scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

S. Samuroff

Bio: S. Samuroff is an academic researcher from Carnegie Mellon University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Dark energy & Galaxy. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 20 publications receiving 478 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
T. M. C. Abbott, Michel Aguena1, A. Alarcon2, S. Allam3, S. W. Allen4, J. Annis3, Santiago Avila5, David Bacon6, Keith Bechtol7, A. Bermeo8, Gary Bernstein9, E. Bertin10, E. Bertin11, Sunayana Bhargava8, Sebastian Bocquet12, Sebastian Bocquet13, D. H. Brooks14, D. J. Brout9, E. Buckley-Geer3, D. L. Burke4, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind15, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander2, R. Cawthon7, Chihway Chang16, Xi Chen17, Ami Choi18, M. Costanzi, Martin Crocce2, L. N. da Costa, Tamara M. Davis19, J. De Vicente, J. DeRose4, Shantanu Desai20, H. T. Diehl3, J. P. Dietrich13, Scott Dodelson21, Peter Doel14, Alex Drlica-Wagner16, Alex Drlica-Wagner3, K. D. Eckert9, Tim Eifler22, Tim Eifler23, Jack Elvin-Poole18, Juan Estrada3, S. Everett24, August E. Evrard17, Arya Farahi17, I. Ferrero25, B. Flaugher3, Pablo Fosalba2, Joshua A. Frieman3, Juan Garcia-Bellido5, M. Gatti, Enrique Gaztanaga2, D. W. Gerdes17, Tommaso Giannantonio26, Paul Giles8, Sebastian Grandis13, D. Gruen4, Robert A. Gruendl15, J. Gschwend, G. Gutierrez3, W. G. Hartley27, W. G. Hartley14, Samuel Hinton19, D. L. Hollowood24, K. Honscheid18, Ben Hoyle13, Ben Hoyle28, Dragan Huterer17, David James29, Matt J. Jarvis9, Tesla E. Jeltema24, M. W. G. Johnson15, M. D. Johnson15, Steve Kent3, Elisabeth Krause22, Richard G. Kron3, Kyler Kuehn30, Kyler Kuehn31, N. Kuropatkin3, Ofer Lahav14, Tenglin Li32, Tenglin Li33, C. Lidman34, Marcos Lima1, Huan Lin3, Niall MacCrann18, M. A. G. Maia, Adam Mantz4, Jennifer L. Marshall35, Paul Martini18, Julian A. Mayers8, Peter Melchior, J. Mena-Fernández, Felipe Menanteau15, Ramon Miquel, Joseph J. Mohr28, Joseph J. Mohr13, Robert C. Nichol6, Brian Nord3, R. L. C. Ogando, Antonella Palmese3, F. Paz-Chinchón15, A. A. Plazas33, J. Prat, Markus Rau21, A. K. Romer8, A. Roodman4, P. Rooney8, Eduardo Rozo22, Eli S. Rykoff4, M. Sako9, S. Samuroff21, Carlos Solans Sanchez9, E. J. Sanchez, A. Saro36, V. Scarpine3, Michael Schubnell17, Daniel Scolnic37, Santiago Serrano2, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, Erin Sheldon38, J. Allyn Smith39, M. Smith40, E. Suchyta41, M. E. C. Swanson15, Gregory Tarle17, Daniel Thomas6, Chun-Hao To4, Michael Troxel37, Douglas L. Tucker3, T. N. Varga28, T. N. Varga13, A. von der Linden42, A. R. Walker, Risa H. Wechsler4, Jochen Weller28, Jochen Weller13, R. D. Wilkinson8, Hao-Yi Wu18, Brian Yanny3, Yanxi Zhang3, Z. Zhang, Joe Zuntz43 
TL;DR: In this paper, a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of redMaPPer clusters selected from the DES Year 1 dataset was performed using the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as were used in the DES combined probes analysis.
Abstract: We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset. Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in surprisingly low values for S-8 = sigma(8)(Omega(m)/0.3)(0.5) = 0.65 0.04, driven by a low matter density parameter, Omega(m) = 0.179(-0.038)(+0.031), with sigma(8) - Omega(m) posteriors in 2.4 sigma tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in 5.6 sigma with the Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant physics. Cross checks with x-ray and microwave data, as well as independent constraints on the observable -mass relation from Sunyaev-Zeldovich selected clusters, suggest that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness threshold (lambda >= 30) significantly reduces the tension with other probes, and points to one or more richness -dependent effects not captured by our model.

