scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

R. Schmitt

Bio: R. Schmitt is an academic researcher from Fermilab. The author has contributed to research in topics: Neutrino & Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 23 publications receiving 2612 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
B. Flaugher1, H. T. Diehl1, K. Honscheid2, T. M. C. Abbott, O. Alvarez1, R. Angstadt1, J. Annis1, M. Antonik3, O. Ballester4, L. Beaufore2, Gary Bernstein5, R. A. Bernstein6, B. Bigelow7, Marco Bonati, D. Boprie7, David J. Brooks3, E. Buckley-Geer1, J. Campa, L. Cardiel-Sas4, Francisco J. Castander8, Javier Castilla, H. Cease1, J. M. Cela-Ruiz, S. Chappa1, Edward C. Chi1, C. Cooper7, L. N. da Costa, E. Dede7, G. Derylo1, Darren L. DePoy9, J. De Vicente, Peter Doel3, Alex Drlica-Wagner1, J. Eiting2, Ann Elliott2, J. Emes10, Juan Estrada1, A. Fausti Neto, D. A. Finley1, R. Flores1, Josh Frieman1, Josh Frieman11, D. W. Gerdes7, Michael D. Gladders11, B. Gregory, G. Gutierrez1, Jiangang Hao1, S.E. Holland10, Scott Holm1, D. Huffman1, Cheryl Jackson1, David J. James, M. Jonas1, Armin Karcher10, I. Karliner12, Steve Kent1, Richard Kessler11, Mark Kozlovsky1, Richard G. Kron11, Donna Kubik1, Kyler Kuehn13, S. E. Kuhlmann14, K. Kuk1, Ofer Lahav3, A. Lathrop1, J. Lee10, Michael Levi10, P. Lewis15, Tianjun Li9, I. Mandrichenko1, Jennifer L. Marshall9, G. Martinez, K. W. Merritt1, Ramon Miquel16, Ramon Miquel4, F. Munoz, Eric H. Neilsen1, Robert C. Nichol17, Brian Nord1, Ricardo L. C. Ogando, Jamieson Olsen1, N. Palaio9, K. Patton2, John Peoples1, A. A. Plazas18, A. A. Plazas19, J. Rauch1, Kevin Reil15, J.-P. Rheault9, Natalie A. Roe10, H. Rogers15, A. Roodman15, A. Roodman20, E. J. Sanchez, V. Scarpine1, Rafe Schindler15, Ricardo Schmidt, R. Schmitt1, Michael Schubnell7, Katherine Schultz1, P. Schurter, L. Scott1, S. Serrano8, Terri Shaw1, Robert Connon Smith, Marcelle Soares-Santos1, A. Stefanik1, W. Stuermer1, E. Suchyta2, A. Sypniewski7, G. Tarle7, Jon J Thaler12, R. Tighe, C. Tran10, Douglas L. Tucker1, Alistair R. Walker, G. Wang10, M. Watson1, Curtis Weaverdyck7, W. C. Wester1, Robert J. Woods1, Brian Yanny1 
TL;DR: The Dark Energy Camera as mentioned in this paper was designed and constructed by the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, and meets or exceeds the stringent requirements designed for the wide-field and supernova surveys for which the collaboration uses it.
Abstract: The Dark Energy Camera is a new imager with a 2.2-degree diameter field of view mounted at the prime focus of the Victor M. Blanco 4-meter telescope on Cerro Tololo near La Serena, Chile. The camera was designed and constructed by the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, and meets or exceeds the stringent requirements designed for the wide-field and supernova surveys for which the collaboration uses it. The camera consists of a five element optical corrector, seven filters, a shutter with a 60 cm aperture, and a CCD focal plane of 250 micron thick fully-depleted CCDs cooled inside a vacuum Dewar. The 570 Mpixel focal plane comprises 62 2kx4k CCDs for imaging and 12 2kx2k CCDs for guiding and focus. The CCDs have 15 microns x15 microns pixels with a plate scale of 0.263 arc sec per pixel. A hexapod system provides state-of-the-art focus and alignment capability. The camera is read out in 20 seconds with 6-9 electrons readout noise. This paper provides a technical description of the camera's engineering, construction, installation, and current status.

