiers with the multiple kernel boosting (MKB) algorithm. The experimental results on two neuroimaging datasets show that LUPI-based algorithms are superior to the traditional classifier models for single-modal neuroimaging based diagnosis of brain disorders, and the proposed boosted LUPI framework achieves best performance.

11 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Qi Zhang1, Yue Liu1, Hong Han2, Jun Shi1, Wenping Wang2 
TL;DR: The AI architecture for CEUS feature extraction and classification using the point-wise gated Boltzmann machine shows promising classification results, and it may be potentially used in clinical diagnosis for cervical lymph node malignancy.
Abstract: This paper aims to build an artificial intelligence (AI) architecture for automated extraction of learned-from-data image features from contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) videos and to evaluate the AI architecture for classification between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. An AI architecture for CEUS feature extraction and classification was constructed by using the point-wise gated Boltzmann machine (PGBM). The PGBM consisted of task-relevant and task-irrelevant hidden units for both feature learning and feature selection, and the task-relevant units were connected to the support vector machine (SVM) to yield the likelihood for classification. The synthetic minority over-sampling technique was used to improve the classification ability for an unbalanced data set. Experimental evaluation was performed with the five-fold cross validation on a database of 127 lymph nodes (39 benign and 88 malignant) from 88 patients. The SVM likelihood exhibited a significant difference between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes (0.74 ± 0.21 versus 0.33 ± 0.28, $p ). On the test set, the accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and Youden’s index of the AI architecture were 82.55%, 89.58%, 84.75%, 77.56%, and 62.32%, respectively. The AI architecture using the PGBM shows promising classification results, and it may be potentially used in clinical diagnosis for cervical lymph node malignancy.

10 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
18 Jul 2018
TL;DR: Experimental results show that the proposed MRBM-MEKLM algorithm outperforms all the compared algorithms, suggesting the effectiveness of the proposed LUPI-based CAD for liver cancer.
Abstract: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a valuable imaging modality for diagnosis of liver cancers. However, the complexity of CEUS-based diagnosis limits its wide application, and the B-mode ultrasound (BUS) is still the most popular diagnosis modality in clinical practice. In order to promote BUS-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for liver cancers, we propose a learning using privileged information (LUPI) based CAD with BUS as the diagnosis modality and CEUS as PI. Particularly, the multimodal restricted Boltzmann machine (MRBM) works as a LUPI paradigm. That is, one BUS image and three CEUS images from the arterial phase, portal venous phase and delayed phase, respectively, are used to train three multimodal restricted Boltzmann machine (MRBM) models during training stage, but only the BUS data will be fed to MRBM to generate new feature representation at testing phase. A multiple empirical kernel learning machine (MEKLM) classifier is then performed on three new feature vectors from three MRBM models for classification of liver cancers. The experimental results show that the proposed MRBM-MEKLM algorithm outperforms all the compared algorithms, suggesting the effectiveness of the proposed LUPI-based CAD for liver cancer.

10 citations


Cited by
More filters
Christopher M. Bishop1
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Probability distributions of linear models for regression and classification are given in this article, along with a discussion of combining models and combining models in the context of machine learning and classification.
Abstract: Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.

10,141 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper reviews the major deep learning concepts pertinent to medical image analysis and summarizes over 300 contributions to the field, most of which appeared in the last year, to survey the use of deep learning for image classification, object detection, segmentation, registration, and other tasks.

8,730 citations

01 Jan 2020
TL;DR: Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.
Abstract: Summary Background Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described. Methods In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death. Findings 191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients). Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03–1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61–12·23; p Interpretation The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage. Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future. Funding Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.

4,408 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the long-term health consequences of patients with COVID-19 who have been discharged from hospital and investigate the associated risk factors, in particular disease severity.

2,933 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
07 Apr 2020-BMJ
TL;DR: Proposed models for covid-19 are poorly reported, at high risk of bias, and their reported performance is probably optimistic, according to a review of published and preprint reports.
Abstract: Objective To review and appraise the validity and usefulness of published and preprint reports of prediction models for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in patients with suspected infection, for prognosis of patients with covid-19, and for detecting people in the general population at increased risk of covid-19 infection or being admitted to hospital with the disease. Design Living systematic review and critical appraisal by the COVID-PRECISE (Precise Risk Estimation to optimise covid-19 Care for Infected or Suspected patients in diverse sEttings) group. Data sources PubMed and Embase through Ovid, up to 1 July 2020, supplemented with arXiv, medRxiv, and bioRxiv up to 5 May 2020. Study selection Studies that developed or validated a multivariable covid-19 related prediction model. Data extraction At least two authors independently extracted data using the CHARMS (critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies) checklist; risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST (prediction model risk of bias assessment tool). Results 37 421 titles were screened, and 169 studies describing 232 prediction models were included. The review identified seven models for identifying people at risk in the general population; 118 diagnostic models for detecting covid-19 (75 were based on medical imaging, 10 to diagnose disease severity); and 107 prognostic models for predicting mortality risk, progression to severe disease, intensive care unit admission, ventilation, intubation, or length of hospital stay. The most frequent types of predictors included in the covid-19 prediction models are vital signs, age, comorbidities, and image features. Flu-like symptoms are frequently predictive in diagnostic models, while sex, C reactive protein, and lymphocyte counts are frequent prognostic factors. Reported C index estimates from the strongest form of validation available per model ranged from 0.71 to 0.99 in prediction models for the general population, from 0.65 to more than 0.99 in diagnostic models, and from 0.54 to 0.99 in prognostic models. All models were rated at high or unclear risk of bias, mostly because of non-representative selection of control patients, exclusion of patients who had not experienced the event of interest by the end of the study, high risk of model overfitting, and unclear reporting. Many models did not include a description of the target population (n=27, 12%) or care setting (n=75, 32%), and only 11 (5%) were externally validated by a calibration plot. The Jehi diagnostic model and the 4C mortality score were identified as promising models. Conclusion Prediction models for covid-19 are quickly entering the academic literature to support medical decision making at a time when they are urgently needed. This review indicates that almost all pubished prediction models are poorly reported, and at high risk of bias such that their reported predictive performance is probably optimistic. However, we have identified two (one diagnostic and one prognostic) promising models that should soon be validated in multiple cohorts, preferably through collaborative efforts and data sharing to also allow an investigation of the stability and heterogeneity in their performance across populations and settings. Details on all reviewed models are publicly available at https://www.covprecise.org/. Methodological guidance as provided in this paper should be followed because unreliable predictions could cause more harm than benefit in guiding clinical decisions. Finally, prediction model authors should adhere to the TRIPOD (transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis) reporting guideline. Systematic review registration Protocol https://osf.io/ehc47/, registration https://osf.io/wy245. Readers’ note This article is a living systematic review that will be updated to reflect emerging evidence. Updates may occur for up to two years from the date of original publication. This version is update 3 of the original article published on 7 April 2020 (BMJ 2020;369:m1328). Previous updates can be found as data supplements (https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1328/related#datasupp). When citing this paper please consider adding the update number and date of access for clarity.

2,183 citations