169 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
T. M. C. Abbott, A. Alarcon1, S. Allam2, P. Andersen3  +184 moreInstitutions (56)
TL;DR: Combined results from these probes derive constraints on the equation of state, w, of dark energy and its energy density in the Universe, demonstrating the potential power of large multiprobe photometric surveys and paving the way for order of magnitude advances in constraints on properties ofdark energy and cosmology over the next decade.
Abstract: The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically confirmed type Ia supernova light curves, the baryon acoustic oscillation feature, weak gravitational lensing, and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, w, of dark energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark energy, finding w=-0.80_{-0.11}^{+0.09}. The geometry is shown to be consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the baryon density of Ω_{b}=0.069_{-0.012}^{+0.009} that is independent of early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of large multiprobe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the next decade.

107 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Michael Troxel1, Elisabeth Krause2, Elisabeth Krause3, Chihway Chang4, Tim Eifler3, Tim Eifler2, O. Friedrich5, O. Friedrich6, Daniel Gruen7, Daniel Gruen8, Niall MacCrann1, A. Chen9, C. Davis7, J. DeRose7, Scott Dodelson10, M. Gatti11, Ben Hoyle5, Ben Hoyle6, Dragan Huterer9, Matt J. Jarvis12, F. Lacasa13, P. Lemos14, Hiranya V. Peiris15, J. Prat11, S. Samuroff10, C. Sánchez11, C. Sánchez12, Erin Sheldon16, P. Vielzeuf11, Meng Wang17, Joe Zuntz18, Ofer Lahav15, Filipe B. Abdalla19, Filipe B. Abdalla15, S. Allam17, J. Annis17, Santiago Avila20, E. Bertin21, David J. Brooks15, D. L. Burke8, D. L. Burke7, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind22, M. Carrasco Kind23, J. Carretero11, Martin Crocce24, Carlos E. Cunha7, C. B. D'Andrea12, L. N. da Costa, J. De Vicente, H. T. Diehl17, Peter Doel15, August E. Evrard9, B. Flaugher17, Pablo Fosalba24, Joshua A. Frieman17, Joshua A. Frieman4, Juan Garcia-Bellido25, Enrique Gaztanaga24, D. W. Gerdes9, Robert A. Gruendl22, Robert A. Gruendl23, J. Gschwend, G. Gutierrez17, W. G. Hartley26, W. G. Hartley15, D. L. Hollowood27, K. Honscheid1, David J. James28, Donnacha Kirk15, Kyler Kuehn29, N. Kuropatkin17, Tenglin Li4, Tenglin Li17, Marcos Lima30, M. March12, Felipe Menanteau23, Felipe Menanteau22, Ramon Miquel11, Ramon Miquel31, Joseph J. Mohr6, Joseph J. Mohr5, Ricardo L. C. Ogando, A. A. Plazas3, A. Roodman8, A. Roodman7, E. J. Sanchez, V. Scarpine17, Rafe Schindler8, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, M. Smith32, Marcelle Soares-Santos33, Flavia Sobreira34, E. Suchyta35, M. E. C. Swanson23, Daniel Thomas20, Alistair R. Walker, Risa H. Wechsler7, Risa H. Wechsler8 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the impact of an update to the typical approximation for the shape noise term in the analytic covariance matrix for cosmic shear experiments that assumes the absence of survey boundary and mask effects.
Abstract: We explore the impact of an update to the typical approximation for the shape noise term in the analytic covariance matrix for cosmic shear experiments that assumes the absence of survey boundary and mask effects. We present an exact expression for the number of galaxy pairs in this term based on the survey mask, which leads to more than a factor of three increase in the shape noise on the largest measured scales for the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-450) real-space cosmic shear data. We compare the result of this analytic expression to several alternative methods for measuring the shape noise from the data and find excellent agreement. This update to the covariance resolves any internal model tension evidenced by the previously large cosmological best-fitting chi(2) for the KiDS-450 cosmic shear data. The best-fitting chi(2) is reduced from 161 to 121 for 118 degrees of freedom. We also apply a correction to how the multiplicative shear calibration uncertainty is included in the covariance. This change shifts the inferred amplitude of the correlation function to higher values. We find that this improves agreement of the KiDS-450 cosmic shear results with Dark Energy Survey Year 1 and Planck results.

