scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Radek Poleski

Other affiliations: University of Warsaw
Bio: Radek Poleski is an academic researcher from Ohio State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Gravitational microlensing & Planet. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 72 publications receiving 1335 citations. Previous affiliations of Radek Poleski include University of Warsaw.

Papers published on a yearly basis

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
David P. Bennett1, V. Batista, Ian A. Bond2, C. S. Bennett3, C. S. Bennett4, Daisuke Suzuki5, J. P. Beaulieu6, Andrzej Udalski7, J. Donatowicz8, Valerio Bozza9, Valerio Bozza10, Fumio Abe11, C. S. Botzler12, M. Freeman12, D. Fukunaga11, Akihiko Fukui, Yoshitaka Itow11, Naoki Koshimoto5, C. H. Ling2, Kimiaki Masuda11, Yutaka Matsubara11, Yasushi Muraki11, S. Namba5, Kouji Ohnishi, Nicholas J. Rattenbury12, To. Saito13, Denis J. Sullivan14, Takahiro Sumi5, Winston L. Sweatman2, Paul J. Tristram, N. Tsurumi11, K. Wada5, Philip Yock12, Michael D. Albrow15, Etienne Bachelet16, S. Brillant17, J. A. R. Caldwell, Arnaud Cassan6, Andrew A. Cole18, E. Corrales6, C. Coutures6, S. Dieters18, D. Dominis Prester19, Pascal Fouqué16, J. G. Greenhill18, Keith Horne20, J.-R. Koo21, D. Kubas6, J. B. Marquette6, R. Martin, J. W. Menzies, Kailash C. Sahu22, Joachim Wambsganss23, Andrew Williams, M. Zub23, J.-Y. Choi21, Darren L. DePoy24, Subo Dong25, B. S. Gaudi26, Andrew Gould26, Chang S. Han21, Calen B. Henderson26, D. McGregor26, C.-U. Lee27, Richard W. Pogge26, I.-G. Shin21, Jennifer C. Yee26, Jennifer C. Yee28, Michał K. Szymański7, Jan Skowron7, Radek Poleski26, Radek Poleski7, S. Kozllowski7, Lukasz Wyrzykowski7, M. Kubiak7, Paweł Pietrukowicz7, Grzegorz Pietrzyński29, Grzegorz Pietrzyński7, Igor Soszyński7, Krzysztof Ulaczyk7, Yiannis Tsapras30, Yiannis Tsapras31, Rachel Street31, Martin Dominik20, Martin Dominik32, D. M. Bramich33, P. Browne20, M. Hundertmark20, N. Kains, Colin Snodgrass34, Iain A. Steele35, I. Dékány36, Oscar A. Gonzalez17, D. Heyrovsky34, Ryo Kandori11, Eamonn Kerins37, P. W. Lucas38, Dante Minniti36, Takahiro Nagayama11, Marina Rejkuba17, Annie C. Robin39, R. Saito38 
TL;DR: In this paper, the first microlensing candidate for a free-floating exoplanet-exomoon system, MOA-2011-BLG-262, with a primary lens mass of M host ~ 4 Jupiter masses hosting a sub-Earth mass moon was presented.
Abstract: We present the first microlensing candidate for a free-floating exoplanet-exomoon system, MOA-2011-BLG-262, with a primary lens mass of M host ~ 4 Jupiter masses hosting a sub-Earth mass moon. The argument for an exomoon hinges on the system being relatively close to the Sun. The data constrain the product ML πrel where ML is the lens system mass and πrel is the lens-source relative parallax. If the lens system is nearby (large πrel), then ML is small (a few Jupiter masses) and the companion is a sub-Earth-mass exomoon. The best-fit solution has a large lens-source relative proper motion, μrel = 19.6 ± 1.6 mas yr–1, which would rule out a distant lens system unless the source star has an unusually high proper motion. However, data from the OGLE collaboration nearly rule out a high source proper motion, so the exoplanet+exomoon model is the favored interpretation for the best fit model. However, there is an alternate solution that has a lower proper motion and fits the data almost as well. This solution is compatible with a distant (so stellar) host. A Bayesian analysis does not favor the exoplanet+exomoon interpretation, so Occam's razor favors a lens system in the bulge with host and companion masses of and , at a projected separation of AU. The existence of this degeneracy is an unlucky accident, so current microlensing experiments are in principle sensitive to exomoons. In some circumstances, it will be possible to definitively establish the mass of such lens systems through the microlensing parallax effect. Future experiments will be sensitive to less extreme exomoons.

