scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Richard Barry

Other affiliations: Max Planck Society
Bio: Richard Barry is an academic researcher from Goddard Space Flight Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Gravitational microlensing & Light curve. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 56 publications receiving 954 citations. Previous affiliations of Richard Barry include Max Planck Society.

Papers published on a yearly basis

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The OGLE-2005-BLG-169Lb planetary system is located toward the Galactic bulge at a distance of 4.4$ kpc and the projected star-planet separation is 3.3$ AU as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: We present Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) observations of the source and lens stars for planetary microlensing event OGLE-2005-BLG-169, which confirm the relative proper motion prediction due to the planetary light curve signal observed for this event. This (and the companion Keck result) provide the first confirmation of a planetary microlensing signal, for which the deviation was only 2%. The follow-up observations determine the flux of the planetary host star in multiple passbands and remove light curve model ambiguity caused by sparse sampling of part of the light curve. This leads to a precise determination of the properties of the OGLE-2005-BLG-169Lb planetary system. Combining the constraints from the microlensing light curve with the photometry and astrometry of the HST/WFC3 data, we find star and planet masses of ${M}_{*}=0.69\pm 0.02{M}_{\odot }$ and ${m}_{{\rm{p}}}=14.1\pm 0.9{M}_{\oplus }$. The planetary microlens system is located toward the Galactic bulge at a distance of ${D}_{L}=4.1\pm 0.4$ kpc and the projected star–planet separation is ${a}_{\perp }=3.5\pm 0.3$ AU, corresponding to a semimajor axis of $a={4.0}_{-0.6}^{+2.2}$ AU.

158 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Calen B. Henderson1, Radosław Poleski2, Radosław Poleski3, Matthew T. Penny2, Rachel Street4, David P. Bennett5, David W. Hogg6, B. Scott Gaudi2, Wei Zhu2, Thomas Barclay7, Geert Barentsen7, Steve B. Howell7, Fergal Mullally7, Andrzej Udalski3, Michał K. Szymański3, Jan Skowron3, Przemek Mróz3, S. Kozłowski3, Łukasz Wyrzykowski3, Paweł Pietrukowicz3, Igor Soszyński3, Krzysztof Ulaczyk3, M. Pawlak3, Takahiro Sumi8, Fumio Abe9, Yuichiro Asakura8, Richard Barry5, Aparna Bhattacharya10, Ian A. Bond11, Martin Donachie12, M. Freeman12, Akihiko Fukui, Yuki Hirao8, Yoshitaka Itow9, Naoki Koshimoto8, Man Cheung Alex Li12, C. H. Ling11, Kimiaki Masuda9, Yutaka Matsubara9, Yasushi Muraki9, Masayuki Nagakane8, Kouji Ohnishi, H. Oyokawa8, Nicholas J. Rattenbury12, To. Saito13, A. Sharan12, Denis J. Sullivan14, Paul J. Tristram, Atsunori Yonehara15, Etienne Bachelet4, D. M. Bramich16, Arnaud Cassan17, Martin Dominik18, R. Figuera Jaimes18, Keith Horne18, M. Hundertmark19, Shude Mao20, Shude Mao21, Shude Mao22, Clément Ranc17, R. W. Schmidt23, Colin Snodgrass24, Iain A. Steele25, Yiannis Tsapras23, Joachim Wambsganss23, Valerio Bozza26, Valerio Bozza27, Martin Burgdorf28, U. G. Jørgensen19, S. Calchi Novati1, S. Calchi Novati27, Simona Ciceri29, Giuseppe D'Ago, Daniel F. Evans30, Frederic V. Hessman31, Tobias C. Hinse32, T.-O. Husser31, Luigi Mancini29, A. Popovas19, Markus Rabus33, Sohrab Rahvar34, Gaetano Scarpetta27, Jesper Skottfelt24, Jesper Skottfelt19, John Southworth30, Eduardo Unda-Sanzana35, Stephen T. Bryson7, Douglas A. Caldwell7, Martin Haas7, K. Larson, K. McCalmont, M. Packard36, C. A. Peterson, D. Putnam, L. H. Reedy36, Stephen J. Ross, J. Van Cleve7, Rachel Akeson1, V. Batista17, J.-P. Beaulieu17, Chas Beichman1, Geoff Bryden1, David R. Ciardi1, Andrew A. Cole37, Ch. Coutures17, Daniel Foreman-Mackey38, P. Fouqué, M. Friedmann39, Christopher R. Gelino1, Shai Kaspi39, Eamonn Kerins21, Heidi Korhonen19, Dustin Lang40, Chien-Hsiu Lee41, Charles H. Lineweaver42, D. Maoz39, J. B. Marquette17, F. Mogavero17, Jérémy Morales43, David M. Nataf42, Richard W. Pogge2, Alexandre Santerne44, Yossi Shvartzvald1, Daisuke Suzuki5, Motohide Tamura45, Patrick Tisserand17, Dun Wang6 
TL;DR: The demographic questions that can be addressed by this program, including the frequency of FFPs and the Galactic distribution of exoplanets, the observational parameters of K2C9, and the array of resources dedicated to concurrent observations are detailed.
Abstract: K2's Campaign 9 (K2C9) will conduct a ~3.7 deg^2 survey toward the Galactic bulge from 2016 April 22 through July 2 that will leverage the spatial separation between K2 and the Earth to facilitate measurement of the microlens parallax πE for ≳170 microlensing events. These will include several that are planetary in nature as well as many short-timescale microlensing events, which are potentially indicative of free-floating planets (FFPs). These satellite parallax measurements will in turn allow for the direct measurement of the masses of and distances to the lensing systems. In this article we provide an overview of the K2C9 space- and ground-based microlensing survey. Specifically, we detail the demographic questions that can be addressed by this program, including the frequency of FFPs and the Galactic distribution of exoplanets, the observational parameters of K2C9, and the array of resources dedicated to concurrent observations. Finally, we outline the avenues through which the larger community can become involved, and generally encourage participation in K2C9, which constitutes an important pathfinding mission and community exercise in anticipation of WFIRST.

