Author
Samuel Dagogo-Jack
Other affiliations: University of Pennsylvania, Washington University in St. Louis, University of Tennessee
Bio: Samuel Dagogo-Jack is an academic researcher from University of Tennessee Health Science Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Diabetes mellitus & Type 2 diabetes. The author has an hindex of 50, co-authored 211 publications receiving 13265 citations. Previous affiliations of Samuel Dagogo-Jack include University of Pennsylvania & Washington University in St. Louis.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: The evidence about the impact of hypoglycemia on patients with diabetes that has become available since the past reviews by the American Diabetes Association and The Endocrine Society is reviewed to provide guidance about how this new information should be incorporated into clinical practice.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE To review the evidence about the impact of hypoglycemia on patients with diabetes that has become available since the past reviews of this subject by the American Diabetes Association and The Endocrine Society and to provide guidance about how this new information should be incorporated into clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS Five members of the American Diabetes Association and five members of The Endocrine Society with expertise in different aspects of hypoglycemia were invited by the Chair, who is a member of both, to participate in a planning conference call and a 2-day meeting that was also attended by staff from both organizations. Subsequent communications took place via e-mail and phone calls. The writing group consisted of those invitees who participated in the writing of the manuscript. The workgroup meeting was supported by educational grants to the American Diabetes Association from Lilly USA, LLC and Novo Nordisk and sponsorship to the American Diabetes Association from Sanofi. The sponsors had no input into the development of or content of the report. EVIDENCE The writing group considered data from recent clinical trials and other studies to update the prior workgroup report. Unpublished data were not used. Expert opinion was used to develop some conclusions. CONSENSUS PROCESS Consensus was achieved by group discussion during conference calls and face-to-face meetings, as well as by iterative revisions of the written document. The document was reviewed and approved by the American Diabetes Association’s Professional Practice Committee in October 2012 and approved by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors in November 2012 and was reviewed and approved by The Endocrine Society’s Clinical Affairs Core Committee in October 2012 and by Council in November 2012. CONCLUSIONS The workgroup reconfirmed the previous definitions of hypoglycemia in diabetes, reviewed the implications of hypoglycemia on both short- and long-term outcomes, considered the implications of hypoglycemia on treatment outcomes, presented strategies to prevent hypoglycemia, and identified knowledge gaps that should be addressed by future research. In addition, tools for patients to report hypoglycemia at each visit and for clinicians to document counseling are provided.
1,180 citations
Baylor College of Medicine1, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center2, Emory University3, Ochsner Medical Center4, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai5, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center6, University of Tennessee Health Science Center7, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio8, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists9, Tulane University10, University of Alabama at Birmingham11, Wayne State University12, The American College of Financial Services13, University of California, San Diego14, University of Washington15, University of Miami16, Washington University in St. Louis17, University of California, Irvine18
TL;DR: This chapter discusses the development and use of eicosapentaenoic acid as a treatment for diabetic ketoacidosis and its applications in conventional and regenerative medicine.
680 citations
TL;DR: These guidelines are thorough and practical, and they offer reasoned and balanced recommendations based on the best available evidence to clinical endocrinologists, endocrine surgeons, pediatricians, and internists whose practices include management of patients with thyroid disorders.
650 citations
The American College of Financial Services1, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai2, Wayne State University3, Emory University4, Cleveland Clinic5, University of California, San Diego6, Ochsner Medical Center7, Louisiana State University8, University of Tennessee Health Science Center9, University of Texas at Dallas10, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists11, Harvard University12, Baylor College of Medicine13, University of Alabama at Birmingham14, Veterans Health Administration15, University of Washington16, Mayo Clinic17, University of Miami18, University of California, Santa Barbara19, SUNY Downstate Medical Center20, University of Arizona21, Washington University in St. Louis22, University of Southern California23, University of California, Los Angeles24, University of California, Irvine25, Eastern Virginia Medical School26, Cornell University27
TL;DR: These guidelines are a working document that reflects the state of the field at the time of publication and any decision by practitioners to apply these guidelines must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances.
634 citations
Cited by
More filters
01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care.
Abstract: XI. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING DIABETES CARE D iabetes is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and patient self-management education to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care. While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided. These standards are not intended to preclude more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed. For more detailed information, refer to Bode (Ed.): Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes (1), Burant (Ed): Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes (2), and Klingensmith (Ed): Intensive Diabetes Management (3). The recommendations included are diagnostic and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and modeled after existing methods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations. The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E.
9,618 citations
TL;DR: The data support the argument that magnesium supplementation improves the metabolic status in hypomagnesemic CKD patients with pre-diabetes and obesity.
Abstract: Background/Aims: Magnesium is an essential mineral for many metabolic functions. There is very little information on the effect of magnesium supplementation on me
4,639 citations
3,645 citations
TL;DR: In patients with type 2 diabetes who were at high cardiovascular risk, the rate of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, orNonfatal stroke was significantly lower among patients receiving semaglutide than among those receiving placebo, an outcome that confirmed the noninferiority of semag lutide.
Abstract: BackgroundRegulatory guidance specifies the need to establish cardiovascular safety of new diabetes therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes in order to rule out excess cardiovascular risk. The cardiovascular effects of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue with an extended half-life of approximately 1 week, in type 2 diabetes are unknown. MethodsWe randomly assigned 3297 patients with type 2 diabetes who were on a standard-care regimen to receive once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 mg or 1.0 mg) or placebo for 104 weeks. The primary composite outcome was the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. We hypothesized that semaglutide would be noninferior to placebo for the primary outcome. The noninferiority margin was 1.8 for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio. ResultsAt baseline, 2735 of the patients (83.0%) had established cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or both. The primary outcome occurred in 10...
3,551 citations
TL;DR: The cardiovascular safety profile of dapagliflozin, a selective inhibitor of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 that promotes glucosuria in patients with type 2 diabetes, is undefined.
Abstract: Background The cardiovascular safety profile of dapagliflozin, a selective inhibitor of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 that promotes glucosuria in patients with type 2 diabetes, is undefined. Methods We randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes who had or were at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to receive either dapagliflozin or placebo. The primary safety outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. The primary efficacy outcomes were MACE and a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary efficacy outcomes were a renal composite (≥40% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate to <60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area, new end-stage renal disease, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes) and death from any cause. Results We evaluated 17,160 patients, including 10,186 without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, ...
3,430 citations