scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Radka Obermannova

Bio: Radka Obermannova is an academic researcher from Masaryk University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Ramucirumab & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 44 publications receiving 1789 citations. Previous affiliations of Radka Obermannova include European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In the EU, the highest age-standardised incidence rates for oesophageal cancer are in the Netherlands for men and the UK for women, and variation between countries is high and may reflect different prevalence of risk factors, use of screening and diagnostic methods.

810 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Ramucirumab plus F OLFIRI significantly improved overall survival compared with placebo plus FOLFIRI as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma and toxic effects were manageable.
Abstract: Summary Background Angiogenesis is an important therapeutic target in colorectal carcinoma. Ramucirumab is a human IgG-1 monoclonal antibody that targets the extracellular domain of VEGF receptor 2. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab versus placebo in combination with second-line FOLFIRI (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) for metastatic colorectal cancer in patients with disease progression during or after first-line therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine. Methods Between Dec 14, 2010, and Aug 23, 2013, we enrolled patients into the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 RAISE trial. Eligible patients had disease progression during or within 6 months of the last dose of first-line therapy. Patients were randomised (1:1) via a centralised, interactive voice-response system to receive 8 mg/kg intravenous ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI or matching placebo plus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or death. Randomisation was stratified by region, KRAS mutation status, and time to disease progression after starting first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01183780.ld Findings We enrolled 1072 patients (536 in each group). Median overall survival was 13·3 months (95% CI 12·4–14·5) for patients in the ramucirumab group versus 11·7 months (10·8–12·7) for the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·844 95% CI 0·730–0·976; log-rank p=0·0219). Survival benefit was consistent across subgroups of patients who received ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI. Grade 3 or worse adverse events seen in more than 5% of patients were neutropenia (203 [38%] of 529 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 123 [23%] of 528 in the placebo group, with febrile neutropenia incidence of 18 [3%] vs 13 [2%]), hypertension (59 [11%] vs 15 [3%]), diarrhoea (57 [11%] vs 51 [10%]), and fatigue (61 [12%] vs 41 [8%]). Interpretation Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI significantly improved overall survival compared with placebo plus FOLFIRI as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. No unexpected adverse events were identified and toxic effects were manageable. Funding Eli Lilly.

700 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These data support further clinical assessment of alisertib in patients with solid tumours, particularly those with breast cancer and small-cell lung cancer.
Abstract: Summary Background Alisertib is an investigational, oral, selective inhibitor of aurora kinase A. We aimed to investigate the safety and activity of single-agent alisertib in patients with predefined types of advanced solid tumours. Methods We did a multicentre phase 1/2 study at 40 centres in four countries (Czech Republic, France, Poland, and the USA). Here, we report results from phase 2; enrolment for the study began on Feb 16, 2010, and ended on May 3, 2013. Adult patients were eligible for the study if they had either breast cancer, small-cell lung cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma, or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma that had relapsed or was refractory to chemotherapy. Patients had to have undergone two or fewer previous cytotoxic regimens (four or fewer for breast cancer patients), not including adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatments. Enrolment followed a two-stage design: to proceed to the second stage, two or more objective responses were needed in the first 20 response-assessable patients in each of the five tumour cohorts. Alisertib was administered orally in 21-day cycles at the recommended phase 2 dose of 50 mg twice daily for 7 days followed by a break of 14 days. The protocol-specified primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an objective response, assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 in the response-assessable population (ie, patients with measurable disease who received at least one dose of alisertib and had undergone at least one post-baseline tumour assessment). This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01045421. Findings By May 31, 2013, 249 patients had been treated, 53 with breast cancer, 60 with small-cell lung cancer, 26 with non-small-cell lung cancer, 55 with head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma, and 55 with gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Among response-assessable patients, an objective response was noted in nine (18%, 95% CI 9−32) of 49 women with breast cancer, ten (21%, 10−35) of 48 participants with small-cell lung cancer, one (4%, 0−22) of 23 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, four (9%, 2−21) of 45 people with head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma, and four (9%, 2−20) of 47 individuals with gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma; all were partial responses. Adverse events were similar across tumour types. The most frequent drug-related grade 3–4 adverse events included neutropenia (n=107 [43%]), leukopenia (53 [21%]), and anaemia (26 [10%]). Serious drug-related adverse events were reported in 108 (43%) patients. Interpretation These data support further clinical assessment of alisertib in patients with solid tumours, particularly those with breast cancer and small-cell lung cancer. Funding Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