73 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the results for four hot-Jupiter systems with near-solar stars, including HAT-P-4, TrES-3, trES-2, and WASP-3.
Abstract: As part of the NASA EPOXI Mission of Opportunity, we observed seven known transiting extrasolar planet systems in order to construct time series photometry of extremely high phase coverage and precision. Here we present the results for four hot-Jupiter systems with near-solar stars?HAT-P-4, TrES-3, TrES-2, and WASP-3. We observe 10 transits of HAT-P-4, estimating the planet radius Rp = 1.332 ? 0.052 R Jup, the stellar radius R = 1.602 ? 0.061?R ?, the inclination i = 89.67 ? 0.30?deg, and the transit duration from first to fourth contact ? = 255.6 ? 1.9 minutes. For TrES-3, we observe seven transits and find Rp = 1.320 ? 0.057 R Jup, R = 0.817 ? 0.022 R ?, i = 81.99 ? 0.30?deg, and ? = 81.9 ? 1.1 minutes. We also note a long-term variability in the TrES-3 light curve, which may be due to star spots. We observe nine transits of TrES-2 and find Rp = 1.169 ? 0.034 R Jup, R = 0.940 ? 0.026 R ?, i = 84.15 ? 0.16 deg, and ? = 107.3 ? 1.1 minutes. Finally, we observe eight transits of WASP-3, finding Rp = 1.385 ? 0.060 R Jup, R = 1.354 ? 0.056 R ?, i = 84.22 ? 0.81 deg, and ? = 167.3 ? 1.3 minutes. We present refined orbital periods and times of transit for each target. We state 95% confidence upper limits on the secondary eclipse depths in our broadband visible bandpass centered on 650 nm. These limits are 0.073% for HAT-P-4, 0.062% for TrES-3, 0.16% for TrES-2, and 0.11% for WASP-3. We combine the TrES-3 secondary eclipse information with the existing published data and confirm that the atmosphere likely does not have a temperature inversion.