173 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Jan Skowron, Andrzej Udalski, Andrew Gould, Subo Dong, L. A. G. Monard, C. Han, Cameron Nelson, Jennie McCormick, D. Moorhouse, G. Thornley, Anaëlle Maury, D. M. Bramich, J. G. Greenhill, S. Kozlowski, Ian A. Bond, Radek Poleski, L. Wyrzykowski, K. Ulaczyk, M. Kubiak, Michał K. Szymański, Grzegorz Pietrzyński, Igor Soszyński, B. S. Gaudi, Jennifer C. Yee, Li-Wei Hung, R. W. Pogge, Darren L. DePoy, C.-U. Lee, Byeong-Gon Park, William H. Allen, F. Mallia, Jack D. Drummond, Greg Bolt, Alasdair Allan, P. Browne, N. R. Clay, Martin Dominik, S. N. Fraser, Keith Horne, N. Kains, C. J. Mottram, Colin Snodgrass, Iain A. Steele, Rachel Street, Yiannis Tsapras, Fumio Abe, David P. Bennett, C. S. Botzler, Dimitri Douchin, M. Freeman, Akihiko Fukui, K. Furusawa, F. Hayashi, John B. Hearnshaw, S. Hosaka, Yoshitaka Itow, Kisaku Kamiya, P. M. Kilmartin, A. V. Korpela, W. Lin, C. H. Ling, S. Makita, Kimiaki Masuda, Y. Matsubara, Y. Muraki, Takahiro Nagayama, N. Miyake, K. Nishimoto, K. Ohnishi, Y. C. Perrott, N. J. Rattenbury, To. Saito, L. Skuljan, Denis J. Sullivan, Takahiro Sumi, Daisuke Suzuki, Winston L. Sweatman, P. J. Tristram, K. Wada, P. C. M. Yock, J. P. Beaulieu, P. Fouque, Michael D. Albrow, V. Batista, Stephane Brillant, J. A. R. Caldwell, Arnaud Cassan, Andrew A. Cole, K. H. Cook, Ch. Coutures, S. Dieters, D. Dominis Prester, J. Donatowicz, S. R. Kane, D. Kubas, J. B. Marquette, R. M. Martin, J. W. Menzies, Kailash C. Sahu, Joachim Wambsganss, Andrew Williams, M. Zub 
TL;DR: In this article, the first example of binary microlensing for which the parameter measurements can be verified (or contradicted) by future Doppler observations is presented, made possible by a confluence of two relatively unusual circumstances.
Abstract: We present the first example of binary microlensing for which the parameter measurements can be verified (or contradicted) by future Doppler observations. This test is made possible by a confluence of two relatively unusual circumstances. First, the binary lens is bright enough (I=15.6) to permit Doppler measurements. Second, we measure not only the usual 7 binary-lens parameters, but also the 'microlens parallax' (which yields the binary mass) and two components of the instantaneous orbital velocity. Thus we measure, effectively, 6 'Kepler+1' parameters (two instantaneous positions, two instantaneous velocities, the binary total mass, and the mass ratio). Since Doppler observations of the brighter binary component determine 5 Kepler parameters (period, velocity amplitude, eccentricity, phase, and position of periapsis), while the same spectroscopy yields the mass of the primary, the combined Doppler + microlensing observations would be overconstrained by 6 + (5 + 1) - (7 + 1) = 4 degrees of freedom. This makes possible an extremely strong test of the microlensing solution. We also introduce a uniform microlensing notation for single and binary lenses, we define conventions, summarize all known microlensing degeneracies and extend a set of parameters to describe full Keplerian motion of the binary lenses.

