scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Ricardo Cortes

Bio: Ricardo Cortes is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Antigen. The author has co-authored 1 publications.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The COVISTIXTM rapid antigen test is adequate for examining asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals, including those who have passed the peak of viral shedding, as well as carriers of the highly prevalent Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant.
Abstract: The performance and validity of the COVISTIXTM rapid antigen test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 were evaluated in an unselected population. Additionally, we assessed the influence of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant in the performance of this antigen rapid test. Swab samples were collected at two point-of-care facilities in Mexico City from individuals that were probable COVID-19 cases, as they were either symptomatic or asymptomatic persons at risk of infection due to close contact with SARS-CoV-2 positive cases. Detection of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant was performed in 91 positive cases by Illumina sequencing. Specificity and sensitivity of the COVISTIXTM rapid antigen test was 96% (CI 95% 94–98) and 81% (CI 95% 76–85), respectively. The accuracy parameters were not affected in samples collected after 7 days of symptom onset, and it was possible to detect almost 65% of samples with a Ct-value between 30 and 34. The COVISTIXTM antigen rapid test is highly sensitive (93%; CI 95% 88–98) and specific (98%; CI 95% 97–99) for detecting Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant carriers. The COVISTIXTM rapid antigen test is adequate for examining asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals, including those who have passed the peak of viral shedding, as well as carriers of the highly prevalent Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant.

2 citations

Posted ContentDOI
14 Sep 2021-medRxiv
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the performance and validity of the COVISTIX™ rapid antigen test, for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an unselected population and compare it to Panbio™ Rapid Antigen Test and RT-PCR.
Abstract: Importance A steady increase in acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases worldwide is causing some regions of the world to withstand a third or even fourth wave of contagion. Swift detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is paramount for the containment of cases, prevention of sustained contagion; and most importantly, for the reduction of mortality. Objective To evaluate the performance and validity of the COVISTIX™ rapid antigen test, for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an unselected population and compare it to Panbio™ rapid antigen test and RT-PCR. Design This is comparative effectiveness study; samples were collected at two point-of-care facilities in Mexico City between May and August 2021. Participants Recruited individuals were probable COVID-19 cases, either symptomatic or asymptomatic persons that were at risk of infection due to close contact to SARS-CoV-2 positive cases. Diagnostic intervention RT-PCR was used as gold standard for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs, study subjects were tested in parallel either with the COVISTIX™ or with Panbio™ rapid antigen test. Main outcome Diagnostic performance of the COVISTIX™ assay is adequate in all commers since its accuracy parameters were not affected in samples collected after 7 days of symptom onset, and it detected almost 65% of samples with a Ct-value between 30 and 34. Results For the population tested with COVISTIX™ (n=783), specificity and sensitivity of the was 96.0% (CI95% 94.0-98.0) and 81% (CI95% 76.0-85.0), as for the Panbio™ (n=2202) population, was 99.0% (CI95%: 0.99-1.00) and 62% (CI%: 58.0-64.0%), respectively. Conclusions and relevance The COVISTIX™ rapid antigen test shows a high performance in all comers, thus, this test is also adequate for testing patients who have passed the peak of viral shedding or for asymptomatic patients.

Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines task force as discussed by the authors published the first set of guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 in vitro diagnosis in February 2022, which aimed to delineate the best diagnostic approach for different populations based on current evidence.
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines task force as discussed by the authors published the first set of guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 in vitro diagnosis in February 2022, which aimed to delineate the best diagnostic approach for different populations based on current evidence.