scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Roland Barthes

Bio: Roland Barthes is an academic researcher from Kenyon College. The author has contributed to research in topics: Criticism & Pleasure. The author has an hindex of 57, co-authored 195 publications receiving 24529 citations.


Papers
More filters
01 Jan 2013
TL;DR: Agradecemos a los editores de la obra original por autorizar esta republicación en bifurcaciones. as mentioned in this paper, La Torre Eiffel: textos sobre la imagen.
Abstract: Publicado originalmente en Roland Barthes (2011), La Torre Eiffel: textos sobre la imagen. Madrid: Paidos Comunicacion 124, traduccion de Enrique Folch Gonzalez. Agradecemos a los editores de la obra original por autorizar esta republicacion en bifurcaciones.

7 citations

Book
01 Jan 1975

7 citations

Book
05 Mar 2012
TL;DR: Thematic index index index of proper names Facsimile of Notebook 1 (R Roland Barthes Archives, IMEC) ) is an extract from the notebook of.
Abstract: Introduction Map of China Roland Barthes: Notes from a Visit to China Notebook 1 Notebook 2 Notebook 3 Notes for Notebooks 1-3 Notebook 4 Thematic index Index of proper names Facsimile of Notebook 1 (Roland Barthes Archives, IMEC)

7 citations

Book
01 Jan 1982

7 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism are discussed. And the history of European ideas: Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 721-722.

13,842 citations

Book
01 Jan 1991
TL;DR: This article argued that we are modern as long as we split our political process in two - between politics proper, and science and technology, which allowed the formidable expansion of the Western empires.
Abstract: What makes us modern? This is a classic question in philosophy as well as in political science. However it is often raised without including science and technology in its definition. The argument of this book is that we are modern as long as we split our political process in two - between politics proper, and science and technology. This division allows the formidable expansion of the Western empires. However it has become more and more difficult to maintain this distance between science and politics. Hence the postmodern predicament - the feeling that the modern stance is no longer acceptable but that there is no alternative. The solution, advances one of France's leading sociologists of science, is to realize that we have never been modern to begin with. The comparative anthropology this text provides reintroduces science to the fabric of daily life and aims to make us compatible both with our past and with other cultures wrongly called pre-modern.

8,858 citations

Book
18 Aug 2002
TL;DR: Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method as discussed by the authors is a systematic introduction to discourse analysis as a body of theories and methods for social research, which brings together three central approaches, Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory, critical discourse analysis and discursive psychology, to establish a dialogue between different forms of discourse analysis often kept apart by disciplinary boundaries.
Abstract: Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method is a systematic introduction to discourse analysis as a body of theories and methods for social research. It brings together three central approaches, Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory, critical discourse analysis and discursive psychology, in order to establish a dialogue between different forms of discourse analysis often kept apart by disciplinary boundaries. The book introduces the three approaches in a clear and easily comprehensible manner, explaining the distinctive philosophical premises and theoretical perspectives of each approach as well as the methodological guidelines and tools they provide for empirical discourse analysis. The authors also demonstrate the possibilities for combining different discourse analytical and non-discourse analytical approaches in empirical study. Finally, they contextualize discourse analysis within the social constructionist debate about critical social research, rejecting the view that a critical stance is incompatible with social constructionist premises and arguing that critique must be an inherent part of social research.

3,598 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper reviewed and analyzed the emerging network paradigm in organizational research and developed a set of dimensions along which network studies vary, including direction of causality, levels of analysis, explanatory goals, and explanatory mechanisms.

2,845 citations