scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Sarat Chandarlapaty

Bio: Sarat Chandarlapaty is an academic researcher from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 50, co-authored 153 publications receiving 12507 citations. Previous affiliations of Sarat Chandarlapaty include University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill & Cornell University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
16 May 2017
TL;DR: OncoKB, a comprehensive and curated precision oncology knowledge base, offers oncologists detailed, evidence-based information about individual somatic mutations and structural alterations present in patient tumors with the goal of supporting optimal treatment decisions.
Abstract: PurposeWith prospective clinical sequencing of tumors emerging as a mainstay in cancer care, an urgent need exists for a clinical support tool that distills the clinical implications associated with specific mutation events into a standardized and easily interpretable format. To this end, we developed OncoKB, an expert-guided precision oncology knowledge base.MethodsOncoKB annotates the biologic and oncogenic effects and prognostic and predictive significance of somatic molecular alterations. Potential treatment implications are stratified by the level of evidence that a specific molecular alteration is predictive of drug response on the basis of US Food and Drug Administration labeling, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, disease-focused expert group recommendations, and scientific literature.ResultsTo date, > 3,000 unique mutations, fusions, and copy number alterations in 418 cancer-associated genes have been annotated. To test the utility of OncoKB, we annotated all genomic events in 5,98...

1,451 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Combined pharmacologic inhibition of PI3K and AR signaling caused near-complete prostate cancer regressions in a Pten-deficient murine prostate cancer model and in human prostate cancer xenografts, indicating that both pathways coordinately support survival.

1,083 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A comprehensive genetic analysis of two independent cohorts of metastatic ER-positive breast tumors and identified mutations in ESR1 affecting the ligand-binding domain (LBD) in 14 of 80 cases that implicate LBD-mutant forms of ER in mediating clinical resistance to hormonal therapy and suggest that more potent ER antagonists may be of substantial therapeutic benefit.
Abstract: Sarat Chandarlapaty and colleagues report the identification of mutations in the ESR1 gene affecting the ligand-binding domain of the encoded estrogen receptor in 20% of metastatic hormone-resistant breast cancers. They determine that the mutant receptor has a hormone-independent active state that likely promotes resistance to estrogen-depriving therapies. Seventy percent of breast cancers express estrogen receptor (ER), and most of these are sensitive to ER inhibition. However, many such tumors for unknown reasons become refractory to inhibition of estrogen action in the metastatic setting. We conducted a comprehensive genetic analysis of two independent cohorts of metastatic ER-positive breast tumors and identified mutations in ESR1 affecting the ligand-binding domain (LBD) in 14 of 80 cases. These included highly recurrent mutations encoding p.Tyr537Ser, p.Tyr537Asn and p.Asp538Gly alterations. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the structures of the Tyr537Ser and Asp538Gly mutants involve hydrogen bonding of the mutant amino acids with Asp351, thus favoring the agonist conformation of the receptor. Consistent with this model, mutant receptors drive ER-dependent transcription and proliferation in the absence of hormone and reduce the efficacy of ER antagonists. These data implicate LBD-mutant forms of ER in mediating clinical resistance to hormonal therapy and suggest that more potent ER antagonists may be of substantial therapeutic benefit.

939 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that AKT inhibition induces the expression and phosphorylation of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and combined inhibition of AKT and HER kinase activity is more effective than either alone alone.

876 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An increased number of alterations in genes involved in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and in the estrogen receptor transcriptional machinery were identified in breast cancers exposed to hormonal therapy and associated with a shorter duration of response to subsequent hormonal therapies.

554 citations


Cited by
More filters
28 Jul 2005
TL;DR: PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、树突状组胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作�ly.
Abstract: 抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1(PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员,通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。

18,940 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
09 Mar 2017-Cell
TL;DR: Recent advances in understanding of mTOR function, regulation, and importance in mammalian physiology are reviewed and how the mTOR signaling network contributes to human disease is highlighted.

