scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Robert Babuska

Bio: Robert Babuska is an academic researcher from Delft University of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Fuzzy logic & Reinforcement learning. The author has an hindex of 56, co-authored 371 publications receiving 15388 citations. Previous affiliations of Robert Babuska include Carnegie Mellon University & Czech Technical University in Prague.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recent work focusing on the use of Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy models in combination with MBPC is described, including a branch-and-bound method with iterative grid-size reduction and control based on a local linear model.

139 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Two multiobjective identification algorithms are studied and particular attention is paid to the analysis of conflicts between objectives, and it is shown that such information can be easily computed from the solution of the multiobjectives optimization.
Abstract: The problem of identifying the parameters of the constituent local linear models of Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy models is considered. In order to address the tradeoff between global model accuracy and interpretability of the local models as linearizations of a nonlinear system, two multiobjective identification algorithms are studied. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of conflicts between objectives, and we show that such information can be easily computed from the solution of the multiobjective optimization. This information is useful to diagnose the model and tune the weighting/priorities of the multiobjective optimization. Moreover, the result of the conflict analysis can be used as a constructive tool to modify the fuzzy model structure (including membership functions) in order to meet the multiple objectives. Simple illustrative examples as well as experimental results show the usefulness of the method.

133 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper addresses the optimization in fuzzy model predictive control with four different methods for the construction of the optimization problem, making difference between the cases when a single linear model or a set of linear models are used.
Abstract: This paper addresses the optimization in fuzzy model predictive control. When the prediction model is a nonlinear fuzzy model, nonconvex, time-consuming optimization is necessary, with no guarantee of finding an optimal solution. A possible way around this problem is to linearize the fuzzy model at the current operating point and use linear predictive control (i.e., quadratic programming). For long-range predictive control, however, the influence of the linearization error may significantly deteriorate the performance. In our approach, this is remedied by linearizing the fuzzy model along the predicted input and output trajectories. One can further improve the model prediction by iteratively applying the optimized control sequence to the fuzzy model and linearizing along the so obtained simulated trajectories. Four different methods for the construction of the optimization problem are proposed, making difference between the cases when a single linear model or a set of linear models are used. By choosing an appropriate method, the user can achieve a desired tradeoff between the control performance and the computational load. The proposed techniques have been tested and evaluated using two simulated industrial benchmarks: pH control in a continuous stirred tank reactor and a high-purity distillation column.

131 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper considers optimal output synchronization of heterogeneous linear multi-agent systems and shows that this optimal distributed approach implicitly solves the output regulation equations without actually doing so.

128 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the use of GAs for optimization in nonlinear model-based predictive control, where advanced genetic operators and other new features were introduced to increase the efficiency of the genetic search in order to deal with real-time constraints.

122 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This historical survey compactly summarizes relevant work, much of it from the previous millennium, review deep supervised learning, unsupervised learning, reinforcement learning & evolutionary computation, and indirect search for short programs encoding deep and large networks.

14,635 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis.
Abstract: Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

13,246 citations

01 Apr 2003
TL;DR: The EnKF has a large user group, and numerous publications have discussed applications and theoretical aspects of it as mentioned in this paper, and also presents new ideas and alternative interpretations which further explain the success of the EnkF.
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive presentation and interpretation of the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) and its numerical implementation. The EnKF has a large user group, and numerous publications have discussed applications and theoretical aspects of it. This paper reviews the important results from these studies and also presents new ideas and alternative interpretations which further explain the success of the EnKF. In addition to providing the theoretical framework needed for using the EnKF, there is also a focus on the algorithmic formulation and optimal numerical implementation. A program listing is given for some of the key subroutines. The paper also touches upon specific issues such as the use of nonlinear measurements, in situ profiles of temperature and salinity, and data which are available with high frequency in time. An ensemble based optimal interpolation (EnOI) scheme is presented as a cost-effective approach which may serve as an alternative to the EnKF in some applications. A fairly extensive discussion is devoted to the use of time correlated model errors and the estimation of model bias.

2,975 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article attempts to strengthen the links between the two research communities by providing a survey of work in reinforcement learning for behavior generation in robots by highlighting both key challenges in robot reinforcement learning as well as notable successes.
Abstract: Reinforcement learning offers to robotics a framework and set of tools for the design of sophisticated and hard-to-engineer behaviors. Conversely, the challenges of robotic problems provide both inspiration, impact, and validation for developments in reinforcement learning. The relationship between disciplines has sufficient promise to be likened to that between physics and mathematics. In this article, we attempt to strengthen the links between the two research communities by providing a survey of work in reinforcement learning for behavior generation in robots. We highlight both key challenges in robot reinforcement learning as well as notable successes. We discuss how contributions tamed the complexity of the domain and study the role of algorithms, representations, and prior knowledge in achieving these successes. As a result, a particular focus of our paper lies on the choice between model-based and model-free as well as between value-function-based and policy-search methods. By analyzing a simple problem in some detail we demonstrate how reinforcement learning approaches may be profitably applied, and we note throughout open questions and the tremendous potential for future research.

2,391 citations