René Veenstra

TL;DR: It was found that not only victims and bully/victims but bullies as well were disliked and that parenting was unrelated to bullying and victimization once other factors were controlled.

TL;DR: Examining non-response bias by comparing responders and non-responders regarding mental health determinants and outcomes and outcomes, as well as associations between the two concludes that TRAILS provides a solid basis to improve the understanding of the development of mental health during adolescence.

TL;DR: Status goals were assessed in three ways, using dyadic network analysis to analyze the relations and goals among 10-11 and 14-15 year olds in 22 school classes and found that eighth-grade bullies had more direct status goals than fourth- grade bullies, possibly indicating that striving for the popularity component of status increases in early adolescence.

TL;DR: The results suggest clearly diverging temperament profiles for these groups of children, with High-Intensity Pleasure and Shyness steering the conditional probability of internalizing and externalizing problems (direction markers), Frustration mainly being related to maladaptation in general (severity marker), and Fear and Effortful Control being associated with both the severity and the direction ofinternalizing and Externalizing problems, respectively.

TL;DR: The findings of multilevel regression analyses demonstrated that the negative impact of individual bullying on peer acceptance and the positive impact on peer rejection were particularly weakened by bullying by popular adolescents, suggesting that particularly bullying bypopular adolescents is related to the social status attached to bullying.