scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Ryan Babbush

Bio: Ryan Babbush is an academic researcher from Google. The author has contributed to research in topics: Quantum computer & Qubit. The author has an hindex of 54, co-authored 143 publications receiving 16509 citations. Previous affiliations of Ryan Babbush include Harvard University & Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales.

Papers published on a yearly basis

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an updated version of supplementary information to accompany "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor", an article published in the October 24, 2019 issue of Nature, is presented.
Abstract: This is an updated version of supplementary information to accompany "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor", an article published in the October 24, 2019 issue of Nature. The main article is freely available at this https URL. Summary of changes since arXiv:1910.11333v1 (submitted 23 Oct 2019): added URL for qFlex source code; added Erratum section; added Figure S41 comparing statistical and total uncertainty for log and linear XEB; new References [1,65]; miscellaneous updates for clarity and style consistency; miscellaneous typographical and formatting corrections.

4,873 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Frank Arute1, Kunal Arya1, Ryan Babbush1, Dave Bacon1, Joseph C. Bardin2, Joseph C. Bardin1, Rami Barends1, Rupak Biswas3, Sergio Boixo1, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão1, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão4, David A. Buell1, B. Burkett1, Yu Chen1, Zijun Chen1, Ben Chiaro5, Roberto Collins1, William Courtney1, Andrew Dunsworth1, Edward Farhi1, Brooks Foxen5, Brooks Foxen1, Austin G. Fowler1, Craig Gidney1, Marissa Giustina1, R. Graff1, Keith Guerin1, Steve Habegger1, Matthew P. Harrigan1, Michael J. Hartmann6, Michael J. Hartmann1, Alan Ho1, Markus R. Hoffmann1, Trent Huang1, Travis S. Humble7, Sergei V. Isakov1, Evan Jeffrey1, Zhang Jiang1, Dvir Kafri1, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi1, Julian Kelly1, Paul V. Klimov1, Sergey Knysh1, Alexander N. Korotkov8, Alexander N. Korotkov1, Fedor Kostritsa1, David Landhuis1, Mike Lindmark1, E. Lucero1, Dmitry I. Lyakh7, Salvatore Mandrà3, Jarrod R. McClean1, Matt McEwen5, Anthony Megrant1, Xiao Mi1, Kristel Michielsen9, Kristel Michielsen10, Masoud Mohseni1, Josh Mutus1, Ofer Naaman1, Matthew Neeley1, Charles Neill1, Murphy Yuezhen Niu1, Eric Ostby1, Andre Petukhov1, John Platt1, Chris Quintana1, Eleanor Rieffel3, Pedram Roushan1, Nicholas C. Rubin1, Daniel Sank1, Kevin J. Satzinger1, Vadim Smelyanskiy1, Kevin J. Sung1, Kevin J. Sung11, Matthew D. Trevithick1, Amit Vainsencher1, Benjamin Villalonga12, Benjamin Villalonga1, Theodore White1, Z. Jamie Yao1, Ping Yeh1, Adam Zalcman1, Hartmut Neven1, John M. Martinis5, John M. Martinis1 
24 Oct 2019-Nature
TL;DR: Quantum supremacy is demonstrated using a programmable superconducting processor known as Sycamore, taking approximately 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times, which would take a state-of-the-art supercomputer around ten thousand years to compute.
Abstract: The promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor1. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large computational space. Here we report the use of a processor with programmable superconducting qubits2-7 to create quantum states on 53 qubits, corresponding to a computational state-space of dimension 253 (about 1016). Measurements from repeated experiments sample the resulting probability distribution, which we verify using classical simulations. Our Sycamore processor takes about 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times-our benchmarks currently indicate that the equivalent task for a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer would take approximately 10,000 years. This dramatic increase in speed compared to all known classical algorithms is an experimental realization of quantum supremacy8-14 for this specific computational task, heralding a much-anticipated computing paradigm.