63 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Calen B. Henderson1, Radosław Poleski2, Radosław Poleski3, Matthew T. Penny3, Rachel Street4, David P. Bennett5, David W. Hogg6, B. Scott Gaudi3, Wei Zhu3, Thomas Barclay7, Geert Barentsen7, Steve B. Howell7, Fergal Mullally7, Andrzej Udalski2, Michał K. Szymański2, Jan Skowron2, Przemek Mróz2, S. Kozłowski2, Łukasz Wyrzykowski2, Paweł Pietrukowicz2, Igor Soszyński2, Krzysztof Ulaczyk2, M. Pawlak2, Takahiro Sumi8, Fumio Abe9, Yuichiro Asakura8, Richard Barry5, Aparna Bhattacharya10, Ian A. Bond11, Martin Donachie12, M. Freeman12, Akihiko Fukui, Yuki Hirao8, Yoshitaka Itow9, Naoki Koshimoto8, Man Cheung Alex Li12, C. H. Ling11, Kimiaki Masuda9, Yutaka Matsubara9, Yasushi Muraki9, Masayuki Nagakane8, Kouji Ohnishi, H. Oyokawa8, Nicholas J. Rattenbury12, To. Saito13, A. Sharan12, Denis J. Sullivan14, Paul J. Tristram, Atsunori Yonehara15, Etienne Bachelet4, D. M. Bramich16, Arnaud Cassan17, Martin Dominik18, R. Figuera Jaimes18, Keith Horne18, M. Hundertmark19, Shude Mao20, Shude Mao21, Shude Mao22, Clément Ranc17, R. W. Schmidt23, Colin Snodgrass24, Iain A. Steele25, Yiannis Tsapras23, Joachim Wambsganss23, Valerio Bozza26, Valerio Bozza27, Martin Burgdorf28, U. G. Jørgensen19, S. Calchi Novati27, S. Calchi Novati1, Simona Ciceri29, Giuseppe D'Ago, Daniel F. Evans30, Frederic V. Hessman31, Tobias C. Hinse32, T.-O. Husser31, Luigi Mancini29, A. Popovas19, Markus Rabus33, Sohrab Rahvar34, Gaetano Scarpetta27, Jesper Skottfelt24, Jesper Skottfelt19, John Southworth30, Eduardo Unda-Sanzana35, Stephen T. Bryson7, Douglas A. Caldwell7, Martin Haas7, K. Larson, K. McCalmont, M. Packard36, C. A. Peterson, D. Putnam, L. H. Reedy36, Stephen J. Ross, J. Van Cleve7, Rachel Akeson1, V. Batista17, J.-P. Beaulieu17, Chas Beichman1, Geoff Bryden1, David R. Ciardi1, Andrew A. Cole37, Ch. Coutures17, Daniel Foreman-Mackey38, P. Fouqué, M. Friedmann39, Christopher R. Gelino1, Shai Kaspi39, Eamonn Kerins21, Heidi Korhonen19, Dustin Lang40, Chien-Hsiu Lee41, Charles H. Lineweaver42, D. Maoz39, J. B. Marquette17, F. Mogavero17, Jérémy Morales43, David M. Nataf42, Richard W. Pogge3, Alexandre Santerne44, Yossi Shvartzvald1, Daisuke Suzuki5, Motohide Tamura45, Patrick Tisserand17, Dun Wang6 
TL;DR: For example, the $K2$C9 survey as discussed by the authors provides an overview of the demographic questions that can be addressed by this program, including the frequency of FFPs and the Galactic distribution of exoplanets, the observational parameters of the survey, and the array of resources dedicated to concurrent observations.
Abstract: $K2$'s Campaign 9 ($K2$C9) will conduct a $\sim$3.7 deg$^{2}$ survey toward the Galactic bulge from 7/April through 1/July of 2016 that will leverage the spatial separation between $K2$ and the Earth to facilitate measurement of the microlens parallax $\pi_{\rm E}$ for $\gtrsim$127 microlensing events. These will include several that are planetary in nature as well as many short-timescale microlensing events, which are potentially indicative of free-floating planets (FFPs). These satellite parallax measurements will in turn allow for the direct measurement of the masses of and distances to the lensing systems. In this white paper we provide an overview of the $K2$C9 space- and ground-based microlensing survey. Specifically, we detail the demographic questions that can be addressed by this program, including the frequency of FFPs and the Galactic distribution of exoplanets, the observational parameters of $K2$C9, and the array of resources dedicated to concurrent observations. Finally, we outline the avenues through which the larger community can become involved, and generally encourage participation in $K2$C9, which constitutes an important pathfinding mission and community exercise in anticipation of $WFIRST$.

