scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Roman Słowiński

Bio: Roman Słowiński is an academic researcher from Poznań University of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Rough set & Dominance-based rough set approach. The author has an hindex of 78, co-authored 398 publications receiving 30433 citations. Previous affiliations of Roman Słowiński include University of Warsaw & Polish Academy of Sciences.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This approach seems to be of fundamental importance to artificial intelligence (AI) and cognitive sciences, especially in the areas of machine learning, knowledge acquisition, decision analysis, knowledge discovery from databases, expert systems, decision support systems, inductive reasoning, and pattern recognition.
Abstract: Rough set theory, introduced by Zdzislaw Pawlak in the early 1980s [11, 12], is a new mathematical tool to deal with vagueness and uncertainty. This approach seems to be of fundamental importance to artificial intelligence (AI) and cognitive sciences, especially in the areas of machine learning, knowledge acquisition, decision analysis, knowledge discovery from databases, expert systems, decision support systems, inductive reasoning, and pattern recognition.

7,185 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The original rough set approach proved to be very useful in dealing with inconsistency problems following from information granulation, but is failing when preference-orders of attribute domains (criteria) are to be taken into account and it cannot handle inconsistencies following from violation of the dominance principle.

1,544 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: New definitions of lower and upper approximations are proposed, which are basic concepts of the rough set theory and are shown to be more general, in the sense that they are the only ones which can be used for any type of indiscernibility or similarity relation.
Abstract: This paper proposes new definitions of lower and upper approximations, which are basic concepts of the rough set theory. These definitions follow naturally from the concept of ambiguity introduced in this paper. The new definitions are compared to the classical definitions and are shown to be more general, in the sense that they are the only ones which can be used for any type of indiscernibility or similarity relation.

963 citations

Book
01 Aug 1992
TL;DR: The use of 'Rough Sets' Methods to draw Premonitory Factors for Earthquakes by emphasising Gas Geochemistry: The Case of a Low Seismic Activity Context in Belgium J.T. Polkowski is used.
Abstract: Preface Z. Pawlak. Scope and Goals of the Book R. Slowinski. Part I: Applications of the Rough Sets Approach to Intelligent Decision Support. 1. LERS -- A System for Learning from Examples Based on Rough Sets J.W. Grzymala-Busse. 2. Rough Sets in Computer Implemetation of Rule-Based Control of Industrial Process A. Mrozek. 3. Analysis of Diagnostic Symptoms in Vibroacoustic Diagnostic by Means of the Rough Sets Theory R. Nowicki, R. Slowinski, J. Stefanowski. 4. Knowledge-Based Process Control Using Rough Sets A.J. Szladown, W.P. Ziarko. 5. Acquisition of Control Algorithms from Operation Data W.P. Ziarko. 6. Rough Classification of HSV Patients K. Slowinski. 7. Surgical Wound Infection -- Conducive Factors and their Mutual Dependencies M. Kandulski, J. Marciniec, K. Tukallo. 8. Fuzzy Inference System Based on Rough Sets and its Application to Medical Diagnosis H. Tanaka, H. Ishibuchi, T. Shigenaga. 9. Analysis of Structure-Activity Relationships of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds J. Krysinski. 10. Rough Sets-Based Study of Voter Preference in 1988 U.S.A. Presidential Election M. Hadjimichale, A. Wasilewska. 11. An Application of Rough Set Theory in the Control of Water Conditions in a Polder A. Reinhard, B. Stawski, T. Weber, U. Wybraniec-Skardowska. 12. Use of 'Rough Sets' Methods to draw Premonitory Factors for Earthquakes by emphasising Gas Geochemistry: The Case of a Low Seismic Activity Context in Belgium J. Teghem, J.-M. Charlet. 13. Rough Sets and Some Aspects of Logic Synthesis T. Luba,J. Rybnik. Part II: Comparison with Related Methodologies. 1. Putting Rough Sets and Fuzzy Sets together D. Dubois, H. Prade. 2. Applications of Fuzzy-Rough Classification to Logics A. Nakamura. 3. Comparison of the Rough Sets Approach and Probalistic Data Analysis Techniques on a Common Set of Medical Data E. Krusinska, A. Babic, R. Slowinski, J. Stefanowski. 4. Some Experiments to Compare Rough Sets Theory and Ordinal Statistical Methods J. Teghem, M. Benjelloun. 5. Topological and Fuzzy Rough Sets T. Lin. 6. On Convergence of Rough Sets L.T. Polkowski. Part III: Further Developments. 1. Maintenance of Knowledge in Dynamic Systems M.E. Orlowska, M.W. Orlowski. 2. The Discernibility Matrices and Functions in Information Systems A. Skowron, C. Rauszer. 3. Sensitivity of Rough Classification to Changes in Norms of Attributes K. Slowinski, R. Slowinksi. 4. Discretization of Condition Attributes Space A. Lenarcik, Z. Piasta. 5. Consequence Relations and Information Systems D. Vakarelov. 6. Rough Grammar for High Performance Management of Processes on a Distributed System Z.M. Wojcik, B.E. Wojcik. 7. Learning Classification Rules from Database in the Context of Knowledge-Acquisition and Representation R. Yasdi. 8. 'RoughDAS' and 'RoughClass' Software Implementations of the Rough Sets Approach R. Slowinski, J. Stefanowski. Appendix: Glossary of Basic Concepts. Subject Index.

