scispace - formally typeset
R

Robert R. Agne

Researcher at Auburn University

Publications -  11
Citations -  129

Robert R. Agne is an academic researcher from Auburn University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Discourse analysis & Reflective listening. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 11 publications receiving 121 citations. Previous affiliations of Robert R. Agne include University of Alabama.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Reframing practices in moral conflict: interaction problems in the negotiation standoff at Waco

TL;DR: In this paper, an analysis of several telephone conversations between FBI negotiators and David Koresh during the 51-day FBI-Branch Davidian standoff outside Waco, Texas, in 1993 is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Discourse strategies that co-construct relational identities in STEM peer tutoring

TL;DR: In this article, a discourse analysis of the transcribed talk recorded between tutors and students in a university peer tutoring program is presented, focusing on STEM tutoring sessions, showing how tutors, students, and teachers interact with each other.
Journal ArticleDOI

Communication practices of coaches during mediator training: Addressing issues of knowledge and enactment

TL;DR: This paper examined role-played mediation sessions where thirteen professional mediators each provided coaching to two pairs of student trainees who had completed training in interest-based mediation (for a total of twenty-six sessions).
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-Assessment as a Dilemmatic Communicative Practice: Talk among Psychics in Training

TL;DR: This article examined meetings of pedagogical importance in a community whose members are training to become certified psychic readers, where psychics in training report to their peers about the readings they completed earlier that night.
Journal ArticleDOI

The nature of facework in discussion of everyday problems between friends

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined how facework is managed in social support interactions between friends and found that support seekers were most satisfied when support providers minimized the imposition of their advice/suggestd and showed an explicit appreciation for the support seeker's problem.