scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Sang-Ho Kim

Other affiliations: Dong-A University Hospital
Bio: Sang-Ho Kim is an academic researcher from Dong-a University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Epilepsy & 100-year flood. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 13 publications receiving 90 citations. Previous affiliations of Sang-Ho Kim include Dong-A University Hospital.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that SRH is a frequent accompanying symptom of epileptic seizures causing major impairment in daily life, and migraine is an important comorbidity of epilepsy, affecting the incidence and characteristics of SRH.
Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency and characteristics of migraine and seizure-related headache (SRH) according to the criteria of the International Headache Society. Materials and Methods A questionnaire was undertaken at the initial evaluation of newly referred patients from 32 epilepsy clinics. Results Of a total of 597 patients, 74 (12.4%) patients had migraine. Age at the onset of epilepsy was lower in patients with migraine than in those without. Twenty-six (4.4%), nine (1.5%), and 146 (24.5%) patients experienced prodromal, ictal, and postictal SRH, respectively (n = 169, 28.3%). A pain intensity of prodromal and postictal SRH was 6.1 ± 1.5 (SD) and 6.3 ± 1.9 (SD) on the visual analogue scale, and their duration was 12.6 ± 26.7 (SD) hours and 9.0 ± 17.4 (SD) hours, respectively. Age at the onset of epilepsy was lower in patients with SRH than in those without, and the risk of occurrence of SRH was significantly greater in patients with longer epilepsy duration. SRH could be classified as a type of migraine in 46.2% of patients with prodromal SRH and in 36.3% of patients with postictal SRH. Prodromal SRH occurred more frequently and was more likely to be a migraine-type in patients with migraine compared with those without. Postictal SRH occurred more frequently and was more likely to be a migraine-type in patients with migraine. Conclusion This study suggests that SRH is a frequent accompanying symptom of epileptic seizures causing major impairment in daily life, and migraine is an important comorbidity of epilepsy, affecting the incidence and characteristics of SRH.

44 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The study suggested that LTG + VPA can be an option as initial drug regimen for untreated patients with partial seizures and/or GTCS except for women of reproductive age.
Abstract: Purpose To compare controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy (CBZ-CR) with lamotrigine and valproate combination therapy (LTG + VPA) in equivalent total drug load, as initial drug regimen in untreated patients with partial and/or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). Methods This unblinded, randomized, 60-week superiority trial recruited patients having two or more unprovoked seizures with at least one seizure during previous three months. After randomization into CBZ-CR or LTG + VPA, patients entered into eight-week titration phase (TP), followed by 52-week maintenance phase (MP). Median doses of CBZ-CR and LTG + VPA were 600 mg/day and 75 mg/day + 500 mg/day, respectively. Primary outcome measure was completion rate (CR), a proportion of patients who have completed the 60-week study as planned. Secondary efficacy measures included seizure-free rate (SFR) for 52-week of MP and time to first seizure (TTFS) during MP. Results Among 207 randomized patients, 202 underwent outcome analysis (104 in CBZ-CR, 98 in LTG + VPA). CR was 62.5% in CBZ-CR and 65.3% in LTG + VPA (p = 0.678). SFR during MP was higher in LTG + VPA (64.1%) than CBZ-CR (47.8%) (P = 0.034). TTFS was shorter with CBZ-CR (p = 0.041). Incidence of adverse effects (AEs) were 57.7% in CBZ-CR and 60.2% in LTG + VPA and premature drug withdrawal rates due to AEs were 12.5% and 7.1%, respectively, which were not significantly different. Conclusion CR was comparable between LTG + VPA and CBZ-CR, however, both SFR for 52-week MP and TTFS during MP were in favor of LTG + VPA than CBZ-CR. The study suggested that LTG + VPA can be an option as initial drug regimen for untreated patients with partial seizures and/or GTCS except for women of reproductive age.

16 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that adjunctive ZNS therapy for the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy, though efficacious, is associated with significant tolerability problems.
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive zonisamide (ZNS) therapy in Korean adults with uncontrolled partial epilepsy. Methods Study patients had an average of at least one seizure per 4-week (averaged over a 12-week historical baseline) despite the use of one to three antiepileptic drugs. The starting dose of ZNS was 100mg/day, and was increased to 200mg/day after 2weeks. During the 12-week maintenance period, the dose of ZNS was adjusted to 200–400mg/day based on the physicians' discretion. The global evaluation scale (GES) and quality of life (QOLIE-31) were also evaluated. Results A total of 121 patients were enrolled, of which 88 patients completed the study. The median percent reduction in weekly seizure frequency over the treatment period was 59.0%. The ≥50% and ≥75% responder rates were 57.3% and 38.5%, respectively. Seizure freedom over the treatment period was observed in 25 patients, but seizure freedom throughout the 16-week treatment period was attained in only 16 patients. On investigator's GES, 84 patients were considered improved, with 33 patients showing marked improvement. In QOLIE-31 scale, seizure worry improved significantly but emotional well-being deteriorated. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported in 80 patients. The most common AEs were dizziness (28.1%), somnolence (24.0%), anorexia (18.2%), headache (14.0%), nausea (13.2%), and weight loss (10.7%). Twenty-two patients discontinued the trial due to drug-related AEs. Conclusions Our results suggest that adjunctive ZNS therapy for the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy, though efficacious, is associated with significant tolerability problems.

