This study used a multi-criteria analysis to find the optimal material for water pipes in water systems. This paper used FRISCO for calculating the criteria weights and ranking the considered types of pipes. Five different types are considered using 22 criteria. The considered criteria included economic, environmental, and pipe properties. The results showed that the FRISCO method could be used for decision-making in water systems.

https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4491/pdf?version=1677761572

Evaluation of Pipe Materials in Water System Networks Using the Theory of Advanced Multi-Criteria Analysis

Fatigue curves (S–N curves) are presented for high density polyethylene pipes (HDPE, PPI 4710 resin) and for PVC pipes, obtained experimentally in a 100 mm diameter and 300 m long water pipeline with pipe samples of different thicknesses subject to repeated cycles of extreme hydraulic transient pressures, which are continued until the failure of the pipe samples. The pipe samples were used either (1) without alterations, or (2) altered with triangular grooves of different depths machined in its external surface, in order to favor the formation of cracks in those grooved sections. From the experiments, it is confirmed that failures have their origin in the cracks developed in weakened regions of the pipes. It is also confirmed that high density polyethylene pipes have high resistance to fatigue or to the cyclic application of high internal pressures, given the fact that for this material the pipe failures: (1) are localized and limited in length, (2) they occur under pressures much higher than its nominal design resistance for normal operating conditions and (3) they occur under pressures which are also much higher than those allowed by the design standards for the case of maximum hydraulic transient events. On the other hand, the experiments confirmed that: (1) PVC pipes do not have the high resistance to fatigue shown by the polyethylene pipes, and (2) PVC pipe failures are brittle and catastrophic, as they propagate very rapidly until the destruction of the pipe. The two polymers tested, which exhibit such different behavior, have very different glass transition temperatures, 90 °C for PVC and −90 °C for HDPE. When compared with the normal range of ambient temperatures, PVC is always used well below the glass transition temperature, behaving therefore as a glass, and HDPE is always used well above the glass transition temperature, behaving as a rubber.

René Autrique Ruiz

Papers

Laboratory Study of Fatigue in Water Conveying HDPE and PVC Pipes Subject to Extreme Hydraulic Transient Pressures