scispace - formally typeset
R

Rodrigo Benenson

Researcher at Max Planck Society

Publications -  65
Citations -  22139

Rodrigo Benenson is an academic researcher from Max Planck Society. The author has contributed to research in topics: Object detection & Pedestrian detection. The author has an hindex of 46, co-authored 65 publications receiving 16169 citations. Previous affiliations of Rodrigo Benenson include Google & Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding

TL;DR: This work introduces Cityscapes, a benchmark suite and large-scale dataset to train and test approaches for pixel-level and instance-level semantic labeling, and exceeds previous attempts in terms of dataset size, annotation richness, scene variability, and complexity.
Posted Content

The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding

TL;DR: Cityscapes as discussed by the authors is a large-scale dataset for semantic urban scene understanding, consisting of 5000 images with high quality pixel-level annotations and 200,000 additional images with coarse annotations.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Makes for Effective Detection Proposals

TL;DR: An in-depth analysis of twelve proposal methods along with four baselines regarding proposal repeatability, ground truth annotation recall on PASCAL, ImageNet, and MS COCO, and their impact on DPM, R-CNN, and Fast R- CNN detection performance shows that for object detection improving proposal localisation accuracy is as important as improving recall.
Book ChapterDOI

Ten Years of Pedestrian Detection, What Have We Learned?

TL;DR: This work analyzes the remarkable progress of the last decade by dis- cussing the main ideas explored in the 40+ detectors currently present in the Caltech pedestrian detection benchmark to find a new decision forest detector.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Simple Does It: Weakly Supervised Instance and Semantic Segmentation

TL;DR: The authors proposed a weak supervision approach that does not require modification of the segmentation training procedure, and showed that when carefully designing the input labels from given bounding boxes, even a single round of training is enough to improve over previously reported weakly supervised results.