149 citations

Posted Content
Rachel Akeson1, Lee Armus1, Etienne Bachelet2, Vanessa P. Bailey1, Lisa Bartusek3, Andrea Bellini4, Dominic J. Benford, David P. Bennett3, Aparna Bhattacharya5, Ralph C. Bohlin4, Martha L. Boyer4, Valerio Bozza6, G. Bryden1, Sebastiano Calchi Novati1, Kenneth G. Carpenter3, Stefano Casertano4, Ami Choi7, Pratika Dayal8, Alan Dressler9, Olivier Doré1, S. Michael Fall4, Xiaohui Fan, Xiao Fang10, Alexei V. Filippenko11, Steven L. Finkelstein12, Ryan J. Foley13, Steven R. Furlanetto14, Jason Kalirai15, B. Scott Gaudi7, Karoline M. Gilbert4, Julien Girard4, Kevin Grady3, Jenny E. Greene16, Puragra Guhathakurta13, Chen Heinrich1, Shoubaneh Hemmati1, David Hendel17, Calen B. Henderson1, Thomas Henning18, Christopher M. Hirata7, Shirley Ho, E. M. Huff1, Anne Hutter8, Rolf A. Jansen19, Saurabh Jha20, Samson A. Johnson7, D. O. Jones12, Jeremy Kasdin16, Patrick L. Kelly21, R. P. Kirshner22, Anton M. Koekemoer4, Jeffrey W. Kruk3, Nikole K. Lewis23, Bruce Macintosh24, Piero Madau13, Sangeeta Malhotra3, Kaisey S. Mandel25, Elena Massara, Daniel Masters1, Julie McEnery3, Kristen B. W. McQuinn20, Peter Melchior16, M. Melton3, Bertrand Mennesson1, Molly S. Peeples4, Matthew T. Penny7, Saul Perlmutter11, Alice Pisani16, A. A. Plazas16, Radek Poleski7, Marc Postman4, Clément Ranc3, Bernard J. Rauscher3, Armin Rest4, Aki Roberge3, Brant Robertson13, Steven A. Rodney26, James E. Rhoads3, Jason Rhodes1, Russell E. Ryan4, Kailash C. Sahu4, Daniel Scolnic27, David J. Sand10, Anil C. Seth28, Yossi Shvartzvald1, Karelle Siellez13, Arfon M. Smith4, David N. Spergel, Keivan G. Stassun29, Rachel Street2, Louis Gregory Strolger4, Alexander S. Szalay30, John T. Trauger1, Michael Troxel27, Margaret Turnbull31, Roeland P. van der Marel4, Anja von der Linden32, Yun Wang1, David H. Weinberg7, Benjamin F. Williams33, Rogier A. Windhorst19, Edward J. Wollack3, Hao-Yi Wu7, Jennifer C. Yee34, Neil T. Zimmerman3 
TL;DR: The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) as discussed by the authors is a 2.4m space telescope with a 0.281 deg^2 field of view for near-IR imaging and slitless spectroscopy and a coronagraph designed for > 10^8 starlight suppresion.
Abstract: The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) is a 2.4m space telescope with a 0.281 deg^2 field of view for near-IR imaging and slitless spectroscopy and a coronagraph designed for > 10^8 starlight suppresion. As background information for Astro2020 white papers, this article summarizes the current design and anticipated performance of WFIRST. While WFIRST does not have the UV imaging/spectroscopic capabilities of the Hubble Space Telescope, for wide field near-IR surveys WFIRST is hundreds of times more efficient. Some of the most ambitious multi-cycle HST Treasury programs could be executed as routine General Observer (GO) programs on WFIRST. The large area and time-domain surveys planned for the cosmology and exoplanet microlensing programs will produce extraordinarily rich data sets that enable an enormous range of Archival Research (AR) investigations. Requirements for the coronagraph are defined based on its status as a technology demonstration, but its expected performance will enable unprecedented observations of nearby giant exoplanets and circumstellar disks. WFIRST is currently in the Preliminary Design and Technology Completion phase (Phase B), on schedule for launch in 2025, with several of its critical components already in production.