844 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
B. Flaugher, H. T. Diehl, K. Honscheid, T. M. C. Abbott, O. Alvarez, R. Angstadt, J. Annis, M. Antonik, O. Ballester, L. Beaufore, Gary Bernstein, Rebecca A. Bernstein, B. Bigelow, Marco Bonati, D. Boprie, David J. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, J. Campa, Laia Cardiel-Sas, Francisco J. Castander, Javier Castilla, H. Cease, J. M. Cela-Ruiz, Steve Chappa, Edward C. Chi, C. Cooper, L. N. da Costa, E. Dede, G. Derylo, Darren L. DePoy, J. De Vicente, P. Doel, Alex Drlica-Wagner, J. Eiting, Ann Elliott, J. Emes, Juan Estrada, A. Fausti Neto, D. A. Finley, R. Flores, Josh Frieman, D. W. Gerdes, Michael D. Gladders, B. Gregory, G. Gutierrez, Jiangang Hao, S.E. Holland, Scott Holm, D. Huffman, Cheryl Jackson, David J. James, M. Jonas, Armin Karcher, I. Karliner, Steve Kent, Richard Kessler, Mark Kozlovsky, Richard G. Kron, Donna Kubik, K. Kuehn, S. E. Kuhlmann, K. Kuk, O. Lahav, A. Lathrop, J. Lee, Michael Levi, Peter Lewis, Tianjun Li, I. Mandrichenko, Jennifer L. Marshall, G. Martinez, K. W. Merritt, Ramon Miquel, F. Munoz, Eric H. Neilsen, Robert C. Nichol, Brian Nord, Ricardo L. C. Ogando, Jamieson Olsen, N. Palio, K. Patton, John Peoples, A. A. Plazas, J. Rauch, Kevin Reil, J.-P. Rheault, Natalie A. Roe, H. Rogers, A. Roodman, E. J. Sanchez, V. Scarpine, R. H. Schindler, Ricardo Schmidt, R. Schmitt, Michael Schubnell, Katherine Schultz, P. Schurter, L. Scott, S. Serrano, Terri Shaw, Robert Connon Smith, Marcelle Soares-Santos, A. Stefanik, W. Stuermer, E. Suchyta, A. Sypniewski, G. Tarle, Jon J Thaler, R. Tighe, C. Tran, Douglas L. Tucker, Alistair R. Walker, G. Wang, M. G. Watson, Curtis Weaverdyck, W. C. Wester, Robert J. Woods, B. Yanny 
TL;DR: The Dark Energy Camera as discussed by the authors was designed and constructed by the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, and meets or exceeds the stringent requirements designed for the wide-field and supernova surveys for which the collaboration uses it.
Abstract: The Dark Energy Camera is a new imager with a 2.2-degree diameter field of view mounted at the prime focus of the Victor M. Blanco 4-meter telescope on Cerro Tololo near La Serena, Chile. The camera was designed and constructed by the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, and meets or exceeds the stringent requirements designed for the wide-field and supernova surveys for which the collaboration uses it. The camera consists of a five element optical corrector, seven filters, a shutter with a 60 cm aperture, and a CCD focal plane of 250 micron thick fully-depleted CCDs cooled inside a vacuum Dewar. The 570 Mpixel focal plane comprises 62 2kx4k CCDs for imaging and 12 2kx2k CCDs for guiding and focus. The CCDs have 15 microns x15 microns pixels with a plate scale of 0.263 arc sec per pixel. A hexapod system provides state-of-the-art focus and alignment capability. The camera is read out in 20 seconds with 6-9 electrons readout noise. This paper provides a technical description of the camera's engineering, construction, installation, and current status.

715 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this paper, the physics program for the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) at the Fermilab Long-Baseline Neurtrino Facility (LBNF) is described.
Abstract: The Physics Program for the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) at the Fermilab Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) is described.

422 citations

18 Dec 2015
TL;DR: In this paper, the physics program for the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) at the Fermilab Long-Baseline Neurtrino Facility (LBNF) is described.
Abstract: The Physics Program for the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) at the Fermilab Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) is described.