875 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis.
Abstract: Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

13,246 citations

Christopher M. Bishop1
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Probability distributions of linear models for regression and classification are given in this article, along with a discussion of combining models and combining models in the context of machine learning and classification.
Abstract: Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.

10,141 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The wrapper method searches for an optimal feature subset tailored to a particular algorithm and a domain and compares the wrapper approach to induction without feature subset selection and to Relief, a filter approach tofeature subset selection.

8,610 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This approach seems to be of fundamental importance to artificial intelligence (AI) and cognitive sciences, especially in the areas of machine learning, knowledge acquisition, decision analysis, knowledge discovery from databases, expert systems, decision support systems, inductive reasoning, and pattern recognition.
Abstract: Rough set theory, introduced by Zdzislaw Pawlak in the early 1980s [11, 12], is a new mathematical tool to deal with vagueness and uncertainty. This approach seems to be of fundamental importance to artificial intelligence (AI) and cognitive sciences, especially in the areas of machine learning, knowledge acquisition, decision analysis, knowledge discovery from databases, expert systems, decision support systems, inductive reasoning, and pattern recognition.

7,185 citations

BookDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey of the state of the art in multiple criterion decision analysis (MCDA) with an overview of the early history and current state of MCDA.
Abstract: In two volumes, this new edition presents the state of the art in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Reflecting the explosive growth in the field seen during the last several years, the editors not only present surveys of the foundations of MCDA, but look as well at many new areas and new applications. Individual chapter authors are among the most prestigious names in MCDA research, and combined their chapters bring the field completely up to date. Part I of the book considers the history and current state of MCDA, with surveys that cover the early history of MCDA and an overview that discusses the “pre-theoretical” assumptions of MCDA. Part II then presents the foundations of MCDA, with individual chapters that provide a very exhaustive review of preference modeling, along with a chapter devoted to the axiomatic basis of the different models that multiple criteria preferences. Part III looks at outranking methods, with three chapters that consider the ELECTRE methods, PROMETHEE methods, and a look at the rich literature of other outranking methods. Part IV, on Multiattribute Utility and Value Theories (MAUT), presents chapters on the fundamentals of this approach, the very well known UTA methods, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and its more recent extension, the Analytic Network Process (ANP), as well as a chapter on MACBETH (Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique). Part V looks at Non-Classical MCDA Approaches, with chapters on risk and uncertainty in MCDA, the decision rule approach to MCDA, the fuzzy integral approach, the verbal decision methods, and a tentative assessment of the role of fuzzy sets in decision analysis. Part VI, on Multiobjective Optimization, contains chapters on recent developments of vector and set optimization, the state of the art in continuous multiobjective programming, multiobjective combinatorial optimization, fuzzy multicriteria optimization, a review of the field of goal programming, interactive methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems, and relationships between MCDA and evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO). Part VII, on Applications, selects some of the most significant areas, including contributions of MCDA in finance, energy planning problems, telecommunication network planning and design, sustainable development, and portfolio analysis. Finally, Part VIII, on MCDM software, presents well known MCDA software packages.

4,055 citations