59 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented the discovery and characterization of two ultra-short microlensing events identified in data from the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE) survey, which may have been caused by free-floating or wide-orbit planets.
Abstract: Planet formation theories predict the existence of free-floating planets that have been ejected from their parent systems. Although they emit little or no light, they can be detected during gravitational microlensing events. Microlensing events caused by rogue planets are characterized by very short timescales t E (typically below two days) and small angular Einstein radii θ E (up to several μ as). Here we present the discovery and characterization of two ultra-short microlensing events identified in data from the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE) survey, which may have been caused by free-floating or wide-orbit planets. OGLE-2012-BLG-1323 is one of the shortest events discovered thus far (t E = 0.155 ± 0.005 d, θ E = 2.37 ± 0.10μ as) and was caused by an Earth-mass object in the Galactic disk or a Neptune-mass planet in the Galactic bulge. OGLE-2017-BLG-0560 (t E = 0.905 ± 0.005 d, θ E = 38.7 ± 1.6μ as) was caused by a Jupiter-mass planet in the Galactic disk or a brown dwarf in the bulge. We rule out stellar companions up to a distance of 6.0 and 3.9 au, respectively. We suggest that the lensing objects, whether located on very wide orbits or free-floating, may originate from the same physical mechanism. Although the sample of ultrashort microlensing events is small, these detections are consistent with low-mass wide-orbit or unbound planets being more common than stars in the Milky Way.

59 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book
01 May 2011
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an overview of the solar system and its evolution, including the formation and evolution of stars, asteroids, and free-floating planets, as well as their internal and external structures.
Abstract: 1. Introduction 2. Radial velocities 3. Astrometry 4. Timing 5. Microlensing 6. Transits 7. Imaging 8. Host stars 9. Brown dwarfs and free-floating planets 10. Formation and evolution 11. Interiors and atmospheres 12. The Solar System Appendixes References Index.

527 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recently, the field of exoplanet biosignatures has gained much attention as discussed by the authors, with more than two dozen exoplanets observed today, including hot Jupiters, which are the type of explanets currently most amenable to study.
Abstract: At the dawn of the first discovery of exoplanets orbiting sun-like stars in the mid-1990s, few believed that observations of exoplanet atmospheres would ever be possible After the 2002 Hubble Space Telescope detection of a transiting exoplanet atmosphere, many skeptics discounted it as a one-object, one-method success Nevertheless, the field is now firmly established, with over two dozen exoplanet atmospheres observed today Hot Jupiters are the type of exoplanet currently most amenable to study Highlights include: detection of molecular spectral features; observation of day-night temperature gradients; and constraints on vertical atmospheric structure Atmospheres of giant planets far from their host stars are also being studied with direct imaging The ultimate exoplanet goal is to answer the enigmatic and ancient question, "Are we alone?" via detection of atmospheric biosignatures Two exciting prospects are the immediate focus on transiting super Earths orbiting in the habitable zone of M-dwarfs, and ultimately the spaceborne direct imaging of true Earth analogs

