Author
Seok Junhee Seok
Bio: Seok Junhee Seok is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 2189 citations.
Papers
More filters
••
Stanford University1, Harvard University2, University of Florida3, University of Washington4, University of Texas Medical Branch5, University of Colorado Denver6, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center7, University of Rochester8, University of Pittsburgh9, University of Toronto10, University of California, San Francisco11, Loyola University Chicago12, Washington University in St. Louis13, Rutgers University14
TL;DR: This study shows that, although acute inflammatory stresses from different etiologies result in highly similar genomic responses in humans, the responses in corresponding mouse models correlate poorly with the human conditions and also, one another.
Abstract: A cornerstone of modern biomedical research is the use of mouse models to explore basic pathophysiological mechanisms, evaluate new therapeutic approaches, and make go or no-go decisions to carry new drug candidates forward into clinical trials. Systematic studies evaluating how well murine models mimic human inflammatory diseases are nonexistent. Here, we show that, although acute inflammatory stresses from different etiologies result in highly similar genomic responses in humans, the responses in corresponding mouse models correlate poorly with the human conditions and also, one another. Among genes changed significantly in humans, the murine orthologs are close to random in matching their human counterparts (e.g., R2 between 0.0 and 0.1). In addition to improvements in the current animal model systems, our study supports higher priority for translational medical research to focus on the more complex human conditions rather than relying on mouse models to study human inflammatory diseases.
2,438 citations
Cited by
More filters
••
TL;DR: A review of the basis, diagnosis, and current treatment of Sepsis in patients with this disorder is examined.
Abstract: Morbidity and mortality from sepsis remains unacceptably high. Large variability in clinical practice, plus the increasing awareness that certain processes of care associated with improved critical...
2,927 citations
••
TL;DR: Biomarker-guided immunotherapy that is administered to patients at the proper immune phase of sepsis is potentially a major advance in the treatment of septicaemia and in the field of infectious disease.
Abstract: Sepsis - which is a severe life-threatening infection with organ dysfunction - initiates a complex interplay of host pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory processes. Sepsis can be considered a race to the death between the pathogens and the host immune system, and it is the proper balance between the often competing pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways that determines the fate of the individual. Although the field of sepsis research has witnessed the failure of many highly touted clinical trials, a better understanding of the pathophysiological basis of the disorder and the mechanisms responsible for the associated pro- and anti-inflammatory responses provides a novel approach for treating this highly lethal condition. Biomarker-guided immunotherapy that is administered to patients at the proper immune phase of sepsis is potentially a major advance in the treatment of sepsis and in the field of infectious disease.
1,719 citations
••
University of California, San Diego1, Pennsylvania State University2, Stanford University3, University of Washington4, University of Michigan5, Florida State University6, New College of Florida7, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory8, California Institute of Technology9, University of Vienna10, Emory University11, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center12, Massachusetts Institute of Technology13, Broad Institute14, University of California, Irvine15, University of California, Santa Cruz16, University of California, San Francisco17, Yale University18, University of Florida19, Johns Hopkins University20, University College London21, University of Oxford22, Cornell University23, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center24, Harvard University25, University of Iowa26, Yeshiva University27, University of Pennsylvania28, Washington University in St. Louis29, National Institutes of Health30, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill31
TL;DR: The mouse ENCODE Consortium has mapped transcription, DNase I hypersensitivity, transcription factor binding, chromatin modifications and replication domains throughout the mouse genome in diverse cell and tissue types as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The laboratory mouse shares the majority of its protein-coding genes with humans, making it the premier model organism in biomedical research, yet the two mammals differ in significant ways To gain greater insights into both shared and species-specific transcriptional and cellular regulatory programs in the mouse, the Mouse ENCODE Consortium has mapped transcription, DNase I hypersensitivity, transcription factor binding, chromatin modifications and replication domains throughout the mouse genome in diverse cell and tissue types By comparing with the human genome, we not only confirm substantial conservation in the newly annotated potential functional sequences, but also find a large degree of divergence of sequences involved in transcriptional regulation, chromatin state and higher order chromatin organization Our results illuminate the wide range of evolutionary forces acting on genes and their regulatory regions, and provide a general resource for research into mammalian biology and mechanisms of human diseases
1,335 citations
20 Nov 2014
TL;DR: The laboratory mouse shares the majority of its protein-coding genes with humans, making it the premier model organism in biomedical research, yet the two mammals differ in significant ways.
Abstract: © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.The laboratory mouse shares the majority of its protein-coding genes with humans, making it the premier model organism in biomedical research, yet the two mammals differ in significant ways. To gain
1,020 citations
••
TL;DR: A comprehensive longitudinal review of AstraZeneca's small-molecule drug projects from 2005 to 2010 allowed us to establish a framework based on the five most important technical determinants of project success and pipeline quality, which are described as the five 'R's'.
Abstract: Maintaining research and development (R&D) productivity at a sustainable level is one of the main challenges currently facing the pharmaceutical industry. In this article, we discuss the results of a comprehensive longitudinal review of AstraZeneca's small-molecule drug projects from 2005 to 2010. The analysis allowed us to establish a framework based on the five most important technical determinants of project success and pipeline quality, which we describe as the five 'R's: the right target, the right patient, the right tissue, the right safety and the right commercial potential. A sixth factor - the right culture - is also crucial in encouraging effective decision-making based on these technical determinants. AstraZeneca is currently applying this framework to guide its R&D teams, and although it is too early to demonstrate whether this has improved the company's R&D productivity, we present our data and analysis here in the hope that it may assist the industry overall in addressing this key challenge.
1,003 citations