Richard M. Tempero

Bio: Richard M. Tempero is an academic researcher from Boys Town. The author has contributed to research in topics: Lymphatic system & Lymphatic vessel. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 27 publications receiving 1088 citations. Previous affiliations of Richard M. Tempero include University of Washington & University of Nebraska Medical Center.

Tolerance and Immunity to MUC1 in a Human MUC1 Transgenic Murine Model

Abstract: The human epithelial mucin, MUC1, is a large transmembrane glycoprotein that is expressed on most simple epithelia. It is overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated on many human epithelial tumors, including more than 90% of human breast cancers. MUC1 is of interest as an immunotherapy target because patients with breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers have T lymphocytes in their tumor-draining lymph nodes that can be induced to recognize and lyse MUC1-expressing tumor cells. We have produced a transgenic mouse model that expresses the human MUC1 molecule on an inbred C57B1/6 background to investigate the effect of endogenous expression of MUC1 on the ability of mice to generate antitumor immunity to MUC1-expressing tumors. Transgenic mice expressed the human transgene in a pattern and level consistent with that observed in humans. Transgenic mice were tolerant to stimulation by MUC1 as evidenced by the ability of MUC1-expressing tumor cells to grow in these mice, whereas MUC1-expressing cells were eliminated from wild-type mice. Moreover, transgenic mice immunized with MUC1 peptides failed to exhibit immunoglobulin class switching to the IgG subtypes. These data suggest that endogenous expression of MUC1 protein by MUC1 transgenic mice induces T-cell tolerance to stimulation by MUC1. The transgenic mice will provide a useful model to investigate the mechanisms that regulate immunological tolerance to tumor antigens and will facilitate the investigation of anti-MUC1 immunotherapy formulations.

Lymphatic malformations: review of current treatment.

Abstract: Objective Summarize current knowledge of lymphatic malformation medical, sclerotherapy, and surgical treatment; and highlight areas of treatment controversy and treatment difficulty that need improvement. Methods Panel presentation of various aspects of lymphatic malformation treatment. Results The mainstay of lymphatic malformation treatment has been surgical resection, which has been refined through lesion staging and radiographic characterization. Intralesional sclerotherapy in macrocystic lymphatic malformations is effective. Suprahyoid microcystic lymphatic malformations are more difficult to treat than macrocystic lymphatic malformations in the infrahyoid and posterior cervical regions. Bilateral suprahyoid lymphatic malformations require staged treatment to prevent complications. Lymphatic malformation treatment planning is primarily determined by the presence or possibility of functional compromise. Problematic areas include chronic lymphatic malformation inflammation, dental health maintenance, macroglossia, airway obstruction, and dental malocclusion. Conclusions Lymphatic malformation treatment improvements have been made through radiographic characterization and staging of lymphatic malformations. Direct malformation involvement of the upper aerodigestive tract can cause significant functional compromise that is difficult to treat.

Tolerance and immunity to MUC1 in a human MUC1 transgenic murine model

Abstract: The human epithelial mucin, MUC1, is a large transmembrane glycoprotein that is expressed on most simple epithelia. It is overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated on many human epithelial tumors, including more than 90% of human breast cancers. MUC1 is of interest as an immunotherapy target because patients with breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers have T lymphocytes in their tumor-draining lymph nodes that can be induced to recognize and lyse MUC1-expressing tumor cells. We have produced a transgenic mouse model that expresses the human MUC1 molecule on an inbred C57Bl/6 background to investigate the effect of endogenous expression of MUC1 on the ability of mice to generate antitumor immunity to MUC1-expressing tumors. Transgenic mice expressed the human transgene in a pattern and level consistent with that observed in humans. Transgenic mice were tolerant to stimulation by MUC1 as evidenced by the ability of MUC1-expressing tumor cells to grow in these mice, whereas MUC1-expressing cells were eliminated from wild-type mice. Moreover, transgenic mice immunized with MUC1 peptides failed to exhibit immunoglobulin class switching to the IgG subtypes. These data suggest that endogenous expression of MUC1 protein by MUC1 transgenic mice induces T-cell tolerance to stimulation by MUC1. The transgenic mice will provide a useful model to investigate the mechanisms that regulate immunological tolerance to tumor antigens and will facilitate the investigation of anti-MUC1 immunotherapy formulations.

Lymphatic malformations: current cellular and clinical investigations.

Abstract: Objective Summarize current knowledge of lymphatic malformation development, biology, and clinical outcome measures. Methods Panel presentation of lymphatic malformation biology and measurement of head and neck malformation treatment outcomes. Results Characterization of lymphatic malformation endothelial and stromal cells may lead to biologically based treatment. Traditionally, lymphatic malformation treatment outcomes have been measured according to reduction of malformation size. Currently, methods to measure functional outcomes following lymphatic malformation treatment are lacking. This is particularly apparent when the malformation directly involves the upper aerodigestive tract. Conclusions The etiology and pathogenesis of head and neck lymphatic malformations are poorly understood, but understanding is improving through ongoing investigation. Reduction of lymphatic malformation size is generally possible, but further work is necessary to optimize methods for measuring therapeutic outcomes in problematic areas.

