scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Serena Villata

Bio: Serena Villata is an academic researcher from Centre national de la recherche scientifique. The author has contributed to research in topics: Argumentation theory & Semantic Web. The author has an hindex of 28, co-authored 196 publications receiving 2814 citations. Previous affiliations of Serena Villata include French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation & University of Turin.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recent developments in the field of computational models of argument are leading to technology for artificial argumentation, in the legal, medical, and e-government domains, and interesting tools for argument mining, for debating technologies, and for argumentation solvers are emerging.
Abstract: The field of computational models of argument is emerging as an important aspect of artificial intelligence research. The reason for this is based on the recognition that if we are to develop robust intelligent systems, then it is imperative that they can handle incomplete and inconsistent information in a way that somehow emulates the way humans tackle such a complex task. And one of the key ways that humans do this is to use argumentation either internally, by evaluating arguments and counterarguments‚ or externally, by for instance entering into a discussion or debate where arguments are exchanged. As we report in this review, recent developments in the field are leading to technology for artificial argumentation, in the legal, medical, and e-government domains, and interesting tools for argument mining, for debating technologies, and for argumentation solvers are emerging.

157 citations

Proceedings Article
08 Jul 2012
TL;DR: This paper combines textual entailment with argumentation theory to automatically extract the arguments from debates and to evaluate their acceptability.
Abstract: Blogs and forums are widely adopted by online communities to debate about various issues. However, a user that wants to cut in on a debate may experience some difficulties in extracting the current accepted positions, and can be discouraged from interacting through these applications. In our paper, we combine textual entailment with argumentation theory to automatically extract the arguments from debates and to evaluate their acceptability.

133 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
13 Jul 2018
TL;DR: This paper presents the argument mining tasks, and the obtained results in the area from a data-driven perspective, and highlights the main weaknesses suffered by the existing work in the literature, and proposes open challenges to be faced in the future.
Abstract: Argument mining is the research area aiming at extracting natural language arguments and their relations from text, with the final goal of providing machine-processable structured data for computational models of argument. This research topic has started to attract the attention of a small community of researchers around 2014, and it is nowadays counted as one of the most promising research areas in Artificial Intelligence in terms of growing of the community, funded projects, and involvement of companies. In this paper, we present the argument mining tasks, and we discuss the obtained results in the area from a data-driven perspective. An open discussion highlights the main weaknesses suffered by the existing work in the literature, and proposes open challenges to be faced in the future.

127 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
05 Aug 2010
TL;DR: This paper considers the “lost of admissibility” in Dung's sense and the definition of notions of attack in the context of a support relation, and shows how to prevent these drawbacks by introducing support meta-arguments.
Abstract: In this paper, we consider two drawbacks of Cayrol and Lagasque-Schiex's meta-argumentation theory to model bipolar argumentation frameworks. We consider first the “lost of admissibility” in Dung's sense and second, the definition of notions of attack in the context of a support relation. We show how to prevent these drawbacks by introducing support meta-arguments. Like the model of Cayrol and Lagasque-Schiex, our formalization confirms the use of meta-argumentation to reuse Dung's properties. We do not take a stance towards the usefulness of a support relation among arguments, though we show that if one would like to introduce them, it can be done without extending Dung's theory. Finally, we show how to use meta-argumentation to instantiate an argumentation framework to represent defeasible support. In this model of support, the support relation itself can be attacked.

119 citations

Proceedings Article
23 Jul 2012
TL;DR: Datalift, a framework and a platform helping to lift raw data sources to semantic interlinked data sources, is presented.
Abstract: As many cities around the world provide access to raw public data along the Open Data movement, many questions arise concerning the accessibility of these data. Various data formats, duplicate identifiers, heterogeneous metadata schema descriptions, and diverse means to access or query the data exist. These factors make it difficult for consumers to reuse and integrate data sources to develop innovative applications. The Semantic Web provides a global solution to these problems by providing languages and protocols for describing and accessing datasets. This paper presents Datalift, a framework and a platform helping to lift raw data sources to semantic interlinked data sources.

108 citations


Cited by
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
22 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Some of the major results in random graphs and some of the more challenging open problems are reviewed, including those related to the WWW.
Abstract: We will review some of the major results in random graphs and some of the more challenging open problems. We will cover algorithmic and structural questions. We will touch on newer models, including those related to the WWW.

7,116 citations

01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: The the uses of argument is universally compatible with any devices to read, and is available in the digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can download it instantly.
Abstract: Thank you very much for downloading the uses of argument. Maybe you have knowledge that, people have search numerous times for their chosen novels like this the uses of argument, but end up in infectious downloads. Rather than reading a good book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, instead they juggled with some malicious bugs inside their computer. the uses of argument is available in our digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can download it instantly. Our digital library hosts in multiple locations, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of our books like this one. Merely said, the the uses of argument is universally compatible with any devices to read.

1,180 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The historical events that lead to the interweaving of data and knowledge are tracked to help improve knowledge and understanding of the world around us.
Abstract: In this paper we provide a comprehensive introduction to knowledge graphs, which have recently garnered significant attention from both industry and academia in scenarios that require exploiting diverse, dynamic, large-scale collections of data. After some opening remarks, we motivate and contrast various graph-based data models and query languages that are used for knowledge graphs. We discuss the roles of schema, identity, and context in knowledge graphs. We explain how knowledge can be represented and extracted using a combination of deductive and inductive techniques. We summarise methods for the creation, enrichment, quality assessment, refinement, and publication of knowledge graphs. We provide an overview of prominent open knowledge graphs and enterprise knowledge graphs, their applications, and how they use the aforementioned techniques. We conclude with high-level future research directions for knowledge graphs.

560 citations