scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Roger Stupp

Bio: Roger Stupp is an academic researcher from Northwestern University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Temozolomide & Glioma. The author has an hindex of 93, co-authored 430 publications receiving 63025 citations. Previous affiliations of Roger Stupp include Merck & Co. & University of St. Gallen.


Papers
More filters
Journal Article
13 Mar 2019-Oncology
TL;DR: This review will focus on clinical developments and management of newly diagnosed disease, including a discussion about the incorporation of molecular features into the classification of glioblastoma.
Abstract: Glioblastoma is an aggressive primary tumor of the central nervous system. This review will focus on clinical developments and management of newly diagnosed disease, including a discussion about the incorporation of molecular features into the classification of glioblastoma. Such advances will continue to shape our thinking about the disease and how to best manage it. With regards to treatment, the role of surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and tumor-treating fields will be presented. Pivotal studies defining our current standard of care will be highlighted, as will key ongoing trials that may influence our management of glioblastoma in the near future.

77 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recent advances in the understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the anti‐cancer effects of NSAIDs and COX‐2 inhibitors have demonstrated that these drugs target both tumor cells and the tumor vasculature.
Abstract: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and specific inhibitors of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, are therapeutic groups widely used for the treatment of pain, inflammation and fever. There is growing experimental and clinical evidence indicating NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors also have anti-cancer activity. Epidemiological studies have shown that regular use of Aspirin and other NSAIDs reduces the risk of developing cancer, in particular of the colon. Molecular pathology studies have revealed that COX-2 is expressed by cancer cells and cells of the tumor stroma during tumor progression and in response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Experimental studies have demonstrated that COX-2 over expression promotes tumorigenesis, and that NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors suppress tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Clinical trials have shown that NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors suppress colon polyp formation and malignant progression in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome. Recent advances in the understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the anti-cancer effects of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors have demonstrated that these drugs target both tumor cells and the tumor vasculature. The therapeutic benefits of COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of human cancer in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy are currently being tested in clinical trials. In this article we will review recent advances in the understanding of the anti-tumor mechanisms of these drugs and discuss their potential application in clinical oncology.

74 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Compounds that act on mechanisms associated with resistance of glioblastoma stem cells show efficacy in mouse models.
Abstract: Compounds that act on mechanisms associated with resistance of glioblastoma stem cells show efficacy in mouse models.

