Rammohan Mallipeddi

Bio: Rammohan Mallipeddi is an academic researcher from Kyungpook National University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Evolutionary algorithm & Differential evolution. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 130 publications receiving 4284 citations. Previous affiliations of Rammohan Mallipeddi include Nanyang Technological University.

Differential evolution algorithm with ensemble of parameters and mutation strategies

Abstract: Differential evolution (DE) has attracted much attention recently as an effective approach for solving numerical optimization problems. However, the performance of DE is sensitive to the choice of the mutation strategy and associated control parameters. Thus, to obtain optimal performance, time-consuming parameter tuning is necessary. Different mutation strategies with different parameter settings can be appropriate during different stages of the evolution. In this paper, we propose to employ an ensemble of mutation strategies and control parameters with the DE (EPSDE). In EPSDE, a pool of distinct mutation strategies along with a pool of values for each control parameter coexists throughout the evolution process and competes to produce offspring. The performance of EPSDE is evaluated on a set of bound-constrained problems and is compared with conventional DE and several state-of-the-art parameter adaptive DE variants.

Ensemble of Constraint Handling Techniques

Abstract: During the last three decades, several constraint handling techniques have been developed to be used with evolutionary algorithms (EAs). According to the no free lunch theorem, it is impossible for a single constraint handling technique to outperform all other techniques on every problem. In other words, depending on several factors such as the ratio between feasible search space and the whole search space, multimodality of the problem, the chosen EA, and global exploration/local exploitation stages of the search process, different constraint handling methods can be effective during different stages of the search process. Motivated by these observations, we propose an ensemble of constraint handling techniques (ECHT) to solve constrained real-parameter optimization problems, where each constraint handling method has its own population. A distinguishing feature of the ECHT is the usage of every function call by each population associated with each constraint handling technique. Being a general concept, the ECHT can be realized with any existing EA. In this paper, we present two instantiations of the ECHT using four constraint handling methods with the evolutionary programming and differential evolution as the EAs. Experimental results show that the performance of ECHT is better than each single constraint handling method used to form the ensemble with the respective EA, and competitive to the state-of-the-art algorithms.

A test-suite of non-convex constrained optimization problems from the real-world and some baseline results

Abstract: Real-world optimization problems have been comparatively difficult to solve due to the complex nature of the objective function with a substantial number of constraints. To deal with such problems, several metaheuristics as well as constraint handling approaches have been suggested. To validate the effectiveness and strength, performance of a newly designed approach should be benchmarked by using some complex real-world problems, instead of only the toy problems with synthetic objective functions, mostly arising from the area of numerical analysis. A list of standard real-life problems appears to be the need of the time for benchmarking new algorithms in an efficient and unbiased manner. In this study, a set of 57 real-world Constrained Optimization Problems (COPs) are described and presented as a benchmark suite to validate the COPs. These problems are shown to capture a wide range of difficulties and challenges that arise from the real life optimization scenarios. Three state-of-the-art constrained optimization methods are exhaustively tested on these problems to analyze their hardness. The experimental outcomes reveal that the selected problems are indeed challenging to these algorithms, which have been shown to solve many synthetic benchmark problems easily.

I and i

Abstract: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality. Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …

Differential Evolution: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art

Abstract: Differential evolution (DE) is arguably one of the most powerful stochastic real-parameter optimization algorithms in current use. DE operates through similar computational steps as employed by a standard evolutionary algorithm (EA). However, unlike traditional EAs, the DE-variants perturb the current-generation population members with the scaled differences of randomly selected and distinct population members. Therefore, no separate probability distribution has to be used for generating the offspring. Since its inception in 1995, DE has drawn the attention of many researchers all over the world resulting in a lot of variants of the basic algorithm with improved performance. This paper presents a detailed review of the basic concepts of DE and a survey of its major variants, its application to multiobjective, constrained, large scale, and uncertain optimization problems, and the theoretical studies conducted on DE so far. Also, it provides an overview of the significant engineering applications that have benefited from the powerful nature of DE.

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art

Abstract: A multiobjective optimization problem involves several conflicting objectives and has a set of Pareto optimal solutions. By evolving a population of solutions, multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are able to approximate the Pareto optimal set in a single run. MOEAs have attracted a lot of research effort during the last 20 years, and they are still one of the hottest research areas in the field of evolutionary computation. This paper surveys the development of MOEAs primarily during the last eight years. It covers algorithmic frameworks such as decomposition-based MOEAs (MOEA/Ds), memetic MOEAs, coevolutionary MOEAs, selection and offspring reproduction operators, MOEAs with specific search methods, MOEAs for multimodal problems, constraint handling and MOEAs, computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs), dynamic MOPs, noisy MOPs, combinatorial and discrete MOPs, benchmark problems, performance indicators, and applications. In addition, some future research issues are also presented.

Recent advances in differential evolution – An updated survey

Abstract: Differential Evolution (DE) is arguably one of the most powerful and versatile evolutionary optimizers for the continuous parameter spaces in recent times. Almost 5 years have passed since the first comprehensive survey article was published on DE by Das and Suganthan in 2011. Several developments have been reported on various aspects of the algorithm in these 5 years and the research on and with DE have now reached an impressive state. Considering the huge progress of research with DE and its applications in diverse domains of science and technology, we find that it is a high time to provide a critical review of the latest literatures published and also to point out some important future avenues of research. The purpose of this paper is to summarize and organize the information on these current developments on DE. Beginning with a comprehensive foundation of the basic DE family of algorithms, we proceed through the recent proposals on parameter adaptation of DE, DE-based single-objective global optimizers, DE adopted for various optimization scenarios including constrained, large-scale, multi-objective, multi-modal and dynamic optimization, hybridization of DE with other optimizers, and also the multi-faceted literature on applications of DE. The paper also presents a dozen of interesting open problems and future research issues on DE.