243 citations

12 Jan 2016
TL;DR: The conceptual design report (CDR) put forward by an international neutrino community to pursue the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment at the LBNF/DUNE is presented in this article.
Abstract: This document presents the Conceptual Design Report (CDR) put forward by an international neutrino community to pursue the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment at the Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF/DUNE), a groundbreaking science experiment for long-baseline neutrino oscillation studies and for neutrino astrophysics and nucleon decay searches. The DUNE far detector will be a very large modular liquid argon time-projection chamber (LArTPC) located deep underground, coupled to the LBNF multi-megawatt wide-band neutrino beam. DUNE will also have a high-resolution and high-precision near detector.

224 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors.
Abstract: On 2017 August 17 a binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor independently detected a gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) with a time delay of $\sim 1.7\,{\rm{s}}$ with respect to the merger time. From the gravitational-wave signal, the source was initially localized to a sky region of 31 deg2 at a luminosity distance of ${40}_{-8}^{+8}$ Mpc and with component masses consistent with neutron stars. The component masses were later measured to be in the range 0.86 to 2.26 $\,{M}_{\odot }$. An extensive observing campaign was launched across the electromagnetic spectrum leading to the discovery of a bright optical transient (SSS17a, now with the IAU identification of AT 2017gfo) in NGC 4993 (at $\sim 40\,{\rm{Mpc}}$) less than 11 hours after the merger by the One-Meter, Two Hemisphere (1M2H) team using the 1 m Swope Telescope. The optical transient was independently detected by multiple teams within an hour. Subsequent observations targeted the object and its environment. Early ultraviolet observations revealed a blue transient that faded within 48 hours. Optical and infrared observations showed a redward evolution over ~10 days. Following early non-detections, X-ray and radio emission were discovered at the transient's position $\sim 9$ and $\sim 16$ days, respectively, after the merger. Both the X-ray and radio emission likely arise from a physical process that is distinct from the one that generates the UV/optical/near-infrared emission. No ultra-high-energy gamma-rays and no neutrino candidates consistent with the source were found in follow-up searches. These observations support the hypothesis that GW170817 was produced by the merger of two neutron stars in NGC 4993 followed by a short gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) and a kilonova/macronova powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei synthesized in the ejecta.

2,746 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg2 of griz imaging data from the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1), were presented.
Abstract: We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg2 of griz imaging data from the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric-redshift estimation and validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias, the bulk of the analysis was carried out while "blind" to the true results; we describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat ΛCDM and wCDM cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for ΛCDM) or 7 (for wCDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino mass density and including the 457×457 element analytic covariance matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point functions and from their combination obtain S8≡σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.773-0.020+0.026 and Ωm=0.267-0.017+0.030 for ΛCDM; for wCDM, we find S8=0.782-0.024+0.036, Ωm=0.284-0.030+0.033, and w=-0.82-0.20+0.21 at 68% C.L. The precision of these DES Y1 constraints rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms. Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for S8 and Ωm are lower than the central values from Planck for both ΛCDM and wCDM, the Bayes factor indicates that the DES Y1 and Planck data sets are consistent with each other in the context of ΛCDM. Combining DES Y1 with Planck, baryonic acoustic oscillation measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS and type Ia supernovae from the Joint Lightcurve Analysis data set, we derive very tight constraints on cosmological parameters: S8=0.802±0.012 and Ωm=0.298±0.007 in ΛCDM and w=-1.00-0.04+0.05 in wCDM. Upcoming Dark Energy Survey analyses will provide more stringent tests of the ΛCDM model and extensions such as a time-varying equation of state of dark energy or modified gravity.