73 citations

Christian Dittrich, Michael P. Kosty1, S. Jezdic2, Doug Pyle3, Rossana Berardi4, Jonas Bergh5, Nagi S. El-Saghir6, Jean Pierre Lotz, Pia Österlund7, Nicholas Pavlidis8, Gunta Purkalne, Ahmad Awada9, Susana Banerjee10, Smita Bhatia11, Jan Bogaerts12, Jan C. Buckner13, Fatima Cardoso, Paolo G. Casali, Edward R. Chu14, Julia Close15, Bertrand Coiffier, Roisin M. Connolly16, Sarah E. Coupland17, Luigi De Petris5, Maria De Santis18, Elisabeth G.E. de Vries19, Don S. Dizon20, Jennifer M. Duff21, Linda R. Duska22, Alexandru Eniu, Marc S. Ernstoff23, Enriqueta Felip24, Martin F. Fey25, Jill Gilbert26, Nicolas Girard, Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans19, Priya K. Gopalan21, Axel Grothey13, Stephen M. Hahn27, Diana L. Hanna28, Christian J. Herold29, Jørn Herrstedt30, Krisztian Homicsko, Dennie V. Jones21, L. Jost, Ulrich Keilholz31, Saad A. Khan32, Alexander Kiss33, Claus Henning Köhne, Rainer Kunstfeld29, Heinz-Josef Lenz28, Stuart M. Lichtman34, Lisa Licitra, Thomas Lion35, Saskia Litière12, Lifang Liu12, Patrick J. Loehrer36, Merry Jennifer Markham21, Ben Markman, Marius E. Mayerhoefer37, Johannes G. Meran, Olivier Michielin38, E.C. Moser39, Giannis Mountzios40, Timothy J. Moynihan13, Torsten O. Nielsen41, Yuichiro Ohe, Kjell Öberg42, Antonio Palumbo43, Fedro A. Peccatori44, Michael Pfeilstöcker, Chandrajit P. Raut45, Scot C. Remick46, Mark E. Robson34, Piotr Rutkowski, Roberto Salgado, Lidia Schapira20, Eva S. Schernhammer37, Martin Schlumberger47, Hans-Joachim Schmoll48, Lowell E. Schnipper49, Cristiana Sessa, Charles L. Shapiro50, Julie Steele1, Cora N. Sternberg, Friedrich Stiefel38, Florian Strasser51, Roger Stupp52, Richard Sullivan, Josep Tabernero24, Luzia Travado39, Marcel Verheij53, Emile E. Voest53, Everett E. Vokes54, Jamie Von Roenn3, Jeffrey S. Weber55, Hans Wildiers56, Yosef Yarden56 
Scripps Health1, European Society for Medical Oncology2, American Society of Clinical Oncology3, Marche Polytechnic University4, Karolinska Institutet5, American University of Beirut6, Helsinki University Central Hospital7, University of Ioannina8, Université libre de Bruxelles9, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust10, University of Alabama at Birmingham11, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer12, Mayo Clinic13, University of Pittsburgh14, Veterans Health Administration15, Johns Hopkins University16, University of Liverpool17, University of Warwick18, University Medical Center Groningen19, Harvard University20, University of Florida21, University of Virginia22, Roswell Park Cancer Institute23, Hebron University24, University Hospital of Bern25, Vanderbilt University26, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center27, University of Southern California28, Vienna General Hospital29, University of Southern Denmark30, Charité31, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center32, University Hospital of Basel33, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center34, Community College of Rhode Island35, Indiana University36, Medical University of Vienna37, University Hospital of Lausanne38, Champalimaud Foundation39, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens40, University of British Columbia41, Uppsala University Hospital42, University of Turin43, European Institute of Oncology44, Brigham and Women's Hospital45, Maine Medical Center46, Institut Gustave Roussy47, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg48, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center49, Mount Sinai Health System50, University of St. Gallen51, University of Zurich52, Netherlands Cancer Institute53, University of Chicago54, New York University55, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven56
01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: A new edition of the ESMO/ASCO Global Curriculum with several new chapters on technical contents such as molecular pathology, translational research or molecular imaging and on conceptual attitudes towards human principles like genetic counselling or survivorship have been integrated in the GC.
Abstract: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) are publishing a new edition of the ESMO/ASCO Global Curriculum (GC) thanks to contribution of 64 ESMO-appointed and 32 ASCO-appointed authors. First published in 2004 and updated in 2010, the GC edition 2016 answers to the need for updated recommendations for the training of physicians in medical oncology by defining the standard to be fulfilled to qualify as medical oncologists. At times of internationalisation of healthcare and increased mobility of patients and physicians, the GC aims to provide state-of-the-art cancer care to all patients wherever they live. Recent progress in the field of cancer research has indeed resulted in diagnostic and therapeutic innovations such as targeted therapies as a standard therapeutic approach or personalised cancer medicine apart from the revival of immunotherapy, requiring specialised training for medical oncology trainees. Thus, several new chapters on technical contents such as molecular pathology, translational research or molecular imaging and on conceptual attitudes towards human principles like genetic counselling or survivorship have been integrated in the GC. The GC edition 2016 consists of 12 sections with 17 subsections, 44 chapters and 35 subchapters, respectively. Besides renewal in its contents, the GC underwent a principal formal change taking into consideration modern didactic principles. It is presented in a template-based format that subcategorises the detailed outcome requirements into learning objectives, awareness, knowledge and skills. Consecutive steps will be those of harmonising and implementing teaching and assessment strategies.

