Robert J. Lefkowitz

Bio: Robert J. Lefkowitz is an academic researcher from Howard Hughes Medical Institute. The author has contributed to research in topics: Receptor & G protein-coupled receptor. The author has an hindex of 214, co-authored 860 publications receiving 147995 citations. Previous affiliations of Robert J. Lefkowitz include University of Nice Sophia Antipolis & University of Stuttgart.

β-Adrenergic Receptors of Human Lymphocytes Are Unaltered by Hyperthyroidism*

Abstract: Lymphocytes from 12 patients with untreated hyperthyroidism were compared to lymphocytes from age- and sex-matched euthyroid control subjects to test the hypothesis that alterations in β-adrenergic response mechanisms occur in human hyperthyroidism. The binding of (-)[3H]dihydroalprenolol, a compound previously shown in these cells to label binding sites having the characteristics of β-adrenergic receptors,was assayed and no significant difference was found between the two groups. In addition, the accumulation of cAMP in response to isoproterenol was determined by RIA and, again, no difference was found. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 48: 503, 1979)

Mechanisms of Ligand-Induced Desensitization of Beta-Adrenergic Receptors

Abstract: Attenuation of responsiveness to extracellular signal molecules (neurotransmitters, hormones, growth factors, and so on) is a cellular regulatory mechanism commonly observed in organisms from microbes to mammals. In the slime mold Dictyostelium, desensitization to an extracellular signal, cyclic AMP, is programmed to facilitate a periodic synchronous behavior that fosters aggregation within the cellular population (Devreotes and Zigmond, 1988). In the mammalian nervous and endocrine systems, desensitization to the effects of neurotransmitters and hormones may be a mechanism for maintenance of target cell function within normal limits (Perkins et al., 1982; Harden, 1983; Sibley and Lefkowitz, 1985; Benovic et al., 1988)

Two kinases mediate agonist-dependent phosphorylation and desensitization of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor.

Abstract: Binding of the catecholamine agonists epinephrine and norepinephrine to the beta-adrenergic receptor (BAR) rapidly activates adenylate cyclase via the stimulatory guanine nucleotide regulatory protein Gs, and results in rises in cellular levels of cAMP. However, continuous exposure to these agonists leads within minutes to a dampening of the enzymatic response. Both in vivo and in vitro studies have implicated agonist-induced phosphorylation of BAR in this process. These results include the isolation of a novel beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (BARK), which has been shown to preferentially phosphorylate receptors that are occupied by agonist when assessed in vitro. Recent studies in our laboratory have examined the desensitization process in intact cells to determine where on the receptor molecule functionally relevant phosphorylation occurs, and to identify the kinase(s) involved. In one set of studies, site-specific mutagenic techniques with the cloned gene for the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor were utilized to delete putative sites of phosphorylation by BARK and/or the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). Following expression of the mutated receptors in mammalian cells, the cells were challenged with different concentrations of agonist for 10-15 min and the functional and phosphorylation properties of the mutant receptors were then assessed. In another set of studies human A431 cells were permeabilized with low concentrations of digitonin and treated with selective inhibitors of both BARK and PKA. The cells were then exposed to desensitizing concentrations of agonist, and similar measurements performed. Taken together, the results from both sets of studies suggest that exposure of cells to low (nanomolar) concentrations of agonist leads to phosphorylation of the receptor on one or both consensus sites for PKA, and that the predominant effect of this phosphorylation on the adenylyl cyclase response is a loss in sensitivity of the receptor to further stimulation by the agonist. In contrast, exposure of cells to higher (micromolar) concentrations of agonist leads to BAR phosphorylation by both PKA and BARK, the latter on the carboxyl terminal region of the receptor. Phosphorylation of the receptor by both kinases appears to be required for the full desensitization effect seen with the high concentration of agonist, which includes both losses in sensitivity and in the maximal responsiveness of the adenylyl cyclase response upon subsequent challenge with the agonist. Such a dual kinase control of BAR phosphorylation may have important implications for understanding the regulation of desensitization under different physiological circumstances.

疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Abstract: 抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1（PfPMP1）与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用，在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员，通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。

Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans

Abstract: Experimental introduction of RNA into cells can be used in certain biological systems to interfere with the function of an endogenous gene Such effects have been proposed to result from a simple antisense mechanism that depends on hybridization between the injected RNA and endogenous messenger RNA transcripts RNA interference has been used in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to manipulate gene expression Here we investigate the requirements for structure and delivery of the interfering RNA To our surprise, we found that double-stranded RNA was substantially more effective at producing interference than was either strand individually After injection into adult animals, purified single strands had at most a modest effect, whereas double-stranded mixtures caused potent and specific interference The effects of this interference were evident in both the injected animals and their progeny Only a few molecules of injected double-stranded RNA were required per affected cell, arguing against stochiometric interference with endogenous mRNA and suggesting that there could be a catalytic or amplification component in the interference process

How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions.

Abstract: The secretion of glucocorticoids (GCs) is a classic endocrine response to stress. Despite that, it remains controversial as to what purpose GCs serve at such times. One view, stretching back to the time of Hans Selye, posits that GCs help mediate the ongoing or pending stress response, either via basal levels of GCs permitting other facets of the stress response to emerge efficaciously, and/or by stress levels of GCs actively stimulating the stress response. In contrast, a revisionist viewpoint posits that GCs suppress the stress response, preventing it from being pathologically overactivated. In this review, we consider recent findings regarding GC action and, based on them, generate criteria for determining whether a particular GC action permits, stimulates, or suppresses an ongoing stressresponse or, as an additional category, is preparative for a subsequent stressor. We apply these GC actions to the realms of cardiovascular function, fluid volume and hemorrhage, immunity and inflammation, metabolism, neurobiology, and reproductive physiology. We find that GC actions fall into markedly different categories, depending on the physiological endpoint in question, with evidence for mediating effects in some cases, and suppressive or preparative in others. We then attempt to assimilate these heterogeneous GC actions into a physiological whole. (Endocrine Reviews 21: 55‐ 89, 2000)