scispace - formally typeset
S

Sandro Ambuehl

Researcher at University of Zurich

Publications -  25
Citations -  309

Sandro Ambuehl is an academic researcher from University of Zurich. The author has contributed to research in topics: Incentive & Competence (human resources). The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 21 publications receiving 250 citations. Previous affiliations of Sandro Ambuehl include University of Toronto & Stanford University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Belief updating and the demand for information

TL;DR: This paper found that individuals underreact to increasing the informativeness of a signal, thus undervalue high-quality information, and that they disproportionately prefer information that may yield certainty, mainly due to non-standard belief updating.
Journal ArticleDOI

More Money, More Problems? Can High Pay Be Coercive and Repugnant?

TL;DR: In this paper, a vignette study on MTurk concerning participation in medical trials showed that a substantial minority of subjects concurred with the IRB's decision to disallow high incentives they deem coercive.
Posted Content

The Effect of Financial Education on the Quality of Decision Making

TL;DR: The authors introduced a method for measuring the quality of financial decision making built around a notion of financial competence, which gauges the alignment between individuals' choices and those they would make if they properly understood their opportunities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Financial education, financial competence, and consumer welfare

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce the concept of financial competence, a measure of the extent to which individuals' financial choices align with those they would make if they properly understood their opportunity sets.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Ethics of Incentivizing the Uninformed: A Vignette Study

TL;DR: Ambuehl et al. as mentioned in this paper showed that people with higher costs of information processing respond more to an increase in the incentive for a complex transaction, and decide to participate based on a worse understanding of its consequences.