9 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Overall retention on the first AED was not significantly different from that in newly diagnosed cryptogenic partial epilepsy, and in clinical practice, epileptiform discharges on the initial EEG could predict the failure of retention on a first antiepileptic drug for 2 years.
Abstract: Objectives Approximately two-thirds of the patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy remained on their first antiepileptic drug (AED) for 2 years in clinical practice. We aimed to analyze retention on the first AED for 2 years in newly diagnosed cryptogenic partial epilepsy patients in clinical practice and whether the presence of epileptiform discharges on the initial EEG was a predictor of the failure of retention on the first AED. Methods For the purpose of this study, we retrospectively reviewed epilepsy database. On the Epilepsy Database, we found 495 newly diagnosed epilepsy patients who had been followed up for at least 2 years. Of these 495 newly diagnosed epilepsy patients, 172 patients had cryptogenic partial epilepsy. The outcome of this study was the retention rate for the first AED for 2 years. In addition, we analyzed the retention on first AED according to the presence or absence of epileptiform discharges on the initial EEG using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results Overall, retention rate on the first AED for 2 years was 51%. The main lesion of retention failure was a lack of tolerance. The presence of epileptiform discharges on the initial EEGs was significantly related to the failure of retention on the first AED ( p =0.003). Conclusions In newly diagnosed cryptogenic partial epilepsy, overall retention on the first AED was not significantly different from that in newly diagnosed partial epilepsy. In clinical practice, epileptiform discharges on the initial EEG could predict the failure of retention on the first AED for 2 years.

7 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although second-generation antiseizure medications have not substantially reduced the proportion of patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy, their availability has enabled more opportunities to tailor treatment choice to the characteristics of the individual, highlighting the need for novel strategies in epilepsy drug development.
Abstract: Since 1989, 18 second-generation antiseizure medications have reached the market, resulting in a greatly increased range of treatment options for patients and prescribers. 30 years have passed and now is the time for an appraisal of the effect of these medications on clinical outcomes. Every antiseizure medication needs to be assessed individually, but overall second-generation drugs are less likely to cause pharmacokinetic interactions than their older counterparts. Some second-generation antiseizure medications have shown advantages in tolerability and safety, particularly in the treatment of older patients and women of childbearing potential. Disappointingly, however, none of these medications appear to be more efficacious than first-generation antiseizure medications, highlighting the need for novel strategies in epilepsy drug development. Although second-generation antiseizure medications have not substantially reduced the proportion of patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy, their availability has enabled more opportunities to tailor treatment choice to the characteristics of the individual.

106 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An extensive review of the literature is performed and definitions and a terminology which may become the basis of a forthcoming classification of headaches associated with epileptic seizures are suggested.
Abstract: Purpose There are different possible temporal associations between epileptic seizures and headache attacks which have given rise to unclear or controversial terminologies. The classification of the International League Against Epilepsy does not refer to this type of disorder, while the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-2) defines three kinds of association: 1. migraine-triggered seizure ("migralepsy"), 2. hemicrania epileptica, and 3. post-ictal headache. Methods We performed an extensive review of the literature, not including "post-ictal" and "inter-ictal" headaches. Results On the basis of well-documented reports, the following clinical entities may be identified: (A) "epileptic headache (EH)" or "ictal epileptic headache (IEH)": in this condition headache (with or without migrainous features) is an epileptic manifestation per se , with onset, and cessation if isolated, coinciding with the scalp or deep EEG pattern of an epileptic seizure. EH maybe followed by other epileptic manifestations (motor/sensory/autonomic); this condition should be differentiated from "pure" or "isolated" EH, in which headache/migraine is the sole epileptic manifestation (requiring differential diagnosis from other headache forms). "Hemicrania epileptica" (if confirmed) is a very rare variant of EH, characterized by ipsilateral location of headache and ictal EEG paroxysms. (B) "Pre-ictal migraine" and "pre-ictal headache": when a headache attack is followed during, or shortly after, by a typical epileptic seizure. The migraine attack may be with or without aura, and its seizure-triggering role ("migraine-triggered seizure") is still a subject of debate. A differentiation from occipital epilepsy is mandatory. The term "migralepsy" has not been used uniformly, and may therefore led to misinterpretation. Conclusions On the basis of this review we suggest definitions and a terminology which may become the basis of a forthcoming classification of headaches associated with epileptic seizures.

