Methods of information geometry

The task of quantizing general relativity raises serious questions about the meaning of the present formulation and interpretation of quantum mechanics when applied to so fundamental a structure as the space-time geometry itself. This paper seeks to clarify the foundations of quantum mechanics. It presents a reformulation of quantum theory in a form believed suitable for application to general relativity. The aim is not to deny or contradict the conventional formulation of quantum theory, which has demonstrated its usefulness in an overwhelming variety of problems, but rather to supply a new, more general and complete formulation, from which the conventional interpretation can be deduced. The relationship of this new formulation to the older formulation is therefore that of a metatheory to a theory, that is, it is an underlying theory in which the nature and consistency, as well as the realm of applicability, of the older theory can be investigated and clarified.

"relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics

The authors review the present status of self-consistent mean-field (SCMF) models for describing nuclear structure and low-energy dynamics. These models are presented as effective energy-density functionals. The three most widely used variants of SCMF's based on a Skyrme energy functional, a Gogny force, and a relativistic mean-field Lagrangian are considered side by side. The crucial role of the treatment of pairing correlations is pointed out in each case. The authors discuss other related nuclear structure models and present several extensions beyond the mean-field model which are currently used. Phenomenological adjustment of the model parameters is discussed in detail. The performance quality of the SCMF model is demonstrated for a broad range of typical applications.

Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure

a ) p. 131 The discussion between eqs. (5.14) and (5.15) is incorrect (dA should be made as large as possible!). b ) p. 256 In the figure, the numbers 6) and 7) occur twice. c ) p. 292 At the end of section 12.5, it should be the space of isospectral 0Hermitian matrices. d ) p. 306 A ”Tr” is missing in eq. (13.43). e ) p. 327, Eq. (14.64b) is 〈Trρ〉B = N(14N+10) (5N+1)(N+3) should be 〈Trρ〉B = 8N+7 (N+2)(N+4)

Geometry of Quantum States: Frontmatter

Soft amplitudes in hot gauge theories: A general analysis

Dissipation in many-body systems: A geometric approach based on information theory

The quantum measurement problem, understanding why a unique outcome is obtained in each individual experiment, is tackled by solving models. After an introduction we review the many dynamical models proposed over the years. A flexible and rather realistic model is introduced, describing the measurement of the $z$-component of a spin through interaction with a magnetic memory simulated by a Curie--Weiss magnet, including $N \gg1$ spins weakly coupled to a phonon bath. Initially prepared in a metastable paramagnetic state, it may transit to its up or down ferromagnetic state, triggered by its coupling with the tested spin, so that its magnetization acts as a pointer. 
A detailed solution of the dynamical equations is worked out. Conditions are found, which ensure that the process satisfies the features of ideal measurements. Various imperfections are discussed, as well as attempts of incompatible measurements. The first steps consist in the solution of the Hamiltonian dynamics for the spin-apparatus density matrix $D(t)$. On a longer time scale, the trend towards equilibrium of the magnet produces a final state $D(t_{\rm f})$ that involves correlations between the system and the indications of the pointer, thus ensuring registration. A difficulty lies in a quantum ambiguity: There exist many incompatible decompositions of the density matrix $\scriptD(t_{\rm f})$. This difficulty is overcome by dynamics due to suitable interactions within the apparatus. 
Any subset of runs thus reaches over a brief delay a stable state which satisfies the same hierarchic property as in classical probability theory. Standard quantum statistical mechanics alone appears sufficient to explain the occurrence of a unique answer in each run. Finally, pedagogical exercises are proposed while the statistical interpretation is promoted for teaching. [Abridged]

/pdf/understanding-quantum-measurement-from-the-solution-of-1gw2etvqat.pdf

Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models

There exist functions $F(x)$ whose asymptotic expansions, when computed at fixed $x$ and optimal order, seem to converge to a numerical value which deviates significantly from $F(x)$ itself. Several examples are given, showing that this phenomenon is not exceptional, and should occur in quantum theory. In particular, the semiclassical expansion, at large quantum numbers, of levels of the quartic oscillator $V={x}^{4}$ presents such discrepancies, which we explain quantitatively as contributions from classical trajectories for which space and time coordinates become complex.

Roger Balian

Papers

Dissipation in many-body systems: A geometric approach based on information theory

Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models

Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models

Discrepancies from Asymptotic Series and Their Relation to Complex Classical Trajectories.

Static and dynamic variational principles for expectation values of observables