S
Santonu Sarkar
Researcher at Birla Institute of Technology and Science
Publications - 134
Citations - 2237
Santonu Sarkar is an academic researcher from Birla Institute of Technology and Science. The author has contributed to research in topics: Software as a service & Software system. The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 125 publications receiving 2048 citations. Previous affiliations of Santonu Sarkar include Jadavpur University & Accenture.
Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
The social network of software engineering research
TL;DR: This paper examines the collaboration networks based on co-authorship information of papers from ten software engineering publication venues over the 1976-2010 time period and investigates whether software engineering collaboration networks manifest symptoms of the small-world phenomenon, conform to the criteria of "social networks", and manifest increasing collaboration with time.
Journal ArticleDOI
DOORS: an object-oriented CAD system for high level synthesis
TL;DR: An automated design and synthesis environment called DOORS has been proposed that can accept a complex system specification at such a high level of abstraction and synthesises the circuit.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Predicting the Impact of Software Engineering Topics: An Empirical Study
TL;DR: It is argued that research topics, rather than individual publications, have wider relevance in the research ecosystem, for individuals as well as organizations.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
CPU Frequency Tuning to Improve Energy Efficiency of MapReduce Systems
TL;DR: This paper characterize the energy efficiency of MapReduce jobs with respect to built-in power governors, and indicates that while a built- in power governor provides the best energy efficiency for a job that is CPU as well as IO intensive, a common CPU-frequency across the cluster provides best the energy Efficiency.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
An Empirical Evaluation of Design Abstraction and Performance of Thrust Framework
TL;DR: This paper has compared the performance of three Thrust applications with their corresponding native versions in CUDA, OpenMP, Xeon-Phi and the CPP backends and shown quantitatively that while it is easier to write an application using Thrust, the framework does not provide any abstraction over the memory hierarchy of the underlying backend to the programmer.