111 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Rachel Street1, Andrzej Udalski2, S. Calchi Novati3, S. Calchi Novati4, M. Hundertmark5, Wei Zhu6, Andrew Gould6, Jennifer C. Yee7, Yiannis Tsapras8, David P. Bennett9, U. G. Jørgensen5, Martin Dominik10, Michael I. Andersen5, Etienne Bachelet1, Etienne Bachelet11, Valerio Bozza12, Valerio Bozza4, D. M. Bramich11, Martin Burgdorf13, Arnaud Cassan14, Simona Ciceri15, Giuseppe D'Ago, Subo Dong16, Daniel F. Evans17, Shenghong Gu18, H. Harkonnen5, Tobias C. Hinse19, Keith Horne10, R. Figuera Jaimes20, R. Figuera Jaimes10, N. Kains21, Eamonn Kerins21, Heidi Korhonen5, M. Kuffmeier5, Luigi Mancini15, J. W. Menzies, Shude Mao18, Nuno Peixinho22, A. Popovas5, Markus Rabus15, Markus Rabus23, Sohrab Rahvar24, Clément Ranc14, R. Tronsgaard Rasmussen25, Gaetano Scarpetta4, R. W. Schmidt8, Jesper Skottfelt26, Colin Snodgrass26, John Southworth17, Iain A. Steele27, Jean Surdej, Eduardo Unda-Sanzana22, P. Verma, C. von Essen25, Joachim Wambsganss8, Yi-Bo Wang18, Olivier Wertz, Radek Poleski6, Radek Poleski2, M. Pawlak2, Michał K. Szymański2, Jan Skowron2, P. Mróz2, Szymon Kozłowski2, Łukasz Wyrzykowski2, Paweł Pietrukowicz2, Grzegorz Pietrzyński2, Igor Soszyński2, Krzysztof Ulaczyk28, C. A. Beichman3, G. Bryden3, Sean Carey3, B. S. Gaudi6, Calen B. Henderson6, Calen B. Henderson3, Richard W. Pogge6, Yossi Shvartzvald3, Fumio Abe29, Yuichiro Asakura29, Aparna Bhattacharya9, Ian A. Bond30, Martin Donachie31, M. Freeman31, Akihiko Fukui, Yuki Hirao32, K. Inayama33, Yoshitaka Itow29, Naoki Koshimoto32, Man Cheung Alex Li31, C. H. Ling30, Kimiaki Masuda29, Yutaka Matsubara29, Yasushi Muraki29, Masayuki Nagakane32, T. Nishioka29, Kouji Ohnishi, H. Oyokawa29, Nicholas J. Rattenbury31, To. Saito34, A. Sharan31, Denis J. Sullivan35, Takahiro Sumi32, Daisuke Suzuki29, J. Tristram, Y. Wakiyama9, Atsunori Yonehara33, C. Han36, J-Y. Choi36, H. Park36, Y. K. Jung36, I.-G. Shin36 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors reported the detection of a cold Neptune mplanet = 21 ± 2 M⊕ orbiting a 0.38 m⊙ M dwarf lying 2.5-3.3 kpc toward the Galactic center as part of a campaign combining ground-based and Spitzer observations.
Abstract: We report the detection of a cold Neptune mplanet = 21 ± 2 M⊕ orbiting a 0.38 M⊙ M dwarf lying 2.5–3.3 kpc toward the Galactic center as part of a campaign combining ground-based and Spitzer observations to measure the Galactic distribution of planets. This is the first time that the complex real-time protocols described by Yee et al., which aim to maximize planet sensitivity while maintaining sample integrity, have been carried out in practice. Multiple survey and follow up teams successfully combined their efforts within the framework of these protocols to detect this planet. This is the second planet in the Spitzer Galactic distribution sample. Both are in the near to mid-disk and are clearly not in the Galactic bulge.