4,719 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this paper, the coding exons of the family of 518 protein kinases were sequenced in 210 cancers of diverse histological types to explore the nature of the information that will be derived from cancer genome sequencing.
Abstract: AACR Centennial Conference: Translational Cancer Medicine-- Nov 4-8, 2007; Singapore PL02-05 All cancers are due to abnormalities in DNA. The availability of the human genome sequence has led to the proposal that resequencing of cancer genomes will reveal the full complement of somatic mutations and hence all the cancer genes. To explore the nature of the information that will be derived from cancer genome sequencing we have sequenced the coding exons of the family of 518 protein kinases, ~1.3Mb DNA per cancer sample, in 210 cancers of diverse histological types. Despite the screen being directed toward the coding regions of a gene family that has previously been strongly implicated in oncogenesis, the results indicate that the majority of somatic mutations detected are “passengers”. There is considerable variation in the number and pattern of these mutations between individual cancers, indicating substantial diversity of processes of molecular evolution between cancers. The imprints of exogenous mutagenic exposures, mutagenic treatment regimes and DNA repair defects can all be seen in the distinctive mutational signatures of individual cancers. This systematic mutation screen and others have previously yielded a number of cancer genes that are frequently mutated in one or more cancer types and which are now anticancer drug targets (for example BRAF , PIK3CA , and EGFR ). However, detailed analyses of the data from our screen additionally suggest that there exist a large number of additional “driver” mutations which are distributed across a substantial number of genes. It therefore appears that cells may be able to utilise mutations in a large repertoire of potential cancer genes to acquire the neoplastic phenotype. However, many of these genes are employed only infrequently. These findings may have implications for future anticancer drug development.

2,737 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Dan R. Robinson1, Eliezer M. Van Allen2, Eliezer M. Van Allen3, Yi-Mi Wu1, Nikolaus Schultz4, Robert J. Lonigro1, Juan Miguel Mosquera, Bruce Montgomery5, Mary-Ellen Taplin3, Colin C. Pritchard5, Gerhardt Attard6, Gerhardt Attard7, Himisha Beltran, Wassim Abida4, Robert K. Bradley5, Jake Vinson4, Xuhong Cao1, Pankaj Vats1, Lakshmi P. Kunju1, Maha Hussain1, Felix Y. Feng1, Scott A. Tomlins, Kathleen A. Cooney1, David Smith1, Christine Brennan1, Javed Siddiqui1, Rohit Mehra1, Yu Chen4, Yu Chen8, Dana E. Rathkopf8, Dana E. Rathkopf4, Michael J. Morris8, Michael J. Morris4, Stephen B. Solomon4, Jeremy C. Durack4, Victor E. Reuter4, Anuradha Gopalan4, Jianjiong Gao4, Massimo Loda, Rosina T. Lis3, Michaela Bowden9, Michaela Bowden3, Stephen P. Balk10, Glenn C. Gaviola9, Carrie Sougnez2, Manaswi Gupta2, Evan Y. Yu5, Elahe A. Mostaghel5, Heather H. Cheng5, Hyojeong Mulcahy5, Lawrence D. True11, Stephen R. Plymate5, Heidi Dvinge5, Roberta Ferraldeschi7, Roberta Ferraldeschi6, Penny Flohr7, Penny Flohr6, Susana Miranda7, Susana Miranda6, Zafeiris Zafeiriou6, Zafeiris Zafeiriou7, Nina Tunariu6, Nina Tunariu7, Joaquin Mateo6, Joaquin Mateo7, Raquel Perez-Lopez6, Raquel Perez-Lopez7, Francesca Demichelis12, Francesca Demichelis8, Brian D. Robinson, Marc H. Schiffman8, David M. Nanus, Scott T. Tagawa, Alexandros Sigaras8, Kenneth Eng8, Olivier Elemento8, Andrea Sboner8, Elisabeth I. Heath13, Howard I. Scher8, Howard I. Scher4, Kenneth J. Pienta14, Philip W. Kantoff3, Johann S. de Bono7, Johann S. de Bono6, Mark A. Rubin, Peter S. Nelson, Levi A. Garraway3, Levi A. Garraway2, Charles L. Sawyers4, Arul M. Chinnaiyan 
21 May 2015-Cell
TL;DR: This cohort study provides clinically actionable information that could impact treatment decisions for affected individuals and identified new genomic alterations in PIK3CA/B, R-spondin, BRAF/RAF1, APC, β-catenin, and ZBTB16/PLZF.