1,201 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Eric C. Bellm1, Shrinivas R. Kulkarni2, Matthew J. Graham2, Richard Dekany2, Roger M. H. Smith2, Reed Riddle2, Frank J. Masci2, George Helou2, Thomas A. Prince2, Scott M. Adams2, Cristina Barbarino3, Tom A. Barlow2, James Bauer4, Ron Beck2, Justin Belicki2, Rahul Biswas3, Nadejda Blagorodnova2, Dennis Bodewits4, Bryce Bolin1, V. Brinnel5, Tim Brooke2, Brian D. Bue2, Mattia Bulla3, Rick Burruss2, S. Bradley Cenko4, S. Bradley Cenko6, Chan-Kao Chang7, Andrew J. Connolly1, Michael W. Coughlin2, John Cromer2, Virginia Cunningham4, Kaushik De2, Alex Delacroix2, Vandana Desai2, Dmitry A. Duev2, Gwendolyn Eadie1, Tony L. Farnham4, Michael Feeney2, Ulrich Feindt3, David Flynn2, Anna Franckowiak, Sara Frederick4, Christoffer Fremling2, Avishay Gal-Yam8, Suvi Gezari4, Matteo Giomi5, Daniel A. Goldstein2, V. Zach Golkhou1, Ariel Goobar3, Steven Groom2, Eugean Hacopians2, David Hale2, John Henning2, Anna Y. Q. Ho2, David Hover2, Justin Howell2, Tiara Hung4, Daniela Huppenkothen1, David Imel2, Wing-Huen Ip9, Wing-Huen Ip7, Željko Ivezić1, Edward Jackson2, Lynne Jones1, Mario Juric1, Mansi M. Kasliwal2, Shai Kaspi10, Stephen Kaye2, Michael S. P. Kelley4, Marek Kowalski5, Emily Kramer2, Thomas Kupfer11, Thomas Kupfer2, Walter Landry2, Russ R. Laher2, Chien De Lee7, Hsing Wen Lin12, Hsing Wen Lin7, Zhong-Yi Lin7, Ragnhild Lunnan3, Ashish Mahabal2, Peter H. Mao2, Adam A. Miller13, Adam A. Miller14, Serge Monkewitz2, Patrick J. Murphy2, Chow-Choong Ngeow7, Jakob Nordin5, Peter Nugent15, Peter Nugent16, Eran O. Ofek8, Maria T. Patterson1, Bryan E. Penprase17, Michael Porter2, L. Rauch, Umaa Rebbapragada2, Daniel J. Reiley2, Mickael Rigault18, Hector P. Rodriguez2, Jan van Roestel19, Ben Rusholme2, J. V. Santen, Steve Schulze8, David L. Shupe2, Leo Singer6, Leo Singer4, Maayane T. Soumagnac8, Robert Stein, Jason Surace2, Jesper Sollerman3, Paula Szkody1, Francesco Taddia3, Scott Terek2, Angela Van Sistine20, Sjoert van Velzen4, W. Thomas Vestrand21, Richard Walters2, Charlotte Ward4, Quanzhi Ye2, Po-Chieh Yu7, Lin Yan2, Jeffry Zolkower2 
TL;DR: The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) as mentioned in this paper is a new optical time-domain survey that uses the Palomar 48 inch Schmidt telescope, which provides a 47 deg^2 field of view and 8 s readout time, yielding more than an order of magnitude improvement in survey speed relative to its predecessor survey.
Abstract: The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) is a new optical time-domain survey that uses the Palomar 48 inch Schmidt telescope. A custom-built wide-field camera provides a 47 deg^2 field of view and 8 s readout time, yielding more than an order of magnitude improvement in survey speed relative to its predecessor survey, the Palomar Transient Factory. We describe the design and implementation of the camera and observing system. The ZTF data system at the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center provides near-real-time reduction to identify moving and varying objects. We outline the analysis pipelines, data products, and associated archive. Finally, we present on-sky performance analysis and first scientific results from commissioning and the early survey. ZTF's public alert stream will serve as a useful precursor for that of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.

