Showing papers by "Richard Cole published in 2019"

Balancing the Robustness and Convergence of Tatonnement

Abstract: A major goal in Algorithmic Game Theory is to justify equilibrium concepts from an algorithmic and complexity perspective. One appealing approach is to identify robust natural distributed algorithms that converge quickly to an equilibrium. This paper addresses a lack of robustness in existing convergence results for discrete forms of tatonnement, including the fact that it need not converge when buyers have linear utility functions. This work achieves greater robustness by seeking approximate rather than exact convergence in large market settings. More specifically, this paper shows that for Fisher markets with buyers having CES utility functions, including linear utility functions, tatonnement will converge quickly to an approximate equilibrium (i.e. at a linear rate), modulo a suitable large market assumption. The quality of the approximation is a function of the parameters of the large market assumption.

A Truthful Cardinal Mechanism for One-Sided Matching

Abstract: We revisit the well-studied problem of designing mechanisms for one-sided matching markets, where a set of $n$ agents needs to be matched to a set of $n$ heterogeneous items. Each agent $i$ has a value $v_{i,j}$ for each item $j$, and these values are private information that the agents may misreport if doing so leads to a preferred outcome. Ensuring that the agents have no incentive to misreport requires a careful design of the matching mechanism, and mechanisms proposed in the literature mitigate this issue by eliciting only the \emph{ordinal} preferences of the agents, i.e., their ranking of the items from most to least preferred. However, the efficiency guarantees of these mechanisms are based only on weak measures that are oblivious to the underlying values. In this paper we achieve stronger performance guarantees by introducing a mechanism that truthfully elicits the full \emph{cardinal} preferences of the agents, i.e., all of the $v_{i,j}$ values. We evaluate the performance of this mechanism using the much more demanding Nash bargaining solution as a benchmark, and we prove that our mechanism significantly outperforms all ordinal mechanisms (even non-truthful ones). To prove our approximation bounds, we also study the population monotonicity of the Nash bargaining solution in the context of matching markets, providing both upper and lower bounds which are of independent interest.

On the Existence of Pareto Efficient and Envy Free Allocations.

Abstract: Envy-freeness and Pareto Efficiency are two major goals in welfare economics. The existence of an allocation that satisfies both conditions has been studied for a long time. Whether items are indivisible or divisible, it is impossible to achieve envy-freeness and Pareto Efficiency ex post even in the case of two people and two items. In contrast, in this work, we prove that, for any cardinal utility functions (including complementary utilities for example) and for any number of items and players, there always exists an ex ante mixed allocation which is envy-free and Pareto Efficient, assuming the allowable assignments are closed under swaps, i.e. if given a legal assignment, swapping any two players' allocations produces another legal assignment. The problem remains open in the divisible case. We also investigate the communication complexity for finding a Pareto Efficient and envy-free allocation.