197 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Charles S. Fuchs1, Kohei Shitara, Maria Di Bartolomeo, Sara Lonardi, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Eric Van Cutsem2, David H. Ilson3, Maria Alsina4, Ian Chau5, Jill Lacy1, Michel Ducreux6, Michel Ducreux7, Guillermo Mendez8, Alejandro Molina Alavez, Daisuke Takahari, Wasat Mansoor, Peter C. Enzinger9, Vera Gorbounova, Zev A. Wainberg10, Susanna Hegewisch-Becker, David Ferry11, Ji Lin11, Roberto Carlesi11, Mayukh Das11, Manish A. Shah12, Manish A. Shah13, Alexander Luft, Nina A. Karaseva, Rubén Dario Kowalyszyn, Carlos Alberto Hernandez, Tibor Csoszi, Ferdinando De Vita, Per Pfeiffer, Naotoshi Sugimoto, Judit Kocsis, Andràs Csilla, György Bodoky, Georgina Garnica Jaliffe, Svetlana Protsenko, A Madi, Elzbieta Wojcik, Baruch Brenner, Gunnar Folprecht, Tomasz Sarosiek, Katriina Peltola, Peter Bono, Hubert Ayala, Giuseppe Aprile, Cardellino Giovanni Gerardo, Fidel David Huitzil Melendez, Alfredo Falcone, Francesco Di Costanzo, Moustapha Tehfe, Laurent Mineur, Pilar Garcia Alfonso, Radka Obermannova, Hélène Senellart, Russell D. Petty, Leslie Samuel, Peter Istvan Acs, Maen A. Hussein, Marina N. Nechaeva, F.L.G. Erdkamp, Elizabeth Won, Johanna C. Bendell, Javier Gallego Plazas, Sylvie Lorenzen, Bohuslav Melichar, Miguel Angel Escudero, Denis Pezet, Jean-Marc Phelip, Diego Lucas Kaen, James A. Jr Reeves, Federico Longo Munoz, Srinivasan Madhusudan, Carlo Barone, Luis Fein, Angel Gomez Villanueva, Mohamed Hebbar, Jana Prausová, Laura Visa Turmo, Joana Vidal Barrull, Mette Karen Yilmaz, Alex Beny, H.M.W. Van Laarhoven, Brian Anthony DiCarlo, Taito Esaki, Kazumasa Fujitani, Karen Geboes, Ravit Geva, Shigenori Kadowaki, Stephen Leong, Nozomu Machida, Moses Sundar Raj, Francisco Javier Ramirez Godinez, Agnes Ruzsa, Hugo Ford, William E. Lawler, Nicolas Robert Maisey, Jiri Petera, Einat Shacham-Shmueli, Isabelle Sinapi, Kensei Yamaguchi, Hiroki Hara, J.T. Beck, Maria Błasińska-Morawiec, Ricardo Villalobos Valencia, Thierry Alcindor, Madhuri Bajaj, Scott M. Berry, Christina Maria Gomez, Daniel Dammrich, Ravindranath Patel, Julien Taieb, A.J. Ten Tije, Ronald L. Burkes, Fernando Cabanillas, Irfan Firdaus, Cynthia Coo Chua, Shuichi Hironaka, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Howard J. Lim, Marianne Nordsmark, Bela Piko, Udit Verma, Jonathan Wadsley, Seigo Yukisawa, Francisco Gutiérrez Delgado, Crystal S. Denlinger, Raija Kallio, Joanna Pikiel, Joanna Wojcik-Tomaszewska, Christine Brezden-Masley, Raymond Jang, Jana Pribylova, Daisuke Sakai, Maria Alejandra Bartoli, Annemieke Cats, M.I. Grootscholten, Robert Andrew Dichmann, Hugo Hool, Walid Shaib, Akihito Tsuji, Marc Van den Eynde, Hector Velez-Cortez, Timothy R. Asmis 
TL;DR: The addition of ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 antagonist monoclonal antibody, to first-line chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
Abstract: Summary Background VEGF and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2)-mediated signalling and angiogenesis can contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of gastric cancer. We aimed to assess whether the addition of ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 antagonist monoclonal antibody, to first-line chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Methods For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 126 centres in 20 countries, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic, HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with an interactive web response system to receive cisplatin (80 mg/m2, on the first day) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, twice daily for 14 days), every 21 days, and either ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. 5-Fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on days 1–5) was permitted in patients unable to take capecitabine. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention to treat in the first 508 patients. We did a sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint, including a central review of CT scans. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02314117. Findings Between Jan 28, 2015, and Sept 16, 2016, 645 patients were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=326) or placebo plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=319). Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab group than the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·753, 95% CI 0·607–0·935, p=0·0106; median progression-free survival 5·7 months [5·5–6·5] vs 5·4 months [4·5–5·7]). A sensitivity analysis based on central independent review of the radiological images did not corroborate the investigator-assessed difference in progression-free survival (HR 0·961, 95% CI 0·768–1·203, p=0·74). There was no difference in overall survival between groups (0·962, 0·801–1·156, p=0·6757; median overall survival 11·2 months [9·9–11·9] in the ramucirumab group vs 10·7 months [9·5–11·9] in the placebo group). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (85 [26%] of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 85 [27%] of 315 in the placebo group), anaemia (39 [12%] vs 44 [14%]), and hypertension (32 [10%] vs 5 [2%]). The incidence of any-grade serious adverse events was 160 (50%) of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group and 149 (47%) of 315 patients in the placebo group. The most common serious adverse events were vomiting (14 [4%] in the ramucirumab group vs 21 [7%] in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (11 [3%] vs 19 [6%]). There were seven deaths in each group, either during study treatment or within 30 days of discontinuing study treatment, which were the result of treatment-related adverse events. In the ramucirumab group, these adverse events were acute kidney injury, cardiac arrest, gastric haemorrhage, peritonitis, pneumothorax, septic shock, and sudden death (n=1 of each). In the placebo group, these adverse events were cerebrovascular accident (n=1), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (n=2), pulmonary embolism (n=2), sepsis (n=1), and small intestine perforation (n=1). Interpretation Although the primary analysis for progression-free survival was statistically significant, this outcome was not confirmed in a sensitivity analysis of progression-free survival by central independent review, and did not improve overall survival. Therefore, the addition of ramucirumab to cisplatin plus fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is not recommended as first-line treatment for this patient population. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.