71 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The addition of temozolomide to radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma resulted in a clinically meaningful and statistically significant survival benefit with minimal additional toxicity.
Abstract: methods Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed glioblastoma were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (fractionated focal irradiation in daily fractions of 2 Gy given 5 days per week for 6 weeks, for a total of 60 Gy) or radiotherapy plus continuous daily temozolomide (75 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day, 7 days per week from the first to the last day of radiotherapy), followed by six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (150 to 200 mg per square meter for 5 days during each 28-day cycle). The primary end point was overall survival. results A total of 573 patients from 85 centers underwent randomization. The median age was 56 years, and 84 percent of patients had undergone debulking surgery. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the median survival was 14.6 months with radiotherapy plus temozolomide and 12.1 months with radiotherapy alone. The unadjusted hazard ratio for death in the radiotherapy-plus-temozolomide group was 0.63 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.75; P<0.001 by the log-rank test). The two-year survival rate was 26.5 percent with radiotherapy plus temozolomide and 10.4 percent with radiotherapy alone. Concomitant treatment with radiotherapy plus temozolomide resulted in grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects in 7 percent of patients.

16,653 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute, is the largest population-based registry focused exclusively on primary brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors in the US.
Abstract: The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and National Cancer Institute (NCI), is the largest population-based registry focused exclusively on primary brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors in the United States (US) and represents the entire US population. This report contains the most up-to-date population-based data on primary brain tumors (malignant and non-malignant) and supersedes all previous CBTRUS reports in terms of completeness and accuracy. All rates (incidence and mortality) are age-adjusted using the 2000 US standard population and presented per 100,000 population. The average annual age-adjusted incidence rate (AAAIR) of all malignant and non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors was 23.79 (Malignant AAAIR=7.08, non-Malignant AAAIR=16.71). This rate was higher in females compared to males (26.31 versus 21.09), Blacks compared to Whites (23.88 versus 23.83), and non-Hispanics compared to Hispanics (24.23 versus 21.48). The most commonly occurring malignant brain and other CNS tumor was glioblastoma (14.5% of all tumors), and the most common non-malignant tumor was meningioma (38.3% of all tumors). Glioblastoma was more common in males, and meningioma was more common in females. In children and adolescents (age 0-19 years), the incidence rate of all primary brain and other CNS tumors was 6.14. An estimated 83,830 new cases of malignant and non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors are expected to be diagnosed in the US in 2020 (24,970 malignant and 58,860 non-malignant). There were 81,246 deaths attributed to malignant brain and other CNS tumors between 2013 and 2017. This represents an average annual mortality rate of 4.42. The 5-year relative survival rate following diagnosis of a malignant brain and other CNS tumor was 23.5% and for a non-malignant brain and other CNS tumor was 82.4%.

9,802 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
23 Oct 2008-Nature
TL;DR: The interim integrative analysis of DNA copy number, gene expression and DNA methylation aberrations in 206 glioblastomas reveals a link between MGMT promoter methylation and a hypermutator phenotype consequent to mismatch repair deficiency in treated gliobeasts, demonstrating that it can rapidly expand knowledge of the molecular basis of cancer.
Abstract: Human cancer cells typically harbour multiple chromosomal aberrations, nucleotide substitutions and epigenetic modifications that drive malignant transformation. The Cancer Genome Atlas ( TCGA) pilot project aims to assess the value of large- scale multi- dimensional analysis of these molecular characteristics in human cancer and to provide the data rapidly to the research community. Here we report the interim integrative analysis of DNA copy number, gene expression and DNA methylation aberrations in 206 glioblastomas - the most common type of primary adult brain cancer - and nucleotide sequence aberrations in 91 of the 206 glioblastomas. This analysis provides new insights into the roles of ERBB2, NF1 and TP53, uncovers frequent mutations of the phosphatidylinositol- 3- OH kinase regulatory subunit gene PIK3R1, and provides a network view of the pathways altered in the development of glioblastoma. Furthermore, integration of mutation, DNA methylation and clinical treatment data reveals a link between MGMT promoter methylation and a hypermutator phenotype consequent to mismatch repair deficiency in treated glioblastomas, an observation with potential clinical implications. Together, these findings establish the feasibility and power of TCGA, demonstrating that it can rapidly expand knowledge of the molecular basis of cancer.