490 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
John Southworth1
TL;DR: In this paper, the physical properties of 32 transiting extrasolar planet and brown-dwarf systems from existing photometric observations and measured spectroscopic parameters are calculated using the JKTEBOP code, with attention paid to the treatment of limb darkening, contaminating light, orbital eccentricity, correlated noise and numerical integration over long exposure times.
Abstract: I calculate the physical properties of 32 transiting extrasolar planet and brown-dwarf systems from existing photometric observations and measured spectroscopic parameters. The systems studied include fifteen observed by the CoRoT satellite, ten by Kepler and five by the Deep Impact spacecraft. Inclusion of the objects studied in previous papers leads to a sample of 58 transiting systems with homogeneously measured properties. The Kepler data include observations from Quarter 2, and my analyses of several of the systems are the first to be based on short-cadence data from this satellite. The light curves are modelled using the JKTEBOP code, with attention paid to the treatment of limb darkening, contaminating light, orbital eccentricity, correlated noise, and numerical integration over long exposure times. The physical properties are derived from the light curve parameters, spectroscopic characteristics of the host star, and constraints from five sets of theoretical stellar model predictions. An alternative approach using a calibration from eclipsing binary star systems is explored and found to give comparable results whilst imposing a much smaller computational burden. My results are in good agreement with published properties for most of the transiting systems, but discrepancies are identified for CoRoT-5, CoRoT-8, CoRoT-13, Kepler-5 and Kepler-7. Many of the errorbars quoted in the literature are underestimated. Refined orbital ephemerides are given for CoRoT-8 and for the Kepler planets. Asteroseismic constraints on the density of the host stars are in good agreement with the photometric equivalents for HD17156 and TrES-2, but not for HAT-P-7 and HAT-P-11. Complete error budgets are generated for each transiting system, allowing identification of the observations best-suited to improve measurements of their physical properties. Whilst most systems would benefit from further photometry and spectroscopy, HD17156, HD80606, HAT-P-7 and TrES-2 are now extremely well characterised. HAT-P-11 is an exceptional candidate for studying starspots. The orbital ephemerides of some transiting systems are becoming uncertain and they should be re-observed in the near future. The primary results from the current work and from previous papers in the series have been placed in an online catalogue, from where they can be obtained in a range of formats for reference and further study. TEPCat is available at http://www.astro.keele.ac.uk/ jkt/tepcat/

464 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Oct 2010-Science
TL;DR: Two Saturn-size planets show variations in the times they take to transit their star due to gravitational interaction, and six radial-velocity observations show that these two planets are the most massive objects orbiting close to the star and substantially improve the estimates of their masses.
Abstract: The Kepler spacecraft is monitoring more than 150,000 stars for evidence of planets transiting those stars. We report the detection of two Saturn-size planets that transit the same Sun-like star, based on 7 months of Kepler observations. Their 19.2- and 38.9-day periods are presently increasing and decreasing at respective average rates of 4 and 39 minutes per orbit; in addition, the transit times of the inner body display an alternating variation of smaller amplitude. These signatures are characteristic of gravitational interaction of two planets near a 2:1 orbital resonance. Six radial-velocity observations show that these two planets are the most massive objects orbiting close to the star and substantially improve the estimates of their masses. After removing the signal of the two confirmed giant planets, we identified an additional transiting super-Earth–size planet candidate with a period of 1.6 days.

443 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that the very hottest transiting giant planets are qualitatively different from the merely hot Jupiters, and propose an explanation of this trend based on how a planet's radiative and advective times scale with temperature.
Abstract: If both the day-side and night-side effective temperatures of a planet can be measured, it is possible to estimate its Bond albedo, 0 0.8 ?m?to estimate day-side effective temperatures, T d, and thermal phase variations?when available?to estimate night-side effective temperature. We strongly rule out the null hypothesis of a single AB and ? for all 24 planets. If we allow each planet to have different parameters, we find that low Bond albedos are favored (AB 2400 K) have low ?, as opposed to the 18 cooler planets, which show a variety of recirculation efficiencies. This hints that the very hottest transiting giant planets are qualitatively different from the merely hot Jupiters. We propose an explanation of this trend based on how a planet's radiative and advective times scale with temperature: both timescales are expected to be shorter for hotter planets, but the temperature dependence of the radiative timescale is stronger, leading to decreased heat recirculation efficiency.

360 citations