CD4+ Lymphocytes Provide MUC1-Specific Tumor Immunity In Vivo That Is Undetectable In Vitro and Is Absent in MUC1 Transgenic Mice

Abstract: A C57BL/6 mouse transgenic for human MUC1 (MUC1.Tg) was developed to evaluate MUC1-specific tumor immunity in an animal that expresses MUC1 as a normal self protein. Previous studies showed that MUC1.Tg mice, challenged with syngeneic tumors expressing MUC1 (B16.MUC1), developed progressively growing MUC1-positive tumors, whereas wild-type C57BL/6 (wt) mice developed MUC1-negative tumors at a significantly slower rate. The results of a limiting dilution CTL frequency assay were not informative, in that similar numbers of MUC1-specific CTL precursors (CTL) were detected in MUC1.Tg and wt mice. Tumor immunity in vivo was characterized by an adoptive transfer method to evaluate the degree of MUC1 or non-MUC1 tumor immunity in wt or MUC1.Tg mice. The results revealed that wt mice developed protective tumor immunity mediated by MUC1-specific CD4+ lymphocytes, while MUC1.Tg mice were functionally tolerant to MUC1 in vivo. The potential of adoptive immunotherapy to provide immunity to tumors expressing MUC1 and to produce undesirable autoimmunity in recipient MUC1.Tg mice expressing MUC1 as a self Ag was evaluated. Adoptive transfer of immune cells from wt mice primed in vivo with B16.MUC1 tumor cells into MUC1.Tg recipients resulted in significant increases in the survival of MUC1.Tg recipients compared with unmanipulated control MUC .Tg mice challenged with B16.MUC1 tumor cells. This response was specific for MUC1 since control tumors developed at equivalent rates in recipient or control MUC1.Tg mice. No gross or histologic evidence of autoimmunity was observed in recipient MUC1.Tg mice, indicating that tumor immune responses mediated by MUC1-specific CD4+ lymphocytes spare nontransformed epithelia-expressing MUC1.

The Biology of Interleukin-2

Abstract: Much data support an essential role for interleukin (IL)-2 in immune tolerance. This idea is much different from the early paradigm in which IL-2 is central for protective immune responses. This change in thinking occurred when a T regulatory cell defect was shown to be responsible for the lethal autoimmunity associated with IL-2/IL-2R deficiency. This realization allowed investigators to explore immune responses in IL-2-nonresponsive mice rendered autoimmune-free. Such studies established that IL-2 sometimes contributes to optimal primary immune responses, but it is not mandatory. Emerging findings, however, suggest an essential role for IL-2 in immune memory. Here, the current understanding of the dual role of IL-2 in maintaining tolerance and contributing to immunity in vivo is reviewed with some emphasis on T regulatory cell production and homeostasis. Also discussed are implications of this new appreciation concerning the immunobiology of IL-2 with respect to targeting IL-2 or its receptor in immunotherapy.

MUC1, the renaissance molecule.

Abstract: MUC1 is a large, heavily glycosylated mucin expressed on the apical surfaces of most simple, secretory epithelia including the mammary gland, gastrointestinal, respiratory, urinary and reproductive tracts. Although MUC1 was thought to be an epithelial-specific protein, it is now known to be expressed on a variety of hematopoietic cells as well. Mucins function in protection and lubrication of epithelial surfaces. Transmembrane mucins, which contain cytoplasmic tail domains, appear to have additional functions through their abilities to interact with many proteins involved in signal transduction and cell adhesion. The goal of this review is to highlight recent discoveries that suggest that MUC1 may be a multifunctional protein, located on the surfaces of cells as a sensor of the environment, poised to signal to the interior when things go awry.

Matrix Metalloproteinases as Therapeutic Targets for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Abstract: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a restrictive lung disease that is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current medical therapies are not fully effective at limiting mortality in patients with IPF, and new therapies are urgently needed. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are proteinases that, together, can degrade all components of the extracellular matrix and numerous nonmatrix proteins. MMPs and their inhibitors, tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs), have been implicated in the pathogenesis of IPF based upon the results of clinical studies reporting elevated levels of MMPs (including MMP-1, MMP-7, MMP-8, and MMP-9) in IPF blood and/or lung samples. Surprisingly, studies of gene-targeted mice in murine models of pulmonary fibrosis (PF) have demonstrated that most MMPs promote (rather than inhibit) the development of PF and have identified diverse mechanisms involved. These mechanisms include MMPs: (1) promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (MMP-3 and MMP-7); (2) increasing lung levels or activity of profibrotic mediators or reducing lung levels of antifibrotic mediators (MMP-3, MMP-7, and MMP-8); (3) promoting abnormal epithelial cell migration and other aberrant repair processes (MMP-3 and MMP-9); (4) inducing the switching of lung macrophage phenotypes from M1 to M2 types (MMP-10 and MMP-28); and (5) promoting fibrocyte migration (MMP-8). Two MMPs, MMP-13 and MMP-19, have antifibrotic activities in murine models of PF, and two MMPs, MMP-1 and MMP-10, have the potential to limit fibrotic responses to injury. Herein, we review what is known about the contributions of MMPs and TIMPs to the pathogenesis of IPF and discuss their potential as therapeutic targets for IPF.