From the Publisher:
Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems is a complete andaccessible account of the theoretical foundations and computational methods that underlie plausible reasoning under uncertainty. The author provides a coherent explication of probability as a language for reasoning with partial belief and offers a unifying perspective on other AI approaches to uncertainty, such as the Dempster-Shafer formalism, truth maintenance systems, and nonmonotonic logic. The author distinguishes syntactic and semantic approaches to uncertaintyand offers techniques, based on belief networks, that provide a mechanism for making semantics-based systems operational. Specifically, network-propagation techniques serve as a mechanism for combining the theoretical coherence of probability theory with modern demands of reasoning-systems technology: modular declarative inputs, conceptually meaningful inferences, and parallel distributed computation. Application areas include diagnosis, forecasting, image interpretation, multi-sensor fusion, decision support systems, plan recognition, planning, speech recognitionin short, almost every task requiring that conclusions be drawn from uncertain clues and incomplete information.
Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems will be of special interest to scholars and researchers in AI, decision theory, statistics, logic, philosophy, cognitive psychology, and the management sciences. Professionals in the areas of knowledge-based systems, operations research, engineering, and statistics will find theoretical and computational tools of immediate practical use. The book can also be used as an excellent text for graduate-level courses in AI, operations research, or applied probability.

Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference

Many areas of science depend on exploratory data analysis and visualization. The need to analyze large amounts of multivariate data raises the fundamental problem of dimensionality reduction: how to discover compact representations of high-dimensional data. Here, we introduce locally linear embedding (LLE), an unsupervised learning algorithm that computes low-dimensional, neighborhood-preserving embeddings of high-dimensional inputs. Unlike clustering methods for local dimensionality reduction, LLE maps its inputs into a single global coordinate system of lower dimensionality, and its optimizations do not involve local minima. By exploiting the local symmetries of linear reconstructions, LLE is able to learn the global structure of nonlinear manifolds, such as those generated by images of faces or documents of text.

/pdf/nonlinear-dimensionality-reduction-by-locally-linear-vmiazg4oee.pdf

Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding.

From the Publisher:
With this text, you gain an understanding of the fundamental concepts of algorithms, the very heart of computer science. It introduces the basic data structures and programming techniques often used in efficient algorithms. Covers use of lists, push-down stacks, queues, trees, and graphs. Later chapters go into sorting, searching and graphing algorithms, the string-matching algorithms, and the Schonhage-Strassen integer-multiplication algorithm. Provides numerous graded exercises at the end of each chapter.


0201000296B04062001

The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms

The modern science of networks has brought significant advances to our understanding of complex systems. One of the most relevant features of graphs representing real systems is community structure, or clustering, i. e. the organization of vertices in clusters, with many edges joining vertices of the same cluster and comparatively few edges joining vertices of different clusters. Such clusters, or communities, can be considered as fairly independent compartments of a graph, playing a similar role like, e. g., the tissues or the organs in the human body. Detecting communities is of great importance in sociology, biology and computer science, disciplines where systems are often represented as graphs. This problem is very hard and not yet satisfactorily solved, despite the huge effort of a large interdisciplinary community of scientists working on it over the past few years. We will attempt a thorough exposition of the topic, from the definition of the main elements of the problem, to the presentation of most methods developed, with a special focus on techniques designed by statistical physicists, from the discussion of crucial issues like the significance of clustering and how methods should be tested and compared against each other, to the description of applications to real networks.

/pdf/community-detection-in-graphs-34rogm3r6p.pdf

Community detection in graphs

Since the invention of AVL trees in 1962, a wide variety of ways to balance binary search trees have been proposed. Notable are red-black trees, in which bottom-up rebalancing after an insertion or deletion takes O(1) amortized time and O(1) rotations worst-case. But the design space of balanced trees has not been fully explored. We introduce the rank-balanced tree , a relaxation of AVL trees. Rank-balanced trees can be rebalanced bottom-up after an insertion or deletion in O(1) amortized time and at most two rotations worst-case, in contrast to red-black trees, which need up to three rotations per deletion. Rebalancing can also be done top-down with fixed lookahead in O(1) amortized time. Using a novel analysis that relies on an exponential potential function, we show that both bottom-up and top-down rebalancing modify nodes exponentially infrequently in their heights.

Rank-Balanced Trees

Goldfarb and Hao have proposed a network simplex algorithm that will solve a maximum flow problem on an n-vertex, m-arc network in at most nm pivots and O(n2m) time. In this paper we describe how to implement their algorithm to run in O(nm log n) time by using an extension of the dynamic tree data structure of Sleator and Tarjan. This bound is less than a logarithmic factor larger than that of any other known algorithm for the problem.

Efficiency of the network simplex algorithm for the maximum flow problem

Multigrid methods are powerful techniques to accelerate the solution of computationally-intensive problems arising in a broad range of applications. Used in conjunction with iterative processes for solving partial differential equations, multigrid methods speed up iterative methods by moving the computation from the original mesh covering the problem domain through a series of coarser meshes. But this hierarchical structure leaves domain-parallel versions of the standard multigrid algorithms with a deficiency of parallelism on coarser grids. To compensate, several parallel multigrid strategies with more parallelism, but also more work, have been designed. We examine these parallel strategies and compare them to simpler standard algorithms to try to determine which techniques are more efficient and practical. We consider three parallel multigrid strategies: (1) domain-parallel versions of the standard V-cycle and F-cycle algorithms; (2) a multiple coarse grid algorithm, proposed by Fredrickson and McBryan, which generates several coarse grids for each fine grid; and (3) two Rosendale algorithm, which allow computation on all grids simultaneously. We study an elliptic model problem on simple domains, discretized with finite difference techniques on block-structured meshes in two or three dimensions with up to 106 or 109 points, respectively. We analyze performance using three models of parallel computation: the PRAM and two bridging models. The bridging models reflect the salient characteristics of two kinds of parallel computers: SIMD fine-grain computers, which contain a large number of small (bitserial) processors, and SPMD medium-grain computers, which have a more modest number of powerful (single chip) processors. Our analysis suggests that the standard algorithms are substantially more efficient than algorithms utilizing either parallel strategy. Both parallel strategies need too much extra work to compensate for their extra parallelism. They require a highly impractical number of processors to be competitive with simpler, standard algorithms. The analysis also suggests that the F-cycle, with the appropriate optimization techniques, is more efficient than the V-cycle under a broad range of problem, implementation, and machine characteristics, despite the fact that it exhibits even less parallelism than the V-cycle.

Parallelism in multigrid methods: how much is too much?

Erratum: an O ( n log log n )-time algorithm for triangulating a simple polygon

This is an experimental study of algorithms for the shortest path feasibility problem: Given a directed weighted graph, find a negative cycle or present a short proof that none exists. We study previously known and new algorithms. Our testbed is more extensive than those previously used, including both static and incremental problems, as well as worst-case instances. We show that, while no single algorithm dominates, a small subset (including a new algorithm) has very robust performance in practice. Our work advances state of the art in the area.

Robert E. Tarjan

Papers

Rank-Balanced Trees

Efficiency of the network simplex algorithm for the maximum flow problem

Parallelism in multigrid methods: how much is too much?

Erratum: an O ( n log log n )-time algorithm for triangulating a simple polygon

Shortest path feasibility algorithms: an experimental evaluation