scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Ryan Womack

Bio: Ryan Womack is an academic researcher from Rutgers University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Data visualization & Information system. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 13 publications receiving 372 citations.

Papers
More filters
01 Jan 2010

301 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Ryan Womack1
04 Dec 2015-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: This study takes a stratified random sample of articles published in 2014 from the top 10 journals in the disciplines of biology, chemistry, mathematics, and physics, as ranked by impact factor, to find that data sharing practices are still relatively rare in these disciplines’ top journals.
Abstract: This study takes a stratified random sample of articles published in 2014 from the top 10 journals in the disciplines of biology, chemistry, mathematics, and physics, as ranked by impact factor. Sampled articles were examined for their reporting of original data or reuse of prior data, and were coded for whether the data was publicly shared or otherwise made available to readers. Other characteristics such as the sharing of software code used for analysis and use of data citation and DOIs for data were examined. The study finds that data sharing practices are still relatively rare in these disciplines’ top journals, but that the disciplines have markedly different practices. Biology top journals share original data at the highest rate, and physics top journals share at the lowest rate. Overall, the study finds that within the top journals, only 13% of articles with original data published in 2014 make the data available to others.

43 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Ryan Womack1
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined three institutional forms of information intermediary: the for-profit firm, the nonprofit organization, and the government agency, using results from the economics and information science literature.

37 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
07 Jan 2015
TL;DR: It is proposed that evaluation, critique, and use of data visualization be the initial focus of education, and some starting points for training in these three areas are discussed.
Abstract: Data visualization has grown in significance and complexity as the quantity of data and the technology supporting it have developed. Understanding and using data visualization is now a core skill that should be incorporated into information literacy goals by librarians and educators. Competency in data visualization is also closely related to data literacy and other quantitative literacies. Undergraduate students and other general learners should be exposed to the fundamentals of data visualization early in their education. This article proposes that evaluation, critique, and use of data visualization be the initial focus of education, and discusses some starting points for training in these three areas.

24 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Ryan Womack1
TL;DR: This study focuses on members of the Association for Research Libraries in the United States and finds the best-fitting models generated by ARL data, NSF data, and the combined data set for both nominal and per capita funding are compared.

7 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Shapiro and Varian as mentioned in this paper reviewed the book "Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy" by Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian and found that it is a good book to read.
Abstract: The article reviews the book “Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy,” by Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian.

1,029 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a method for the first publication of first publication to the Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation (PARE) journal for the purpose of obtaining a first publication license.
Abstract: Copyright is retained by the first or sole author, who grants right of first publication to the Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. Permission is granted to distribute this article for nonprofit, educational purposes if it is copied in its entirety and the journal is credited. PARE has the right to authorize third party reproduction of this article in print, electronic and database forms.

992 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In his seminal book, Shewhart (1931) makes no demand on the distribution of the characteristic to be plotted on a control chart, so how can the idea that normality is, if not required, at least highly desirable be explained?
Abstract: In his seminal book, Shewhart (1931) makes no demand on the distribution of the characteristic to be plotted on a control chart. How then can we explain the idea that normality is, if not required, at least highly desirable? I believe that it has come about through the many statistical studies of control-chart behavior. If one is to study how a control chart behaves, it is necessary to relate it to some distribution. The obvious choice is the normal distribution because of its ubiquity as a satisfactory model. This is bolstered by the existence of the Central Limit Theorem.

896 citations

01 Jan 2013
TL;DR: Four rationales for sharing data are examined, drawing examples from the sciences, social sciences, and humanities: to reproduce or to verify research, to make results of publicly funded research available to the public, to enable others to ask new questions of extant data, and to advance the state of research and innovation.
Abstract: We must all accept that science is data and that data are science, and thus provide for, and justify the need for the support of, much-improved data curation. (Hanson, Sugden, & Alberts) Researchers are producing an unprecedented deluge of data by using new methods and instrumentation. Others may wish to mine these data for new discoveries and innovations. However, research data are not readily available as sharing is common in only a few fields such as astronomy and genomics. Data sharing practices in other fields vary widely. Moreover, research data take many forms, are handled in many ways, using many approaches, and often are difficult to interpret once removed from their initial context. Data sharing is thus a conundrum. Four rationales for sharing data are examined, drawing examples from the sciences, social sciences, and humanities: (1) to reproduce or to verify research, (2) to make results of publicly funded research available to the public, (3) to enable others to ask new questions of extant data, and (4) to advance the state of research and innovation. These rationales differ by the arguments for sharing, by beneficiaries, and by the motivations and incentives of the many stakeholders involved. The challenges are to understand which data might be shared, by whom, with whom, under what conditions, why, and to what effects. Answers will inform data policy and practice. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

634 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: MCpack is introduced, an R package that contains functions to perform Bayesian inference using posterior simulation for a number of statistical models, and some useful utility functions are introduced.
Abstract: We introduce MCMCpack, an R package that contains functions to perform Bayesian inference using posterior simulation for a number of statistical models In addition to code that can be used to fit commonly used models, MCMCpack also contains some useful utility functions, including some additional density functions and pseudo-random number generators for statistical distributions, a general purpose Metropolis sampling algorithm, and tools for visualization

569 citations