2,527 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Peruzzo et al. as mentioned in this paper developed a variational adiabatic ansatz and explored unitary coupled cluster where they established a connection from second order unitary cluster to universal gate sets through a relaxation of exponential operator splitting.
Abstract: Many quantum algorithms have daunting resource requirements when compared to what is available today. To address this discrepancy, a quantum-classical hybrid optimization scheme known as 'the quantum variational eigensolver' was developed (Peruzzo et al 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4213) with the philosophy that even minimal quantum resources could be made useful when used in conjunction with classical routines. In this work we extend the general theory of this algorithm and suggest algorithmic improvements for practical implementations. Specifically, we develop a variational adiabatic ansatz and explore unitary coupled cluster where we establish a connection from second order unitary coupled cluster to universal gate sets through a relaxation of exponential operator splitting. We introduce the concept of quantum variational error suppression that allows some errors to be suppressed naturally in this algorithm on a pre-threshold quantum device. Additionally, we analyze truncation and correlated sampling in Hamiltonian averaging as ways to reduce the cost of this procedure. Finally, we show how the use of modern derivative free optimization techniques can offer dramatic computational savings of up to three orders of magnitude over previously used optimization techniques.

1,490 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Jarrod R. McClean1, Sergio Boixo1, Vadim Smelyanskiy1, Ryan Babbush1, Hartmut Neven1 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that for a wide class of reasonable parameterized quantum circuits, the probability that the gradient along any reasonable direction is non-zero to some fixed precision is exponentially small as a function of the number of qubits.
Abstract: Many experimental proposals for noisy intermediate scale quantum devices involve training a parameterized quantum circuit with a classical optimization loop. Such hybrid quantum-classical algorithms are popular for applications in quantum simulation, optimization, and machine learning. Due to its simplicity and hardware efficiency, random circuits are often proposed as initial guesses for exploring the space of quantum states. We show that the exponential dimension of Hilbert space and the gradient estimation complexity make this choice unsuitable for hybrid quantum-classical algorithms run on more than a few qubits. Specifically, we show that for a wide class of reasonable parameterized quantum circuits, the probability that the gradient along any reasonable direction is non-zero to some fixed precision is exponentially small as a function of the number of qubits. We argue that this is related to the 2-design characteristic of random circuits, and that solutions to this problem must be studied. Gradient-based hybrid quantum-classical algorithms are often initialised with random, unstructured guesses. Here, the authors show that this approach will fail in the long run, due to the exponentially-small probability of finding a large enough gradient along any direction.

971 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the first electronic structure calculation performed on a quantum computer without exponentially costly precompilation is reported, where a programmable array of superconducting qubits is used to compute the energy surface of molecular hydrogen using two distinct quantum algorithms.
Abstract: We report the first electronic structure calculation performed on a quantum computer without exponentially costly precompilation. We use a programmable array of superconducting qubits to compute the energy surface of molecular hydrogen using two distinct quantum algorithms. First, we experimentally execute the unitary coupled cluster method using the variational quantum eigensolver. Our efficient implementation predicts the correct dissociation energy to within chemical accuracy of the numerically exact result. Second, we experimentally demonstrate the canonical quantum algorithm for chemistry, which consists of Trotterization and quantum phase estimation. We compare the experimental performance of these approaches to show clear evidence that the variational quantum eigensolver is robust to certain errors. This error tolerance inspires hope that variational quantum simulations of classically intractable molecules may be viable in the near future.

925 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

[...]

08 Dec 2001-BMJ
TL;DR: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one, which seems an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Abstract: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality. Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …

33,785 citations

Christopher M. Bishop1
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Probability distributions of linear models for regression and classification are given in this article, along with a discussion of combining models and combining models in the context of machine learning and classification.
Abstract: Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.

10,141 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an updated version of supplementary information to accompany "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor", an article published in the October 24, 2019 issue of Nature, is presented.
Abstract: This is an updated version of supplementary information to accompany "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor", an article published in the October 24, 2019 issue of Nature. The main article is freely available at this https URL. Summary of changes since arXiv:1910.11333v1 (submitted 23 Oct 2019): added URL for qFlex source code; added Erratum section; added Figure S41 comparing statistical and total uncertainty for log and linear XEB; new References [1,65]; miscellaneous updates for clarity and style consistency; miscellaneous typographical and formatting corrections.

4,873 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) technology will be available in the near future as mentioned in this paper, which will be useful tools for exploring many-body quantum physics, and may have other useful applications.
Abstract: Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) technology will be available in the near future. Quantum computers with 50-100 qubits may be able to perform tasks which surpass the capabilities of today's classical digital computers, but noise in quantum gates will limit the size of quantum circuits that can be executed reliably. NISQ devices will be useful tools for exploring many-body quantum physics, and may have other useful applications, but the 100-qubit quantum computer will not change the world right away --- we should regard it as a significant step toward the more powerful quantum technologies of the future. Quantum technologists should continue to strive for more accurate quantum gates and, eventually, fully fault-tolerant quantum computing.

3,898 citations