1,009 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
B. Flaugher1, H. T. Diehl1, K. Honscheid2, T. M. C. Abbott, O. Alvarez1, R. Angstadt1, J. Annis1, M. Antonik3, O. Ballester4, L. Beaufore2, Gary Bernstein5, R. A. Bernstein6, B. Bigelow7, Marco Bonati, D. Boprie7, David J. Brooks3, E. Buckley-Geer1, J. Campa, L. Cardiel-Sas4, Francisco J. Castander8, Javier Castilla, H. Cease1, J. M. Cela-Ruiz, S. Chappa1, Edward C. Chi1, C. Cooper7, L. N. da Costa, E. Dede7, G. Derylo1, Darren L. DePoy9, J. De Vicente, Peter Doel3, Alex Drlica-Wagner1, J. Eiting2, Ann Elliott2, J. Emes10, Juan Estrada1, A. Fausti Neto, D. A. Finley1, R. Flores1, Josh Frieman1, Josh Frieman11, D. W. Gerdes7, Michael D. Gladders11, B. Gregory, G. Gutierrez1, Jiangang Hao1, S.E. Holland10, Scott Holm1, D. Huffman1, Cheryl Jackson1, David J. James, M. Jonas1, Armin Karcher10, I. Karliner12, Steve Kent1, Richard Kessler11, Mark Kozlovsky1, Richard G. Kron11, Donna Kubik1, Kyler Kuehn13, S. E. Kuhlmann14, K. Kuk1, Ofer Lahav3, A. Lathrop1, J. Lee10, Michael Levi10, P. Lewis15, Tianjun Li9, I. Mandrichenko1, Jennifer L. Marshall9, G. Martinez, K. W. Merritt1, Ramon Miquel16, Ramon Miquel4, F. Munoz, Eric H. Neilsen1, Robert C. Nichol17, Brian Nord1, Ricardo L. C. Ogando, Jamieson Olsen1, N. Palaio9, K. Patton2, John Peoples1, A. A. Plazas18, A. A. Plazas19, J. Rauch1, Kevin Reil15, J.-P. Rheault9, Natalie A. Roe10, H. Rogers15, A. Roodman20, A. Roodman15, E. J. Sanchez, V. Scarpine1, Rafe Schindler15, Ricardo Schmidt, R. Schmitt1, Michael Schubnell7, Katherine Schultz1, P. Schurter, L. Scott1, S. Serrano8, Terri Shaw1, Robert Connon Smith, Marcelle Soares-Santos1, A. Stefanik1, W. Stuermer1, E. Suchyta2, A. Sypniewski7, G. Tarle7, Jon J Thaler12, R. Tighe, C. Tran10, Douglas L. Tucker1, Alistair R. Walker, G. Wang10, M. Watson1, Curtis Weaverdyck7, W. C. Wester1, Robert J. Woods1, Brian Yanny1 
TL;DR: The Dark Energy Camera as mentioned in this paper was designed and constructed by the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, and meets or exceeds the stringent requirements designed for the wide-field and supernova surveys for which the collaboration uses it.
Abstract: The Dark Energy Camera is a new imager with a 2.2-degree diameter field of view mounted at the prime focus of the Victor M. Blanco 4-meter telescope on Cerro Tololo near La Serena, Chile. The camera was designed and constructed by the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, and meets or exceeds the stringent requirements designed for the wide-field and supernova surveys for which the collaboration uses it. The camera consists of a five element optical corrector, seven filters, a shutter with a 60 cm aperture, and a CCD focal plane of 250 micron thick fully-depleted CCDs cooled inside a vacuum Dewar. The 570 Mpixel focal plane comprises 62 2kx4k CCDs for imaging and 12 2kx2k CCDs for guiding and focus. The CCDs have 15 microns x15 microns pixels with a plate scale of 0.263 arc sec per pixel. A hexapod system provides state-of-the-art focus and alignment capability. The camera is read out in 20 seconds with 6-9 electrons readout noise. This paper provides a technical description of the camera's engineering, construction, installation, and current status.

844 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The most recent data release from the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys (SDSS-IV) is DR16 as mentioned in this paper, which is the fourth and penultimate from the fourth phase of the survey.
Abstract: This paper documents the sixteenth data release (DR16) from the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys; the fourth and penultimate from the fourth phase (SDSS-IV). This is the first release of data from the southern hemisphere survey of the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment 2 (APOGEE-2); new data from APOGEE-2 North are also included. DR16 is also notable as the final data release for the main cosmological program of the Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS), and all raw and reduced spectra from that project are released here. DR16 also includes all the data from the Time Domain Spectroscopic Survey (TDSS) and new data from the SPectroscopic IDentification of ERosita Survey (SPIDERS) programs, both of which were co-observed on eBOSS plates. DR16 has no new data from the Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) survey (or the MaNGA Stellar Library "MaStar"). We also preview future SDSS-V operations (due to start in 2020), and summarize plans for the final SDSS-IV data release (DR17).

803 citations