Raul Camposano

Bio: Raul Camposano is an academic researcher from Synopsys. The author has contributed to research in topics: Logic synthesis & Design flow. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 28 publications receiving 744 citations. Previous affiliations of Raul Camposano include IBM & Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.

Synthesizing circuits from behavioural descriptions

Abstract: The authors discuss in detail the synthesis of structures from behavioural domain descriptions. The overall synthesis approach is explained, the techniques and methods used to solve the main problems are discussed, implementation results are given, and experiences with various examples are described. The principal topics that are addressed are design description in the behavioural domain using a formal language, internal representation of the behaviour, synthesis based on data-flow analysis, optimizations and generation of a hardware structure. These techniques were implemented in the Karlsruhe DSL synthesis system. >

Embedded system design

Abstract: In the past decade the main engine of electronic design automation has been the widespread application of ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Present technology supports complete systems on a chip, most often used as so-called embedded systems in an increasing number of applications. Embedded systems pose new design challenges which we believe will be the driving forces of design automation in the years to come. These include the design of electronic systems hardware, embedded software and hardware / software codesign. This paper explores the novel technical challenges in embedded system design and presents experiences and results of the work in this area using the CASTLE system. CASTLE supports the design of complex embedded systems and the design of the required tools. It provides a central design representation, Verilog, VHDL and C/C++ frontends, Hardware generation in VHDL and BLIF, a retargetable compiler backend and several analysis and visualization tools. Two design examples, video compression and a diesel injection control, illustrate the presented concepts.

From behavior to structure: high-level synthesis

Abstract: This paper shows how high-level synthesis bridges the gap between behavioral specifications and hardware structure by automatically generating a circuit description from a netlist. The resulting description can be used for other design automation tools, such as logic synthesis and layout. As opposed to logic synthesis, which optimizes only combinational logic, high-level synthesis deals with memory elements, the interconnection structures, (such as buses and multiplexers), and the sequential aspects of a design. The steps in the process of synthesizing synchronous digital hardware are explained. They consist of compilation, high-level transformations, scheduling, and allocation. Design representation is discussed, and problems remaining to be solved are indicated. >

An industrial view of electronic design automation

Abstract: The automation of the design of electronic systems and circuits [electronic design automation (EDA)] has a history of strong innovation. The EDA business has profoundly influenced the integrated circuit (IC) business and vice-versa. This paper reviews the technologies, algorithms, and methodologies that have been used in EDA tools and the business impact of these technologies. In particular, we focus on four areas that have been key in defining the design methodologies over time: physical design, simulation/verification, synthesis, and test. We then look briefly into the future. Design will evolve toward more software programmability or some other kind of field configurability like field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). We discuss the kinds of tool sets needed to support design in this environment.

VHDL as input for high-level synthesis

Abstract: High-level synthesis is defined, and the feasibility of high-level synthesis from a behavioral, sequential description in VHDL (VHSIC hardware description language) is examined. It is seen that in some cases the semantics and descriptive power of the language create difficulties for high-level synthesis, and in other cases the high-level synthesis framework used imposes limitations. Restrictions in the form of rules are suggested for overcoming these difficulties. It is shown that although VHDL semantics were initially defined in terms of simulation, they do not pose any fundamental problems for high-level synthesis. >

The high-level synthesis of digital systems

Abstract: High-level synthesis systems start with an abstract behavioral specification of a digital system and find a register-transfer level structure that realizes the given behavior. The various tasks involved in developing a register-transfer level structure from an algorithmic level specification are described. In particular, it is shown how the high-level synthesis task can be decomposed into a number of distinct but not independent subtasks. The techniques that have been developed for solving those subtasks are presented. Areas related to high-level synthesis that are still open problems are examined. >

Design of embedded systems: formal models, validation, and synthesis

Abstract: This paper addresses the design of reactive real-time embedded systems. Such systems are often heterogeneous in implementation technologies and design styles, for example by combining hardware application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) with embedded software. The concurrent design process for such embedded systems involves solving the specification, validation, and synthesis problems. We review the variety of approaches to these problems that have been taken.

Hardware/software co-design

Abstract: Most electronic systems, whether self contained or embedded, have a predominant digital component consisting of a hardware platform which executes software application programs. Hardware/software co-design means meeting system level objectives by exploiting the synergism of hardware and software through their concurrent design. Co-design problems have different flavors according to the application domain, implementation technology and design methodology. Digital hardware design has increasingly more similarities to software design. Hardware circuits are often described using modeling or programming languages, and they are validated and implemented by executing software programs, which are sometimes conceived for the specific hardware design. Current integrated circuits can incorporate one (or more) processor core(s) and memory array(s) on a single substrate. These "systems on silicon" exhibit a sizable amount of embedded software, which provides flexibility for product evolution and differentiation purposes. Thus the design of these systems requires designers to be knowledgeable in both hardware and software domains to make good design tradeoffs. The paper introduces various aspects of co-design. We highlight the commonalities and point out the differences in various co-design problems in some application areas. Co-design issues and their relationship to classical system implementation tasks are discussed to help develop a perspective on modern digital system design that relies on computer aided design (CAD) tools and methods.

Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods

Abstract: ion and Compositional Techniques From Asymmetry to Full Symmetry: New Techniques for Symmetry Reduction in Model Checking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 E.Allen Emerson, Richard J. Trefler Automatic Error Correction of Large Circuits Using Boolean Decomposition and Abstraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 Dirk W. Hoffmann, Thomas Kropf Abstract BDDs: A Technique for Using Abstraction in Model Checking . . . 172 Edmund Clarke, Somesh Jha, Yuan Lu, Dong WangBDDs: A Technique for Using Abstraction in Model Checking . . . 172 Edmund Clarke, Somesh Jha, Yuan Lu, Dong Wang Theorem Proving Related Approaches Formal Synthesis at the Algorithmic Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187 Christian Blumenröhr, Viktor Sabelfeld Xs Are for Trajectory Evaluation, Booleans Are for Theorem Proving . . . . . 202 Mark Aagaard, Thomas Melham, John O’Leary Verification of Infinite State Systems by Compositional Model Checking . . 219 K.L.McMillan Symbolic Simulation/Symbolic Traversal Formal Verification of Designs with Complex Control by Symbolic Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 Gerd Ritter, Hans Eveking, Holger Hinrichsen Hints to Accelerate Symbolic Traversal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 Kavita Ravi, Fabio Somenzi Specification Languages and Methodologies Modeling and Checking Networks of Communicating Real-Time Processes . 265 Jürgen Ruf, Thomas Kropf ”Have I Written Enough Properties?” A Method of Comparison between Specification and Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 Sagi Katz, Orna Grumberg, Danny Geist Program Slicing of Hardware Description Languages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298 E.Clarke, M.Fujita, S.P.Rajan, T.Reps, S.Shankar, T.Teitelbaum Table of

Path-based scheduling for synthesis

Abstract: A novel path-based scheduling algorithm is presented. It yields solutions with the minimum number of control steps, taking into account arbitrary constraints that limit the amount of operations in each control step. The result is a finite state machine that implements the control. Although the complexity of the algorithm is proportional to the number of paths in the control-flow graph, it is shown to be practical for large examples with thousands of nodes. >