91 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a joint analysis of intrinsic alignments and cosmology using tomographic weak lensing, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from Year 1 (Y1) of the Dark Energy Survey is performed.
Abstract: We perform a joint analysis of intrinsic alignments and cosmology using tomographic weak lensing, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from Year 1 (Y1) of the Dark Energy Survey. We define early- and late-type subsamples, which are found to pass a series of systematics tests, including for spurious photometric redshift error and point spread function correlations. We analyse these split data alongside the fiducial mixed Y1 sample using a range of intrinsic alignment models. In a fiducial Nonlinear Alignment Model (NLA) analysis, assuming a flat \lcdm~cosmology, we find a significant difference in intrinsic alignment amplitude, with early-type galaxies favouring $A_\mathrm{IA} = 2.38^{+0.32}_{-0.31}$ and late-type galaxies consistent with no intrinsic alignments at $0.05^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$. We find weak evidence of a diminishing alignment amplitude at higher redshifts in the early-type sample. The analysis is repeated using a number of extended model spaces, including a physically motivated model that includes both tidal torquing and tidal alignment mechanisms. In multiprobe likelihood chains in which cosmology, intrinsic alignments in both galaxy samples and all other relevant systematics are varied simultaneously, we find the tidal alignment and tidal torquing parts of the intrinsic alignment signal have amplitudes $A_1 = 2.66 ^{+0.67}_{-0.66}$, $A_2=-2.94^{+1.94}_{-1.83}$, respectively, for early-type galaxies and $A_1 = 0.62 ^{+0.41}_{-0.41}$, $A_2 = -2.26^{+1.30}_{-1.16}$ for late-type galaxies. In the full (mixed) Y1 sample the best constraints are $A_1 = 0.70 ^{+0.41}_{-0.38}$, $A_2 = -1.36 ^{+1.08}_{-1.41}$. For all galaxy splits and IA models considered, we report cosmological parameter constraints that are consistent with the results of Troxel et al. (2017) and Dark Energy Survey Collaboration (2017).

72 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
M. Gatti1, Erin Sheldon2, Alexandra Amon3, Matthew R. Becker4, Michael Troxel5, Ami Choi6, C. Doux7, Niall MacCrann6, A. Navarro-Alsina8, Ian Harrison9, Daniel Gruen3, Daniel Gruen10, Gary Bernstein7, Matt J. Jarvis7, L. F. Secco7, Agnès Ferté11, T. Shin7, J. McCullough3, R. P. Rollins9, R. Chen5, Chihway Chang12, S. Pandey7, I. Tutusaus13, J. Prat12, Jack Elvin-Poole6, Carlos Solans Sanchez7, A. A. Plazas14, A. Roodman3, A. Roodman10, Joe Zuntz15, T. M. C. Abbott, Michel Aguena16, S. Allam17, J. Annis17, Santiago Avila18, David Bacon19, E. Bertin20, Sunayana Bhargava21, David J. Brooks22, D. L. Burke3, A. Carnero Rosell13, A. Carnero Rosell23, M. Carrasco Kind24, M. Carrasco Kind25, J. Carretero1, F. J. Castander13, Christopher J. Conselice26, Christopher J. Conselice9, M. Costanzi27, Martin Crocce13, L. N. da Costa, Tamara M. Davis28, J. De Vicente, S. Desai29, H. T. Diehl17, J. P. Dietrich30, Peter Doel22, Alex Drlica-Wagner17, Alex Drlica-Wagner12, K. D. Eckert7, S. Everett31, I. Ferrero32, Josh Frieman17, Josh Frieman12, Juan Garcia-Bellido18, D. W. Gerdes33, Tommaso Giannantonio34, Robert A. Gruendl24, Robert A. Gruendl25, J. Gschwend, G. Gutierrez17, W. G. Hartley22, W. G. Hartley35, Samuel Hinton28, D. L. Hollowood6, D. L. Hollowood31, K. Honscheid6, Ben Hoyle36, Ben Hoyle30, E. M. Huff11, Dragan Huterer33, Bhuvnesh Jain7, David J. James37, Tesla E. Jeltema31, Elisabeth Krause38, Richard G. Kron12, Richard G. Kron17, N. Kuropatkin17, Marcos Lima16, M. A. G. Maia, Jennifer L. Marshall39, Ramon Miquel1, Ramon Miquel40, Robert Morgan41, J. Myles3, Antonella Palmese12, Antonella Palmese17, F. Paz-Chinchón24, F. Paz-Chinchón34, Eli S. Rykoff3, Eli S. Rykoff10, S. Samuroff42, E. J. Sanchez, V. Scarpine17, Michael Schubnell33, S. Serrano13, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, M. Smith43, M. Soares-Santos33, E. Suchyta44, M. E. C. Swanson24, G. Tarle33, Daniel Thomas19, Chun-Hao To3, Chun-Hao To10, Douglas L. Tucker17, T. N. Varga30, T. N. Varga36, Risa H. Wechsler3, Risa H. Wechsler10, Jochen Weller30, Jochen Weller36, W. C. Wester17, R. D. Wilkinson21 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present and characterize the galaxy shape catalogue from the first 3 years of the DES observations, over an effective area of 4143 deg2 of the southern sky.
Abstract: We present and characterize the galaxy shape catalogue from the first 3 yr of Dark Energy Survey (DES) observations, over an effective area of 4143 deg2 of the southern sky. We describe our data analysis process and our self-calibrating shear measurement pipeline metacalibration, which builds and improves upon the pipeline used in the DES Year 1 analysis in several aspects. The DES Year 3 weak-lensing shape catalogue consists of 100 204 026 galaxies, measured in the riz bands, resulting in a weighted source number density of neff = 5.59 gal arcmin-2 and corresponding shape noise σe = 0.261. We perform a battery of internal null tests on the catalogue, including tests on systematics related to the point spread function (PSF) modelling, spurious catalogue B-mode signals, catalogue contamination, and galaxy properties.

