scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

R P Gage

Bio: R P Gage is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cancer & Survival rate. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 914 citations.

Papers
More filters

Cited by
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the product-limit (PL) estimator was proposed to estimate the proportion of items in the population whose lifetimes would exceed t (in the absence of such losses), without making any assumption about the form of the function P(t).
Abstract: In lifetesting, medical follow-up, and other fields the observation of the time of occurrence of the event of interest (called a death) may be prevented for some of the items of the sample by the previous occurrence of some other event (called a loss). Losses may be either accidental or controlled, the latter resulting from a decision to terminate certain observations. In either case it is usually assumed in this paper that the lifetime (age at death) is independent of the potential loss time; in practice this assumption deserves careful scrutiny. Despite the resulting incompleteness of the data, it is desired to estimate the proportion P(t) of items in the population whose lifetimes would exceed t (in the absence of such losses), without making any assumption about the form of the function P(t). The observation for each item of a suitable initial event, marking the beginning of its lifetime, is presupposed. For random samples of size N the product-limit (PL) estimate can be defined as follows: L...

52,450 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This report attempts to correct shortcomings while reinforcing those recommendations that have proven satisfactory on lower extremity ischemia and is intended to replace the original version.

3,017 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Acceptance of survival as a criterion for measuring the effectiveness of cancer therapy is attested to by the very large number of papers published every year reporting on the survival experience of cancer patients.

2,809 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This is, to the authors' knowledge, the first worldwide analysis of cancer survival, with standard quality-control procedures and identical analytic methods for all datasets, and should eventually facilitate joint assessment of international trends in incidence, survival, and mortality as indicators of cancer control.
Abstract: Summary Background Cancer survival varies widely between countries. The CONCORD study provides survival estimates for 1·9 million adults (aged 15–99 years) diagnosed with a first, primary, invasive cancer of the breast (women), colon, rectum, or prostate during 1990–94 and followed up to 1999, by use of individual tumour records from 101 population-based cancer registries in 31 countries on five continents. This is, to our knowledge, the first worldwide analysis of cancer survival, with standard quality-control procedures and identical analytic methods for all datasets. Methods To compensate for wide international differences in general population (background) mortality by age, sex, country, region, calendar period, and (in the USA) ethnic origin, we estimated relative survival, the ratio of survival noted in the patients with cancer, and the survival that would have been expected had they been subject only to the background mortality rates. 2800 life tables were constructed. Survival estimates were also adjusted for differences in the age structure of populations of patients with cancer. Findings Global variation in cancer survival was very wide. 5-year relative survival for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer was generally higher in North America, Australia, Japan, and northern, western, and southern Europe, and lower in Algeria, Brazil, and eastern Europe. CONCORD has provided the first opportunity to estimate cancer survival in 11 states in USA covered by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR), and the study covers 42% of the US population, four-fold more than previously available. Cancer survival in black men and women was systematically and substantially lower than in white men and women in all 16 states and six metropolitan areas included. Relative survival for all ethnicities combined was 2–4% lower in states covered by NPCR than in areas covered by the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. Age-standardised relative survival by use of the appropriate race-specific and state-specific life tables was up to 2% lower for breast cancer and up to 5% lower for prostate cancer than with the census-derived national life tables used by the SEER Program. These differences in population coverage and analytical method have both contributed to the survival deficit noted between Europe and the USA, from which only SEER data have been available until now. Interpretation Until now, direct comparisons of cancer survival between high-income and low-income countries have not generally been available. The information provided here might therefore be a useful stimulus for change. The findings should eventually facilitate joint assessment of international trends in incidence, survival, and mortality as indicators of cancer control. Funding Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA), Department of Health (London, UK), Cancer Research UK (London, UK).

1,178 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 Oct 1991-Blood
TL;DR: Among recipients of T-cell-depleted transplants for early leukemia, radiation doses greater than or equal to 11 Gy, dose rates greater than 14 cGy/min, and additional posttransplant immune suppression with cyclosporine alone or methotrexate were associated with fewer treatment failures but use of monoclonal antibodies rather than physical techniques for T- cell depletion and fractionated radiation was associated with increased treatment failure and lower leukemia-free survival.

789 citations