6,761 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Benefits of adjuvant temozolomide with radiotherapy lasted throughout 5 years of follow-up, and a benefit of combined therapy was recorded in all clinical prognostic subgroups, including patients aged 60-70 years.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: In 2004, a randomised phase III trial by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC) reported improved median and 2-year survival for patients with glioblastoma treated with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide and radiotherapy. We report the final results with a median follow-up of more than 5 years. METHODS: Adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were randomly assigned to receive either standard radiotherapy or identical radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide followed by up to six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. The methylation status of the methyl-guanine methyl transferase gene, MGMT, was determined retrospectively from the tumour tissue of 206 patients. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00006353. FINDINGS: Between Aug 17, 2000, and March 22, 2002, 573 patients were assigned to treatment. 278 (97%) of 286 patients in the radiotherapy alone group and 254 (89%) of 287 in the combined-treatment group died during 5 years of follow-up. Overall survival was 27.2% (95% CI 22.2-32.5) at 2 years, 16.0% (12.0-20.6) at 3 years, 12.1% (8.5-16.4) at 4 years, and 9.8% (6.4-14.0) at 5 years with temozolomide, versus 10.9% (7.6-14.8), 4.4% (2.4-7.2), 3.0% (1.4-5.7), and 1.9% (0.6-4.4) with radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7; p<0.0001). A benefit of combined therapy was recorded in all clinical prognostic subgroups, including patients aged 60-70 years. Methylation of the MGMT promoter was the strongest predictor for outcome and benefit from temozolomide chemotherapy. INTERPRETATION: Benefits of adjuvant temozolomide with radiotherapy lasted throughout 5 years of follow-up. A few patients in favourable prognostic categories survive longer than 5 years. MGMT methylation status identifies patients most likely to benefit from the addition of temozolomide. FUNDING: EORTC, NCIC, Nelia and Amadeo Barletta Foundation, Schering-Plough.

6,161 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Patients with glioblastoma containing a methylated MGMT promoter benefited from temozolomide, whereas those who did not have a methylation of theMGMT promoter did notHave such a benefit and were assigned to only radiotherapy.
Abstract: background Epigenetic silencing of the MGMT (O 6 -methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase) DNArepair gene by promoter methylation compromises DNA repair and has been associated with longer survival in patients with glioblastoma who receive alkylating agents. methods We tested the relationship between MGMT silencing in the tumor and the survival of patients who were enrolled in a randomized trial comparing radiotherapy alone with radiotherapy combined with concomitant and adjuvant treatment with temozolomide. The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was determined by methylation-specific polymerase-chain-reaction analysis. results The MGMT promoter was methylated in 45 percent of 206 assessable cases. Irrespective of treatment, MGMT promoter methylation was an independent favorable prognostic factor (P<0.001 by the log-rank test; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.61). Among patients whose tumor contained a methylated MGMT promoter, a survival benefit was observed in patients treated with temozolomide and radiotherapy; their median survival was 21.7 months (95 percent confidence interval, 17.4 to 30.4), as compared with 15.3 months (95 percent confidence interval, 13.0 to 20.9) among those who were assigned to only radiotherapy (P=0.007 by the log-rank test). In the absence of methylation of the MGMT promoter, there was a smaller and statistically insignificant difference in survival between the treatment groups. conclusions Patients with glioblastoma containing a methylated MGMT promoter benefited from temozolomide, whereas those who did not have a methylated MGMT promoter did not have such a benefit.

6,018 citations