103 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
04 Jul 2014-Science
TL;DR: In this paper, a cold terrestrial planet orbiting one member of a binary star system was detected using gravitational microlensing, and the planet has low mass (twice Earth's) and lies projected at ~0.8 astronomical units (AU) from its host star, about the distance between Earth and the Sun.
Abstract: Using gravitational microlensing, we detected a cold terrestrial planet orbiting one member of a binary star system. The planet has low mass (twice Earth’s) and lies projected at ~0.8 astronomical units (AU) from its host star, about the distance between Earth and the Sun. However, the planet’s temperature is much lower,

98 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Adrian M. Price-Whelan, Brigitta Sipőcz, Hans Moritz Günther, P. L. Lim, Steven M. Crawford, Simon Conseil, David L. Shupe, Matt Craig, N. Dencheva, Adam Ginsburg, Jacob T VanderPlas, Larry Bradley, David Pérez-Suárez, M. de Val-Borro, T. L. Aldcroft, Kelle L. Cruz, Thomas P. Robitaille, Erik J. Tollerud, C. Ardelean, Tomáš Babej, Matteo Bachetti, A. V. Bakanov, Steven P. Bamford, Geert Barentsen, Pauline Barmby, Andreas Baumbach, Katherine Berry, F. Biscani, Médéric Boquien, K. A. Bostroem, L. G. Bouma, G. B. Brammer, Erik Bray, H. Breytenbach, H. Buddelmeijer, Douglas Burke, G. Calderone, J. L. Cano Rodríguez, Mihai Cara, José Vinícius de Miranda Cardoso, S. Cheedella, Y. Copin, Devin Crichton, D. DÁvella, Christoph Deil, Éric Depagne, J. P. Dietrich, Axel Donath, Michael Droettboom, Nicholas Earl, T. Erben, Sebastien Fabbro, Leonardo Ferreira, T. Finethy, R. T. Fox, Lehman H. Garrison, S. L. J. Gibbons, Daniel A. Goldstein, Ralf Gommers, Johnny P. Greco, Perry Greenfield, A. M. Groener, Frédéric Grollier, Alex Hagen, Paul Hirst, Derek Homeier, Anthony Horton, Griffin Hosseinzadeh, L. Hu, J. S. Hunkeler, Željko Ivezić, A. Jain, Tim Jenness, G. Kanarek, Sarah Kendrew, Nicholas S. Kern, Wolfgang Kerzendorf, A. Khvalko, J. King, D. Kirkby, A. M. Kulkarni, Ashok Kumar, Antony Lee, D. Lenz, S. P. Littlefair, Zhiyuan Ma, D. M. Macleod, M. Mastropietro, C. McCully, S. Montagnac, Brett M. Morris, Michael Mueller, Stuart Mumford, Demitri Muna, Nicholas A. Murphy, Stefan Nelson, G. H. Nguyen, Joe Philip Ninan, M. Nöthe, S. Ogaz, Seog Oh, John K. Parejko, N. R. Parley, Sergio Pascual, R. Patil, A. A. Patil, A. L. Plunkett, Jason X. Prochaska, T. Rastogi, V. Reddy Janga, Josep Sabater, Parikshit Sakurikar, Michael Seifert, L. E. Sherbert, H. Sherwood-Taylor, A. Y. Shih, J. Sick, M. T. Silbiger, Sudheesh Singanamalla, Leo Singer, P. H. Sladen, K. A. Sooley, S. Sornarajah, Ole Streicher, Peter Teuben, Scott Thomas, Grant R. Tremblay, J. Turner, V. Terrón, M. H. van Kerkwijk, A. de la Vega, Laura L. Watkins, B. A. Weaver, J. Whitmore, Julien Woillez, Victor Zabalza 
TL;DR: The Astropy project as discussed by the authors is an open-source and openly developed Python packages that provide commonly-needed functionality to the astronomical community, including the core package Astropy, which serves as the foundation for more specialized projects and packages.
Abstract: The Astropy project supports and fosters the development of open-source and openly-developed Python packages that provide commonly-needed functionality to the astronomical community. A key element of the Astropy project is the core package Astropy, which serves as the foundation for more specialized projects and packages. In this article, we provide an overview of the organization of the Astropy project and summarize key features in the core package as of the recent major release, version 2.0. We then describe the project infrastructure designed to facilitate and support development for a broader ecosystem of inter-operable packages. We conclude with a future outlook of planned new features and directions for the broader Astropy project.