2,713 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Peter Bailey1, David K. Chang2, Katia Nones1, Katia Nones3, Amber L. Johns4, Ann-Marie Patch1, Ann-Marie Patch3, Marie-Claude Gingras5, David Miller1, David Miller4, Angelika N. Christ1, Timothy J. C. Bruxner1, Michael C.J. Quinn3, Michael C.J. Quinn1, Craig Nourse1, Craig Nourse2, Murtaugh Lc6, Ivon Harliwong1, Senel Idrisoglu1, Suzanne Manning1, Ehsan Nourbakhsh1, Shivangi Wani1, Shivangi Wani3, J. Lynn Fink1, Oliver Holmes3, Oliver Holmes1, Chin4, Matthew J. Anderson1, Stephen H. Kazakoff1, Stephen H. Kazakoff3, Conrad Leonard3, Conrad Leonard1, Felicity Newell1, Nicola Waddell1, Scott Wood1, Scott Wood3, Qinying Xu3, Qinying Xu1, Peter J. Wilson1, Nicole Cloonan1, Nicole Cloonan3, Karin S. Kassahn7, Karin S. Kassahn1, Karin S. Kassahn8, Darrin Taylor1, Kelly Quek1, Alan J. Robertson1, Lorena Pantano9, Laura Mincarelli2, Luis Navarro Sanchez2, Lisa Evers2, Jianmin Wu4, Mark Pinese4, Mark J. Cowley4, Jones4, Jones2, Emily K. Colvin4, Adnan Nagrial4, Emily S. Humphrey4, Lorraine A. Chantrill10, Lorraine A. Chantrill4, Amanda Mawson4, Jeremy L. Humphris4, Angela Chou4, Angela Chou11, Marina Pajic4, Marina Pajic12, Christopher J. Scarlett13, Christopher J. Scarlett4, Andreia V. Pinho4, Marc Giry-Laterriere4, Ilse Rooman4, Jaswinder S. Samra14, James G. Kench15, James G. Kench4, James G. Kench16, Jessica A. Lovell4, Neil D. Merrett12, Christopher W. Toon4, Krishna Epari17, Nam Q. Nguyen18, Andrew Barbour19, Nikolajs Zeps20, Kim Moran-Jones2, Nigel B. Jamieson2, Janet Graham21, Janet Graham2, Fraser Duthie22, Karin A. Oien4, Karin A. Oien22, Hair J22, Robert Grützmann23, Anirban Maitra24, Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue25, Christopher L. Wolfgang26, Richard A. Morgan26, Rita T. Lawlor, Corbo, Claudio Bassi, Borislav Rusev, Paola Capelli27, Roberto Salvia, Giampaolo Tortora, Debabrata Mukhopadhyay28, Gloria M. Petersen28, Munzy Dm5, William E. Fisher5, Saadia A. Karim, Eshleman26, Ralph H. Hruban26, Christian Pilarsky23, Jennifer P. Morton, Owen J. Sansom2, Aldo Scarpa27, Elizabeth A. Musgrove2, Ulla-Maja Bailey2, Oliver Hofmann9, Oliver Hofmann2, R. L. Sutherland4, David A. Wheeler5, Anthony J. Gill4, Anthony J. Gill15, Richard A. Gibbs5, John V. Pearson1, John V. Pearson3, Andrew V. Biankin, Sean M. Grimmond29, Sean M. Grimmond1, Sean M. Grimmond2 
03 Mar 2016-Nature
TL;DR: Detailed genomic analysis of 456 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas identified 32 recurrently mutated genes that aggregate into 10 pathways: KRAS, TGF-β, WNT, NOTCH, ROBO/SLIT signalling, G1/S transition, SWI-SNF, chromatin modification, DNA repair and RNA processing.
Abstract: Integrated genomic analysis of 456 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas identified 32 recurrently mutated genes that aggregate into 10 pathways: KRAS, TGF-β, WNT, NOTCH, ROBO/SLIT signalling, G1/S transition, SWI-SNF, chromatin modification, DNA repair and RNA processing. Expression analysis defined 4 subtypes: (1) squamous; (2) pancreatic progenitor; (3) immunogenic; and (4) aberrantly differentiated endocrine exocrine (ADEX) that correlate with histopathological characteristics. Squamous tumours are enriched for TP53 and KDM6A mutations, upregulation of the TP63∆N transcriptional network, hypermethylation of pancreatic endodermal cell-fate determining genes and have a poor prognosis. Pancreatic progenitor tumours preferentially express genes involved in early pancreatic development (FOXA2/3, PDX1 and MNX1). ADEX tumours displayed upregulation of genes that regulate networks involved in KRAS activation, exocrine (NR5A2 and RBPJL), and endocrine differentiation (NEUROD1 and NKX2-2). Immunogenic tumours contained upregulated immune networks including pathways involved in acquired immune suppression. These data infer differences in the molecular evolution of pancreatic cancer subtypes and identify opportunities for therapeutic development.

2,443 citations