172 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These ESMO consensus guidelines have been developed based on the current available evidence to provide a series of evidence-based recommendations to assist in the treatment and management of patients with mCRC in this rapidly evolving treatment setting.

2,382 citations

01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: Lymphedema is a common complication after treatment for breast cancer and factors associated with increased risk of lymphedEMA include extent of axillary surgery, axillary radiation, infection, and patient obesity.

1,988 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The role of cell cycle proteins in cancer, the rationale for targeting them in cancer treatment and results of clinical trials, as well as the future therapeutic potential of various cell cycle inhibitors are discussed.
Abstract: Cancer is characterized by uncontrolled tumour cell proliferation resulting from aberrant activity of various cell cycle proteins. Therefore, cell cycle regulators are considered attractive targets in cancer therapy. Intriguingly, animal models demonstrate that some of these proteins are not essential for proliferation of non-transformed cells and development of most tissues. By contrast, many cancers are uniquely dependent on these proteins and hence are selectively sensitive to their inhibition. After decades of research on the physiological functions of cell cycle proteins and their relevance for cancer, this knowledge recently translated into the first approved cancer therapeutic targeting of a direct regulator of the cell cycle. In this Review, we focus on proteins that directly regulate cell cycle progression (such as cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs)), as well as checkpoint kinases, Aurora kinases and Polo-like kinases (PLKs). We discuss the role of cell cycle proteins in cancer, the rationale for targeting them in cancer treatment and results of clinical trials, as well as the future therapeutic potential of various cell cycle inhibitors.

1,250 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This portion of the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer focuses on the use of systemic therapy in metastatic disease and considers treatment history, extent of disease, goals of treatment, the efficacy and toxicity profiles of the regimens, KRAS/NRAS mutational status, and patient comorbidities and preferences.
Abstract: Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecologic malignancy. Ninety percent of vulvar cancers are predominantly squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), which can arise through human papilloma virus (HPV)-dependent and HPV-independent pathways. The NCCN Vulvar Cancer panel is an interdisciplinary group of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions consisting of specialists in gynecological oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and pathology. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Vulvar Cancer provide an evidence- and consensus-based approach for the management of patients with vulvar SCC. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for diagnosis, staging, treatment, and follow-up.

1,167 citations