Ram Bhushan Agrawal

Bio: Ram Bhushan Agrawal is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Binary search algorithm & Crossover. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 2428 citations.

Simulated Binary Crossover for Continuous Search Space.

Abstract: Abst ract . T he success of binary-coded gene t ic algorithms (GA s) in problems having discrete sear ch space largely depends on the coding used to represent the prob lem var iables and on the crossover ope ra tor that propagates buildin g blocks from parent strings to children st rings . In solving optimization problems having continuous search space, binary-coded GAs discr et ize the search space by using a coding of the problem var iables in binary strings. However , t he coding of realvalued vari ables in finit e-length st rings causes a number of difficulties: inability to achieve arbit rary pr ecision in the obtained solution , fixed mapping of problem var iab les, inh eren t Hamming cliff problem associated wit h binary coding, and processing of Holland 's schemata in cont inuous search space. Although a number of real-coded GAs are developed to solve optimization problems having a cont inuous search space, the search powers of these crossover operators are not adequate . In t his paper , t he search power of a crossover operator is defined in terms of the probability of creating an arbitrary child solut ion from a given pair of parent solutions . Motivated by the success of binarycoded GAs in discrete search space problems , we develop a real-coded crossover (which we call the simulated binar y crossover , or SBX) operator whose search power is similar to that of the single-point crossover used in binary-coded GAs . Simulation results on a nu mber of realvalued test problems of varying difficulty and dimensionality suggest t hat the real-cod ed GAs with the SBX operator ar e ab le to perfor m as good or bet ter than binary-cod ed GAs wit h the single-po int crossover. SBX is found to be particularly useful in problems having mult ip le optimal solutions with a narrow global basin an d in prob lems where the lower and upper bo unds of the global optimum are not known a priori. Further , a simulation on a two-var iable blocked function shows that the real-coded GA with SBX work s as suggested by Goldberg

A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II

Abstract: Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) that use non-dominated sorting and sharing have been criticized mainly for: (1) their O(MN/sup 3/) computational complexity (where M is the number of objectives and N is the population size); (2) their non-elitism approach; and (3) the need to specify a sharing parameter. In this paper, we suggest a non-dominated sorting-based MOEA, called NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II), which alleviates all of the above three difficulties. Specifically, a fast non-dominated sorting approach with O(MN/sup 2/) computational complexity is presented. Also, a selection operator is presented that creates a mating pool by combining the parent and offspring populations and selecting the best N solutions (with respect to fitness and spread). Simulation results on difficult test problems show that NSGA-II is able, for most problems, to find a much better spread of solutions and better convergence near the true Pareto-optimal front compared to the Pareto-archived evolution strategy and the strength-Pareto evolutionary algorithm - two other elitist MOEAs that pay special attention to creating a diverse Pareto-optimal front. Moreover, we modify the definition of dominance in order to solve constrained multi-objective problems efficiently. Simulation results of the constrained NSGA-II on a number of test problems, including a five-objective, seven-constraint nonlinear problem, are compared with another constrained multi-objective optimizer, and the much better performance of NSGA-II is observed.

Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms

Abstract: From the Publisher: Evolutionary algorithms are relatively new, but very powerful techniques used to find solutions to many real-world search and optimization problems. Many of these problems have multiple objectives, which leads to the need to obtain a set of optimal solutions, known as effective solutions. It has been found that using evolutionary algorithms is a highly effective way of finding multiple effective solutions in a single simulation run. · Comprehensive coverage of this growing area of research · Carefully introduces each algorithm with examples and in-depth discussion · Includes many applications to real-world problems, including engineering design and scheduling · Includes discussion of advanced topics and future research · Features exercises and solutions, enabling use as a course text or for self-study · Accessible to those with limited knowledge of classical multi-objective optimization and evolutionary algorithms The integrated presentation of theory, algorithms and examples will benefit those working and researching in the areas of optimization, optimal design and evolutionary computing. This text provides an excellent introduction to the use of evolutionary algorithms in multi-objective optimization, allowing use as a graduate course text or for self-study.

SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm

Abstract: The Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA) (Zitzler and Thiele 1999) is a relatively recent technique for finding or approximating the Pareto-optimal set for multiobjective optimization problems. In different studies (Zitzler and Thiele 1999; Zitzler, Deb, and Thiele 2000) SPEA has shown very good performance in comparison to other multiobjective evolutionary algorithms, and therefore it has been a point of reference in various recent investigations, e.g., (Corne, Knowles, and Oates 2000). Furthermore, it has been used in different applications, e.g., (Lahanas, Milickovic, Baltas, and Zamboglou 2001). In this paper, an improved version, namely SPEA2, is proposed, which incorporates in contrast to its predecessor a fine-grained fitness assignment strategy, a density estimation technique, and an enhanced archive truncation method. The comparison of SPEA2 with SPEA and two other modern elitist methods, PESA and NSGA-II, on different test problems yields promising results.

A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimisation: NSGA-II

Abstract: Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms which use non-dominated sorting and sharing have been mainly criticized for their (i) O(MN3) computational complexity (where M is the number of objectives and N is the population size), (ii) non-elitism approach, and (iii) the need for specifying a sharing parameter. In this paper, we suggest a non-dominated sorting based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (we called it the Non-dominated Sorting GA-II or NSGA-II) which alleviates all the above three difficulties. Specifically, a fast non-dominated sorting approach with O(MN2) computational complexity is presented. Second, a selection operator is presented which creates a mating pool by combining the parent and child populations and selecting the best (with respect to fitness and spread) N solutions. Simulation results on five difficult test problems show that the proposed NSGA-II, in most problems, is able to find much better spread of solutions and better convergence near the true Pareto-optimal front compared to PAES and SPEA--two other elitist multi-objective EAs which pay special attention towards creating a diverse Pareto-optimal front. Because of NSGA-II's low computational requirements, elitist approach, and parameter-less sharing approach, NSGA-II should find increasing applications in the years to come.

Differential Evolution: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art

Abstract: Differential evolution (DE) is arguably one of the most powerful stochastic real-parameter optimization algorithms in current use. DE operates through similar computational steps as employed by a standard evolutionary algorithm (EA). However, unlike traditional EAs, the DE-variants perturb the current-generation population members with the scaled differences of randomly selected and distinct population members. Therefore, no separate probability distribution has to be used for generating the offspring. Since its inception in 1995, DE has drawn the attention of many researchers all over the world resulting in a lot of variants of the basic algorithm with improved performance. This paper presents a detailed review of the basic concepts of DE and a survey of its major variants, its application to multiobjective, constrained, large scale, and uncertain optimization problems, and the theoretical studies conducted on DE so far. Also, it provides an overview of the significant engineering applications that have benefited from the powerful nature of DE.