60 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 Oct 2012-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: Factors in pre- and perinatal period were found to be most crucial for epilepsy risk in Cambodia which inturn provides major prevention opportunities and a global action plan for treatment, stigma reduction and improvement of QOL should be set-up.
Abstract: Purpose Identify epilepsy-associated factors and calculate measures of impact, stigma, quality of life (QOL), knowledge-attitude-practice (KAP) and treatment gap in Prey Veng, Cambodia. Methods This first Cambodian population-based case-control study had 96 epileptologist-confirmed epilepsy cases and 192 randomly selected matched healthy controls. Standard questionnaires, which have been used in similar settings, were used for collecting data on various parameters. Univariate and multivariate regression was done to determine odds ratios. Jacoby stigma, 31-item QOL, KAP etc were determined and so were the factors associated with them using STATA software. Treatment gap was measured using direct method. Key findings Multivariate analyses yielded family history of epilepsy, difficult or long delivery, other problems beside seizures (mainly mental retardation, hyperthermia), and eventful pregnancy of the subject's mother as factors associated with epilepsy. There was high frequency of seizure precipitants esp. those related to sleep. Population attributable risk (%) was: family history (15.0), eventful pregnancy of subject's mother (14.5), long/difficult birth (6.5), and other problem beside seizures (20.0). Mean stigma (1.9±1.1, on a scale of 3) was mainly related to treatment efficacy. Mean QOL (5.0±1.4 on a scale of 10) was mainly related to treatment regularity. Cause or risk factor could be determined in 56% of cases. Treatment gap was 65.8%. Significance Factors in pre- and perinatal period were found to be most crucial for epilepsy risk in Cambodia which inturn provides major prevention opportunities. A global action plan for treatment, stigma reduction and improvement of QOL should be set-up in this country.

58 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Migraine was the most represented type of headache in patients with epilepsy, while patients with any inter-IH (migraine or TTH) are predisposed to manifest a post- IH after seizures.
Abstract: Headache and epilepsy are two relatively common neurological disorders and their relationship is still a matter of debate. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence and clinical features of inter-ictal (inter-IH) and peri-ictal headache (peri-IH) in patients with epilepsy. All patients aged ≥ 17 years referring to our tertiary Epilepsy Centre were consecutively recruited from March to May 2011 and from March to July 2012. They underwent a semi-structured interview including the International Classification Headache Disorders (ICHD-II) criteria to diagnose the lifetime occurrence of headache.χ2-test, t-test and Mann–Whitney test were used to compare clinical variables in patients with and without inter-IH and peri-IH. Out of 388 enrolled patients 48.5 % had inter-IH: migraine in 26.3 %, tension-type headache (TTH) in 19.1 %, other primary headaches in 3.1 %. Peri-IH was observed in 23.7 %: pre-ictally in 6.7 %, ictally in 0.8 % and post-ictally in 19.1 %. Comparing patients with inter-ictal migraine (102), inter-ictal TTH (74) and without inter-IH (200), we found that pre-ictal headache (pre-IH) was significantly represented only in migraineurs (OR 3.54, 95 % CI 1.88-6.66, P < 0.001). Post-ictal headache (post-IH) was significantly associated with both migraineurs (OR 2.60, 95 % CI 1.85-3.64, P < 0.001) and TTH patients (OR 2.05, 95 % CI 1.41-2.98, P < 0.001). Moreover, post-IH was significantly associated with antiepileptic polytherapy (P < 0.001), high seizure frequency (P = 0.002) and tonic-clonic seizures (P = 0.043). Migraine was the most represented type of headache in patients with epilepsy. Migraineurs are more prone to develop pre-IH, while patients with any inter-IH (migraine or TTH) are predisposed to manifest a post-IH after seizures.

46 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Most experts now agree to the concept of “rational polyther therapy” consisting of mechanistic combinations of AEDs exerting synergistic interactions and to the importance of continuing trials of different rational polytherapy regimens to improve the outcome of the core population of epilepsy patients in the long term.
Abstract: Antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy starts with an accurate diagnosis of epilepsy and is followed by sequential drug trials. Seizure freedom is largely achieved by the first two drug trials; thus, epilepsy that cannot be controlled after appropriately conducted trials of the first two drugs is defined as drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). It is still unclear which mode of pharmacotherapy, among monotherapy and polytherapy, shows better outcomes in cases of DRE. However, in a recent large hospital cohort study over past two decades, combination therapy was associated with a progressive increase in seizure-free rate than monotherapy in DRE. The benefits of polytherapy in the management of DRE might be related to the recent introduction of many new AEDs with different and novel mechanisms of action and better pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles. These new AEDs were introduced to the market after they have proven their superiority over placebos in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on add-on therapy in patients with DRE. Therefore, polytherapy including these new AEDs in the regimen is the approved mode of treatment for cases of DRE; this has prompted physicians to try various combinations of polytherapy to optimize the clinical outcomes. In addition, the significant discrepancies in AED responder rates between RCTs and real-world practice may support the importance of judicious use of new drugs in polytherapy by experienced epileptologists. Most experts now agree to the concept of "rational polytherapy" consisting of mechanistic combinations of AEDs exerting synergistic interactions and to the importance of continuing trials of different rational polytherapy regimens to improve the outcome of the core population of epilepsy patients in the long term.

46 citations