2,286 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the capabilities of the open-knowledge software instrument Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) have been updated to improve numerical energy conservation capabilities, including during mass changes.
Abstract: We update the capabilities of the open-knowledge software instrument Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA). RSP is a new functionality in MESAstar that models the nonlinear radial stellar pulsations that characterize RR Lyrae, Cepheids, and other classes of variable stars. We significantly enhance numerical energy conservation capabilities, including during mass changes. For example, this enables calculations through the He flash that conserve energy to better than 0.001%. To improve the modeling of rotating stars in MESA, we introduce a new approach to modifying the pressure and temperature equations of stellar structure, as well as a formulation of the projection effects of gravity darkening. A new scheme for tracking convective boundaries yields reliable values of the convective core mass and allows the natural emergence of adiabatic semiconvection regions during both core hydrogen- and helium-burning phases. We quantify the parallel performance of MESA on current-generation multicore architectures and demonstrate improvements in the computational efficiency of radiative levitation. We report updates to the equation of state and nuclear reaction physics modules. We briefly discuss the current treatment of fallback in core-collapse supernova models and the thermodynamic evolution of supernova explosions. We close by discussing the new MESA Testhub software infrastructure to enhance source code development.

601 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the fundamental concepts of micro-lensing planet searches and their practical application are discussed and the strengths and peculiarities of the method flow from the basic manner in which planets are discovered.
Abstract: Unlike most other planet-detection techniques, gravitational microlensing does not rely on detection of photons from either the host or the planet. Rather, planets are discovered by their gravitational perturbation of light from a more distant source. I review the fundamental concepts of microlensing planet searches and discuss their practical application. I show how the strengths and peculiarities of the method flow from the basic manner in which planets are discovered. In particular, microlensing is sensitive to very low-mass planets on wide orbits and free-floating planets, and can be used to search for planets orbiting host stars with a broad range of masses and Galactocentric distances. However, microlensing events are rare and cannot be predicted in advance, the majority of the host stars are extremely faint, and the planetary signals typically last less than a day. These strengths motivate microlensing searches as powerful, complementary probes of unexplored parameter space that have already provid...

331 citations

01 Jan 1981
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide an overview of economic analysis techniques and their applicability to software engineering and management, including the major estimation techniques available, the state of the art in algorithmic cost models, and the outstanding research issues in software cost estimation.
Abstract: This paper summarizes the current state of the art and recent trends in software engineering economics. It provides an overview of economic analysis techniques and their applicability to software engineering and management. It surveys the field of software cost estimation, including the major estimation techniques available, the state of the art in algorithmic cost models, and the outstanding research issues in software cost estimation.

283 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed the Cosmic Dawn project, which used the ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory (ESO-Paral Observatory).
Abstract: ERC grant "Cosmic Dawn"; DFG [1573]; National Aeronautics and Space Administration through the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate [NNX08AR22G]; National Science Foundation [AST-1238877]; ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory [092.A-0339(A), 092.A-0150(A), 092.A-0150(B), 093.A-0863(A), 095.A-9001(A), 095.A-0375(A), 095.A-0535(A), 095.A-0535(B), 096.A-0420(A), 096.A-9001(A), 097.A-9001(A), 097.A-0094(A), 097.A-0094(B)]; Leibniz Prize (DFG grant) [HA 1850/28-1]; W. M. Keck Foundation; NFS [AST-1109915]; NSF Telescope System Instrumentation Program (TSIP); Ohio Board of Regents; Ohio State University Office of Research; NSF [AST-9987045]; INSU/CNRS (France); MPG (Germany); IGN (Spain); National Aeronautics and Space Administration

271 citations