Ryan B. Jensen

Bio: Ryan B. Jensen is an academic researcher from Yale University. The author has contributed to research in topics: DNA repair & DNA. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 23 publications receiving 1584 citations. Previous affiliations of Ryan B. Jensen include Stanford University & University of California, Davis.

Purified human BRCA2 stimulates RAD51-mediated recombination

Abstract: Mutation of the breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, leads to breast and ovarian cancers. Mechanistic insight into the functions of human BRCA2 has been limited by the difficulty of isolating this large protein (3,418 amino acids). Here we report the purification of full-length BRCA2 and show that it both binds RAD51 and potentiates recombinational DNA repair by promoting assembly of RAD51 onto single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). BRCA2 acts by targeting RAD51 to ssDNA over double-stranded DNA, enabling RAD51 to displace replication protein-A (RPA) from ssDNA and stabilizing RAD51-ssDNA filaments by blocking ATP hydrolysis. BRCA2 does not anneal ssDNA complexed with RPA, implying it does not directly function in repair processes that involve ssDNA annealing. Our findings show that BRCA2 is a key mediator of homologous recombination, and they provide a molecular basis for understanding how this DNA repair process is disrupted by BRCA2 mutations, which lead to chromosomal instability and cancer.

Decreased expression of the DNA mismatch repair gene Mlh1 under hypoxic stress in mammalian cells.

Abstract: The hypoxic tumor microenvironment has been shown to contribute to genetic instability. As one possible mechanism for this effect, we report that expression of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene Mlh1 is specifically reduced in mammalian cells under hypoxia, whereas expression of other MMR genes, including Msh2, Msh6, and Pms2, is not altered at the mRNA level. However, levels of the PMS2 protein are reduced, consistent with destabilization of PMS2 in the absence of its heterodimer partner, MLH1. The hypoxia-induced reduction in Mlh1 mRNA was prevented by the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A, suggesting that hypoxia causes decreased Mlh1 transcription via histone deacetylation. In addition, treatment of cells with the iron chelator desferrioxamine also reduced MLH1 and PMS2 levels, in keeping with low oxygen tension being the stress signal that provokes the altered MMR gene expression. Functional MMR deficiency under hypoxia was detected as induced instability of a (CA)29 dinucleotide repeat and by increased mutagenesis in a chromosomal reporter gene. These results identify a potential new pathway of genetic instability in cancer: hypoxia-induced reduction in the expression of key MMR proteins. In addition, this stress-induced genetic instability may represent a conceptual parallel to the pathway of stationary-phase mutagenesis seen in bacteria.

BRCA1–BARD1 promotes RAD51-mediated homologous DNA pairing

Abstract: The tumour suppressor complex BRCA1-BARD1 functions in the repair of DNA double-stranded breaks by homologous recombination. During this process, BRCA1-BARD1 facilitates the nucleolytic resection of DNA ends to generate a single-stranded template for the recruitment of another tumour suppressor complex, BRCA2-PALB2, and the recombinase RAD51. Here, by examining purified wild-type and mutant BRCA1-BARD1, we show that both BRCA1 and BARD1 bind DNA and interact with RAD51, and that BRCA1-BARD1 enhances the recombinase activity of RAD51. Mechanistically, BRCA1-BARD1 promotes the assembly of the synaptic complex, an essential intermediate in RAD51-mediated DNA joint formation. We provide evidence that BRCA1 and BARD1 are indispensable for RAD51 stimulation. Notably, BRCA1-BARD1 mutants with weakened RAD51 interactions show compromised DNA joint formation and impaired mediation of homologous recombination and DNA repair in cells. Our results identify a late role of BRCA1-BARD1 in homologous recombination, an attribute of the tumour suppressor complex that could be targeted in cancer therapy.

ATM-dependent expression of the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor in a pathway regulating radiation response.

Abstract: The ATM gene is mutated in the syndrome of ataxia telangiectasia (AT), associated with neurologic dysfunction, growth abnormalities, and extreme radiosensitivity. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) is a cell surface receptor with tyrosine kinase activity that can mediate mitogenesis, cell transformation, and inhibition of apoptosis. We report here that AT cells express low levels of IGF-IR and show decreased IGF-IR promoter activity compared with wild-type cells. Complementation of AT cells with the ATM cDNA results in increased IGF-IR promoter activity and elevated IGF-IR levels, whereas expression in wild-type cells of a dominant negative fragment of ATM specifically reduces IGF-IR expression, results consistent with a role for ATM in regulating IGF-IR expression at the level of transcription. When expression of IGF-IR cDNA is forced in AT cells via a heterologous viral promoter, near normal radioresistance is conferred on the cells. Conversely, in ATM cells complemented with the ATM cDNA, specific inhibition of the IGF-IR pathway prevents correction of the radiosensitivity. Taken together, these results establish a fundamental link between ATM function and IGF-IR expression and suggest that reduced expression of IGF-IR contributes to the radiosensitivity of AT cells. In addition, because IGF-I plays a major role in human growth and metabolism and serves as a survival and differentiation factor for developing neuronal tissue, these results may provide a basis for understanding other aspects of the AT syndrome, including the growth abnormalities, insulin resistance, and neurodegeneration.

Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases

Abstract: The genomes of eukaryotic cells are under continuous assault by environmental agents (e.g., UV light and reactive chemicals) as well as the byproducts of normal intracellular metabolism (e.g., reactive oxygen intermediates and inaccurately replicated DNA). Whatever the origin, genetic damage threatens cell survival, and, in metazoans, leads to organ failure, immunodeficiency, cancer, and other pathologic sequelae. To ensure that cells pass accurate copies of their genomes on to the next generation, evolution has overlaid the core cell-cycle machinery with a series of surveillance pathways termed cell-cycle checkpoints. The overall function of these checkpoints is to detect damaged or abnormally structured DNA, and to coordinate cell-cycle progression with DNA repair. Typically, cell-cycle checkpoint activation slows or arrests cell-cycle progression, thereby allowing time for appropriate repair mechanisms to correct genetic lesions before they are passed on to the next generation of daughter cells. In certain cell types, such as thymocytes, checkpoint proteins link DNA strand breaks to apoptotic cell death via induction of p53. Hence, loss of either of two biochemically connected checkpoint kinases, ATM or Chk2, paradoxically increases the resistance of immature (CD4CD8) T cells to ionizing radiation (IR)-induced apoptosis (Xu and Baltimore 1996; Hirao et al. 2000). In a broader context, cell-cycle checkpoints can be envisioned as signal transduction pathways that link the pace of key cell-cycle phase transitions to the timely and accurate completion of prior, contingent events. It is important to recognize that checkpoint surveillance functions are not confined solely to the happenings within the nucleus–extranuclear parameters, such as growth factor availability and cell mass accumulation, also govern the pace of the cell cycle (Stocker and Hafen 2000). However, for the purposes of this review we will focus exclusively on the subset of checkpoints that monitor the status and structure of chromosomal DNA during cell-cycle progression (Fig. 1). These checkpoints contain, as their most proximal signaling elements, sensor proteins that scan chromatin for partially replicated DNA, DNA strand breaks, or other abnormalities, and translate these DNA-derived stimuli into biochemical signals that modulate the functions of specific downstream target proteins. Despite the recent explosion of information regarding the molecular components of cell-cycle checkpoints in eukaryotic cells, we still have only a skeletal understanding of both the identities of the DNA damage sensors and the mechanisms through which they initiate and terminate the activation of checkpoints. However, members of the Rad group of checkpoint proteins, which include Rad17, Rad1, Rad9, Rad26, and Hus1 (nomenclature based on the Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene products) are widely expressed in all eukaryotic cells, and are prime suspects in the lineup of candidate DNA damage sensors (Green et al. 2000; O’Connell et al. 2000). Three of these Rad proteins, Rad1, Rad9, and Hus1, exhibit structural similarity to the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and accumulating evidence supports the idea that this similarity may extend to function as well (Thelen et al. 1999; Burtelow et al. 2000). During DNA replication, PCNA forms a homotrimeric complex that encircles DNA, creating a “sliding clamp” that tethers DNA polymerase to the DNA strand. Rad1, Rad9, and Hus1 are also found as a heterotrimeric complex in intact cells, and it has been postulated that the Rad1–Rad9–Hus1 complex encircles DNA at or near sites of damage to form a checkpoint sliding clamp (CSC) (O’Connell et al. 2000), which could serve as a nucleus for the recruitment of the checkpoint signaling machinery to broken or abnormally structured DNA. The analogy between PCNA and the Rad1–Rad9–Hus1 complex extends even further. The loading of the PCNA clamp onto DNA is controlled by the clamp loading complex, replication factor C (RFC). Interestingly, yet another member of the Rad family, Rad17, bears homology to the RFC subunits and, in fact, associates with RFC subunits to form a putative checkpoint clamp loading complex (CLC) that governs the interaction of the Rad1– Rad9–Hus1 CSC with damaged DNA (Green et al. 2000; O’Connell et al. 2000). Although this model is fascinating, rigorous biochemical evaluations of the interplay between the CLC and CSC complexes, and the interactions of both complexes with damaged chromatin, are needed before the model can be accepted without reservation. Present address: The Burnham Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA E-MAIL abraham@burnham.org; FAX (858) 713-6268. Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/ gad.914401.