scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Richard Sylvan

Other affiliations: University of Western Australia
Bio: Richard Sylvan is an academic researcher from Australian National University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Relevance logic & Classical logic. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 18 publications receiving 452 citations. Previous affiliations of Richard Sylvan include University of Western Australia.

Papers
More filters
Book
01 Dec 1987
TL;DR: The ontology of scientific realism as discussed by the authors, why moral language is used in moral language, Professor R.H.Hare group morality, Professor Frank Jackson the singularly affecting facts of causation, Dr D.M.Smart and secondary qualities, Professor D.J.Smart, L.C.Armstrong laws coincidences and relations between universals.
Abstract: Smart and the secondary qualities, Professor D.M.Armstrong laws coincidences and relations between universals, Dr L.J.Cohen the ontology of scientific realism, Professor Brian Ellis why moral language?, Professor R.M.Hare group morality, Professor Frank Jackson the singularly affecting facts of causation, Dr D.H.Mellor the diversity of the sciences, Professor Hilary Putnam life's uncertain voyage, Professor Peter Singer replies, Professor J.J.C.Smart.

76 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper provides three different philosophical accounts of the ternary relation that correspond to three conceptions of conditionality that may unify the three given conceptions.
Abstract: One of the most dominant approaches to semantics for relevant (and many paraconsistent) logics is the Routley–Meyer semantics involving a ternary relation on points. To some (many?), this ternary relation has seemed like a technical trick devoid of an intuitively appealing philosophical story that connects it up with conditionality in general. In this paper, we respond to this worry by providing three different philosophical accounts of the ternary relation that correspond to three conceptions of conditionality. We close by briefly discussing a general conception of conditionality that may unify the three given conceptions.

75 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book
10 Dec 1997

2,025 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Wittgenstein's work remains, undeniably, now, that off one of those few few philosophers who will be read by all future generations as mentioned in this paper, regardless of whether it is true or not.
Abstract: Wittgenstein's work remains, undeniably, now, that off one of those few philosophers who will be read by all future generations.

910 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose an objective basis for deciding when an animal is suffering, which includes a wide range of unpleasant emotional states such as fear, boredom, pain, and hunger, and the care of animals can be based on an objective, animal-centered assessment of their needs.
Abstract: To study animal welfare empirically we need an objective basis for deciding when an animal is suffering. Suffering includes a wide range ofunpleasant emotional states such as fear, boredom, pain, and hunger. Suffering has evolved as a mechanism for avoiding sources ofdanger and threats to fitness. Captive animals often suffer in situations in which they are prevented from doing something that they are highly motivated to do. The “price” an animal is prepared to pay to attain or to escape a situation is an index ofhow the animal “feels” about that situation. Withholding conditions or commodities for which an animal shows “inelastic demand” (i.e., for which it continues to work despite increasing costs) is very likely to cause suffering. In designing environments for animals in zoos, farms, and laboratories, priority should be given to features for which animals show inelastic demand. The care ofanimals can thereby be based on an objective, animal-centered assessment of their needs.

820 citations

Book
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: This book introduces an important group of logics that have come to be known under the umbrella term 'susbstructural' and systematically survey the new results and the significant impact that this class oflogics has had on a wide range of fields.
Abstract: This book introduces an important group of logics that have come to be known under the umbrella term 'susbstructural'. Substructural logics have independently led to significant developments in philosophy, computing and linguistics. An Introduction to Substrucural Logics is the first book to systematically survey the new results and the significant impact that this class of logics has had on a wide range of fields.The following topics are covered: * Proof Theory * Propositional Structures * Frames * Decidability * Coda Both students and professors of philosophy, computing, linguistics, and mathematics will find this to be an important addition to their reading.

456 citations

Book
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: I TRUTH 1 Aristotle on the Law of NonContradiction 2 Theories of Truth 3 Trivialism II NEGATION 4 Contradiction 5 Boolean Negation 6 Denial and Rejection III RATIONALITY 7 Rational Belief 8 Belief Revision 9 Consistency and the Empirical Sciences IV LOGIC 10 Logic and Revisability 11 Validity 12 Logical Pluralism
Abstract: I TRUTH 1 Aristotle on the Law of Non-Contradiction 2 Theories of Truth 3 Trivialism II NEGATION 4 Contradiction 5 Boolean Negation 6 Denial and Rejection III RATIONALITY 7 Rational Belief 8 Belief Revision 9 Consistency and the Empirical Sciences IV LOGIC 10 Logic and Revisability 11 Validity 12 Logical Pluralism

353 citations