58 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Nabila Aghanim1, Yashar Akrami2, Yashar Akrami3, Yashar Akrami4  +229 moreInstitutions (70)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present cosmological parameter results from the full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, combining information from the temperature and polarization maps and the lensing reconstruction.
Abstract: We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, combining information from the temperature and polarization maps and the lensing reconstruction Compared to the 2015 results, improved measurements of large-scale polarization allow the reionization optical depth to be measured with higher precision, leading to significant gains in the precision of other correlated parameters Improved modelling of the small-scale polarization leads to more robust constraints on manyparameters,withresidualmodellinguncertaintiesestimatedtoaffectthemonlyatthe05σlevelWefindgoodconsistencywiththestandard spatially-flat6-parameter ΛCDMcosmologyhavingapower-lawspectrumofadiabaticscalarperturbations(denoted“base ΛCDM”inthispaper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in combination A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ωch2 = 0120±0001, baryon density Ωbh2 = 00224±00001, scalar spectral index ns = 0965±0004, and optical depth τ = 0054±0007 (in this abstract we quote 68% confidence regions on measured parameters and 95% on upper limits) The angular acoustic scale is measured to 003% precision, with 100θ∗ = 10411±00003Theseresultsareonlyweaklydependentonthecosmologicalmodelandremainstable,withsomewhatincreasederrors, in many commonly considered extensions Assuming the base-ΛCDM cosmology, the inferred (model-dependent) late-Universe parameters are: HubbleconstantH0 = (674±05)kms−1Mpc−1;matterdensityparameterΩm = 0315±0007;andmatterfluctuationamplitudeσ8 = 0811±0006 We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the base-ΛCDM model Combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements (and consideringsingle-parameterextensions)weconstraintheeffectiveextrarelativisticdegreesoffreedomtobe Neff = 299±017,inagreementwith the Standard Model prediction Neff = 3046, and find that the neutrino mass is tightly constrained toPmν < 012 eV The CMB spectra continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudesthan predicted in base ΛCDM at over 2σ, which pulls some parameters that affect thelensing amplitude away from the ΛCDM model; however, this is not supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the background geometry) BAOdataThejointconstraintwithBAOmeasurementsonspatialcurvatureisconsistentwithaflatuniverse, ΩK = 0001±0002Alsocombining with Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the dark-energy equation of state parameter is measured to be w0 = −103±003, consistent with a cosmological constant We find no evidence for deviations from a purely power-law primordial spectrum, and combining with data from BAO, BICEP2, and Keck Array data, we place a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r0002 < 006 Standard big-bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the helium and deuterium abundances for the base-ΛCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations The Planck base-ΛCDM results are in good agreement with BAO, SNe, and some galaxy lensing observations, but in slight tension with the Dark Energy Survey’s combined-probe results including galaxy clustering (which prefers lower fluctuation amplitudes or matter density parameters), and in significant, 36σ, tension with local measurements of the Hubble constant (which prefer a higher value) Simple model extensions that can partially resolve these tensions are not favoured by the Planck data

