scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Robert Babuska

Bio: Robert Babuska is an academic researcher from Delft University of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Fuzzy logic & Reinforcement learning. The author has an hindex of 56, co-authored 371 publications receiving 15388 citations. Previous affiliations of Robert Babuska include Carnegie Mellon University & Czech Technical University in Prague.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Direct fuzzy control of the Mamdani type, fuzzy supervised PI control and predictive control based on fuzzy and neural models were applied to a nonlinear pressure process to compare the development time, type and amount of prior information needed for the controller design, the tuning requirements and the closed-loop performance.

51 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A reinforcement learning (RL) approach is introduced into the energy-balancing passivity-based control (EB-PBC) method, which is a form of PBC in which the closed-loop energy is equal to the difference between the stored and supplied energies.
Abstract: Passivity-based control (PBC) for port-Hamiltonian systems provides an intuitive way of achieving stabilization by rendering a system passive with respect to a desired storage function. However, in most instances the control law is obtained without any performance considerations and it has to be calculated by solving a complex partial differential equation (PDE). In order to address these issues we introduce a reinforcement learning (RL) approach into the energy-balancing passivity-based control (EB-PBC) method, which is a form of PBC in which the closed-loop energy is equal to the difference between the stored and supplied energies. We propose a technique to parameterize EB-PBC that preserves the systems’s PDE matching conditions, does not require the specification of a global desired Hamiltonian, includes performance criteria, and is robust. The parameters of the control law are found by using actor-critic (AC) RL, enabling the search for near-optimal control policies satisfying a desired closed-loop energy landscape. The advantage is that the solutions learned can be interpreted in terms of energy shaping and damping injection, which makes it possible to numerically assess stability using passivity theory. From the RL perspective, our proposal allows for the class of port-Hamiltonian systems to be incorporated in the AC framework, speeding up the learning thanks to the resulting parameterization of the policy. The method has been successfully applied to the pendulum swing-up problem in simulations and real-life experiments.

50 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
03 May 2010
TL;DR: This paper presents a unified way of describing distributed implementations of three commonly used nonlinear estimators: the Extended Kalman filter, the Unscented Kalman Filter and the Particle Filter, and proposes new distributed versions of these methods, in which the nonlinearities are locally managed by the various sensors whereas the different estimates are merged based on a weighted average consensus process.
Abstract: Distributed linear estimation theory has received increased attention in recent years due to several promising industrial applications Distributed nonlinear estimation, however is still a relatively unexplored field despite the need in numerous practical situations for techniques that can handle nonlinearities This paper presents a unified way of describing distributed implementations of three commonly used nonlinear estimators: the Extended Kalman Filter, the Unscented Kalman Filter and the Particle Filter Leveraging on the presented framework, we propose new distributed versions of these methods, in which the nonlinearities are locally managed by the various sensors whereas the different estimates are merged based on a weighted average consensus process The proposed versions are shown to outperform the few published ones in two robot localization test cases

48 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An algorithm for incorporating a priori knowledge into data-driven identification of dynamic fuzzy models of the Takagi-Sugeno type and results show that, when the proposed identification algorithm is applied, not only are physically justified models obtained but also the performance of the model-based controller improves with regard to the case where no prior knowledge is involved.
Abstract: This paper presents an algorithm for incorporating a priori knowledge into data-driven identification of dynamic fuzzy models of the Takagi-Sugeno type. Knowledge about the modelled process such as its stability, minimal or maximal static gain, or the settling time of its step response can be translated into inequality constraints on the consequent parameters. By using input-output data, optimal parameter values are then found by means of quadratic programming. The proposed approach has been applied to the identification of a laboratory liquid level process. The obtained fuzzy model has been used in model-based predictive control. Real-time control results show that, when the proposed identification algorithm is applied, not only are physically justified models obtained but also the performance of the model-based controller improves with regard to the case where no prior knowledge is involved.

47 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2006
TL;DR: This paper investigates centralized and decentralized RL, emphasizing the challenges and potential advantages of the latter and illustrated on an example: learning to control a two-link rigid manipulator.
Abstract: Multi-agent systems are rapidly finding applications in a variety of domains, including robotics, distributed control, telecommunications, etc. Learning approaches to multi-agent control, many of them based on reinforcement learning (RL), are investigated in complex domains such as teams of mobile robots. However, the application of decentralized RL to low-level control tasks is not as intensively studied. In this paper, we investigate centralized and decentralized RL, emphasizing the challenges and potential advantages of the latter. These are then illustrated on an example: learning to control a two-link rigid manipulator. Some open issues and future research directions in decentralized RL are outlined

47 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This historical survey compactly summarizes relevant work, much of it from the previous millennium, review deep supervised learning, unsupervised learning, reinforcement learning & evolutionary computation, and indirect search for short programs encoding deep and large networks.

14,635 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis.
Abstract: Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

13,246 citations

01 Apr 2003
TL;DR: The EnKF has a large user group, and numerous publications have discussed applications and theoretical aspects of it as mentioned in this paper, and also presents new ideas and alternative interpretations which further explain the success of the EnkF.
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive presentation and interpretation of the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) and its numerical implementation. The EnKF has a large user group, and numerous publications have discussed applications and theoretical aspects of it. This paper reviews the important results from these studies and also presents new ideas and alternative interpretations which further explain the success of the EnKF. In addition to providing the theoretical framework needed for using the EnKF, there is also a focus on the algorithmic formulation and optimal numerical implementation. A program listing is given for some of the key subroutines. The paper also touches upon specific issues such as the use of nonlinear measurements, in situ profiles of temperature and salinity, and data which are available with high frequency in time. An ensemble based optimal interpolation (EnOI) scheme is presented as a cost-effective approach which may serve as an alternative to the EnKF in some applications. A fairly extensive discussion is devoted to the use of time correlated model errors and the estimation of model bias.

2,975 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article attempts to strengthen the links between the two research communities by providing a survey of work in reinforcement learning for behavior generation in robots by highlighting both key challenges in robot reinforcement learning as well as notable successes.
Abstract: Reinforcement learning offers to robotics a framework and set of tools for the design of sophisticated and hard-to-engineer behaviors. Conversely, the challenges of robotic problems provide both inspiration, impact, and validation for developments in reinforcement learning. The relationship between disciplines has sufficient promise to be likened to that between physics and mathematics. In this article, we attempt to strengthen the links between the two research communities by providing a survey of work in reinforcement learning for behavior generation in robots. We highlight both key challenges in robot reinforcement learning as well as notable successes. We discuss how contributions tamed the complexity of the domain and study the role of algorithms, representations, and prior knowledge in achieving these successes. As a result, a particular focus of our paper lies on the choice between model-based and model-free as well as between value-function-based and policy-search methods. By analyzing a simple problem in some detail we demonstrate how reinforcement learning approaches may be profitably applied, and we note throughout open questions and the tremendous potential for future research.

2,391 citations