scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

R. Nesbakken

Bio: R. Nesbakken is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Multicenter trial. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 395 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
15 Feb 1981-Cancer
TL;DR: Patients in Group 3 deteriorated faster than patients in Groups 1 and 2, and Bleomycin had no positive or negative influence on survival.
Abstract: In a controlled, prospective, randomized investigation, started in 1974, 118 patients with supratentorial astrocytoma Grade III--IV were divided into three groups. Groups 1 and 2 received 45 Gy postoperatively to the whole supratentorial brain. Bleomycin in 15-mg doses and a total dose of 180 mg or placebo was given intravenously three times a week, one hour prior to radiotherapy, during weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5. Group 3 received conventional care but no radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Median survival rates of patients were 10.8 months in Groups 1 and 2, and 5.2 months in Groups 3, a statistically significant difference. With regard to performance, the patients in Group 3 deteriorated faster than patients in Groups 1 and 2. Bleomycin had no positive or negative influence on survival.

405 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This manuscript focuses on the NCCN Guidelines Panel recommendations for the workup, primary treatment, risk reduction strategies, and surveillance specific to DCIS.
Abstract: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast represents a heterogeneous group of neoplastic lesions in the breast ducts. The goal for management of DCIS is to prevent the development of invasive breast cancer. This manuscript focuses on the NCCN Guidelines Panel recommendations for the workup, primary treatment, risk reduction strategies, and surveillance specific to DCIS.

1,545 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Lesley A. Stewart1
TL;DR: A small but clear improvement in survival from chemotherapy is shown, which encourages further study of drug treatment of these tumours.

1,215 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 Apr 1993-Cancer
TL;DR: The value of chemotherapy after standard postoperative external beam radiation in the treatment of malignant gliomas remains controversial, and several recent trials have questioned the efficacy of this approach.
Abstract: Background. The value of chemotherapy after standard postoperative external beam radiation in the treatment of malignant gliomas remains controversial. Despite recent recommendations from the Brain Tumor Cooperative Group that chemotherapy should be considered part of the standard treatment of patients with highgrade astrocytomas, several recent trials have questioned the efficacy of this approach. Methods. Using results from 16 randomized clinical trials involving more than 3000 patients, the authors compared the survival rates of patients who received radiation alone or radiation with chemotherapy. The combined data were analyzed using the statistical method of meta-analysis as described by DerSimonian and Laird. Results. The estimated increase in survival for patients treated with combination radiation and chemotherapy was 10.1% at 1 year (95% confidence interval, 6.8, 13.3%) and 8.6% at 2 years (5.2, 12.0%). These absolute increases in survival (treated-control [TC]) in patients treated with chemotherapy represent relative increases (T-C)/C of 23.4% at 1 year (15.8, 30.9%) and 52.4% at 2 years (31.7, 73.2%). This survival advantage is conferred by several different chemotherapeutic agents. When the prognostic variables of age and histology are factored into the analysis, however, the data suggest that the survival benefit from chemotherapy occurs earlier in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) than in patients with glioblastoma. Conclusions. The authors concluded that chemotherapy is advantageous for patients with malignant gliomas and should be considered part of the standard therapeutic regimen. Additional randomized trials using optimal radiation and chemotherapy may still be needed to precisely define which subgroups of patients, based on prognostic variables, will benefit most from chemotherapy after radiation.

830 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This regimen of concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy may prolong the survival of patients with glioblastoma.
Abstract: PURPOSE: Temozolomide is a novel oral alkylating agent with demonstrated efficacy as second-line therapy for patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This phase II study was performed to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of concomitant radiation plus temozolomide therapy followed by adjuvant temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients were enrolled onto this open-label, phase II trial. Temozolomide (75 mg/m2/d × 7 d/wk for 6 weeks) was administered orally concomitant with fractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy total dose: 2 Gy × 5 d/wk for 6 weeks) followed by temozolomide monotherapy (200 mg/m2/d × 5 days, every 28 days for six cycles). The primary end points were safety and tolerability, and the secondary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: Concomitant radiation plus temozolomide therapy was safe and well tolerated. Nonhematologic toxicities were rare and mild to moderate in severity. During t...

810 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Radiotherapy results in a modest improvement in survival, without reducing the quality of life or cognition, in elderly patients with glioblastoma.
Abstract: Background There is no community standard for the treatment of glioblastoma in patients 70 years of age or older. We conducted a randomized trial that compared radiotherapy and supportive care with supportive care alone in such patients. Methods Patients 70 years of age or older with a newly diagnosed anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma and a Karnofsky performance score of 70 or higher were randomly assigned to receive supportive care only or supportive care plus radiotherapy (focal radiation in daily fractions of 1.8 Gy given 5 days per week, for a total dose of 50 Gy). The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progressionfree survival, tolerance of radiotherapy, health-related quality of life, and cognition. Results We randomly assigned 85 patients from 10 centers to receive either radiotherapy and supportive care or supportive care alone. The trial was discontinued at the first interim analysis, which showed that with a preset boundary of efficacy, radiotherapy and supportive care were superior to supportive care alone. A final analysis was carried out for the 81 patients with glioblastoma (median age, 73 years; range, 70 to 85). At a median follow-up of 21 weeks, the median survival for the 39 patients who received radiotherapy plus supportive care was 29.1 weeks, as compared with 16.9 weeks for the 42 patients who received supportive care alone. The hazard ratio for death in the radiotherapy group was 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.76; P = 0.002). There were no severe adverse events related to radiotherapy. The results of quality-of-life and cognitive evaluations over time did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. Conclusions Radiotherapy results in a modest improvement in survival, without reducing the quality of life or cognition, in elderly patients with glioblastoma. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00430911.)

742 citations