4,688 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Nabila Aghanim1, Yashar Akrami2, Yashar Akrami3, Yashar Akrami4  +229 moreInstitutions (70)
TL;DR: In this paper, the cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the CMB anisotropies were presented, with good consistency with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter CDM cosmology having a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations from polarization, temperature, and lensing separately and in combination.
Abstract: We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the CMB anisotropies. We find good consistency with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter $\Lambda$CDM cosmology having a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted "base $\Lambda$CDM" in this paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density $\Omega_c h^2 = 0.120\pm 0.001$, baryon density $\Omega_b h^2 = 0.0224\pm 0.0001$, scalar spectral index $n_s = 0.965\pm 0.004$, and optical depth $\tau = 0.054\pm 0.007$ (in this abstract we quote $68\,\%$ confidence regions on measured parameters and $95\,\%$ on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is measured to $0.03\,\%$ precision, with $100\theta_*=1.0411\pm 0.0003$. These results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable, with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions. Assuming the base-$\Lambda$CDM cosmology, the inferred late-Universe parameters are: Hubble constant $H_0 = (67.4\pm 0.5)$km/s/Mpc; matter density parameter $\Omega_m = 0.315\pm 0.007$; and matter fluctuation amplitude $\sigma_8 = 0.811\pm 0.006$. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the base-$\Lambda$CDM model. Combining with BAO we constrain the effective extra relativistic degrees of freedom to be $N_{\rm eff} = 2.99\pm 0.17$, and the neutrino mass is tightly constrained to $\sum m_ u< 0.12$eV. The CMB spectra continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base -$\Lambda$CDM at over $2\,\sigma$, which pulls some parameters that affect the lensing amplitude away from the base-$\Lambda$CDM model; however, this is not supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the background geometry) BAO data. (Abridged)

3,077 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, which was dedicated to studying the early Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched on 14 May 2009 and scanned the microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12 August 2009 and 23 October 2013, producing deep, high-resolution, all-sky maps in nine frequency bands from 30 to 857GHz as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, which was dedicated to studying the early Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched on 14 May 2009. It scanned the microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12 August 2009 and 23 October 2013, producing deep, high-resolution, all-sky maps in nine frequency bands from 30 to 857GHz. This paper presents the cosmological legacy of Planck, which currently provides our strongest constraints on the parameters of the standard cosmological model and some of the tightest limits available on deviations from that model. The 6-parameter LCDM model continues to provide an excellent fit to the cosmic microwave background data at high and low redshift, describing the cosmological information in over a billion map pixels with just six parameters. With 18 peaks in the temperature and polarization angular power spectra constrained well, Planck measures five of the six parameters to better than 1% (simultaneously), with the best-determined parameter (theta_*) now known to 0.03%. We describe the multi-component sky as seen by Planck, the success of the LCDM model, and the connection to lower-redshift probes of structure formation. We also give a comprehensive summary of the major changes introduced in this 2018 release. The Planck data, alone and in combination with other probes, provide stringent constraints on our models of the early Universe and the large-scale structure within which all astrophysical objects form and evolve. We discuss some lessons learned from the Planck mission, and highlight areas ripe for further experimental advances.

997 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Nabila Aghanim1, Yashar Akrami2, Yashar Akrami3, Frederico Arroja4  +251 moreInstitutions (72)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the cosmological legacy of the Planck satellite, which provides the strongest constraints on the parameters of the standard cosmology model and some of the tightest limits available on deviations from that model.
Abstract: The European Space Agency’s Planck satellite, which was dedicated to studying the early Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched on 14 May 2009. It scanned the microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12 August 2009 and 23 October 2013, producing deep, high-resolution, all-sky maps in nine frequency bands from 30 to 857 GHz. This paper presents the cosmological legacy of Planck, which currently provides our strongest constraints on the parameters of the standard cosmological model and some of the tightest limits available on deviations from that model. The 6-parameter ΛCDM model continues to provide an excellent fit to the cosmic microwave background data at high and low redshift, describing the cosmological information in over a billion map pixels with just six parameters. With 18 peaks in the temperature and polarization angular power spectra constrained well, Planck measures five of the six parameters to better than 1% (simultaneously), with the best-determined parameter (θ*) now known to 0.03%. We describe the multi-component sky as seen by Planck, the success of the ΛCDM model, and the connection to lower-redshift probes of structure formation. We also give a comprehensive summary of the major changes introduced in this 2018 release. The Planck data, alone and in combination with other probes, provide stringent constraints on our models of the early Universe and the large-scale structure within which all astrophysical objects form and evolve. We discuss some lessons learned from the Planck mission, and highlight areas ripe for further experimental advances.

879 citations