scispace - formally typeset
S

Santonu Sarkar

Researcher at Birla Institute of Technology and Science

Publications -  134
Citations -  2237

Santonu Sarkar is an academic researcher from Birla Institute of Technology and Science. The author has contributed to research in topics: Software as a service & Software system. The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 125 publications receiving 2048 citations. Previous affiliations of Santonu Sarkar include Jadavpur University & Accenture.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

The social network of software engineering research

TL;DR: This paper examines the collaboration networks based on co-authorship information of papers from ten software engineering publication venues over the 1976-2010 time period and investigates whether software engineering collaboration networks manifest symptoms of the small-world phenomenon, conform to the criteria of "social networks", and manifest increasing collaboration with time.
Journal ArticleDOI

DOORS: an object-oriented CAD system for high level synthesis

TL;DR: An automated design and synthesis environment called DOORS has been proposed that can accept a complex system specification at such a high level of abstraction and synthesises the circuit.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Predicting the Impact of Software Engineering Topics: An Empirical Study

TL;DR: It is argued that research topics, rather than individual publications, have wider relevance in the research ecosystem, for individuals as well as organizations.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

CPU Frequency Tuning to Improve Energy Efficiency of MapReduce Systems

TL;DR: This paper characterize the energy efficiency of MapReduce jobs with respect to built-in power governors, and indicates that while a built- in power governor provides the best energy efficiency for a job that is CPU as well as IO intensive, a common CPU-frequency across the cluster provides best the energy Efficiency.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

An Empirical Evaluation of Design Abstraction and Performance of Thrust Framework

TL;DR: This paper has compared the performance of three Thrust applications with their corresponding native versions in CUDA, OpenMP, Xeon-Phi and the CPP backends and shown quantitatively that while it is easier to write an application using Thrust, the framework does not provide any abstraction over the memory hierarchy of the underlying backend to the programmer.