scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Seth R. Bauer

Other affiliations: University of Sydney
Bio: Seth R. Bauer is an academic researcher from Cleveland Clinic. The author has contributed to research in topics: Septic shock & Vasopressin. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 99 publications receiving 1059 citations. Previous affiliations of Seth R. Bauer include University of Sydney.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Higher colistin dose independently predicted microbiological success, which may partially explain the similar association with 7-day mortality, however, higher colistIn doses may also precipitate worsening renal function.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Colistin is increasingly used for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections. However, colistin dosing varies greatly and the optimal regimen is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if colistin dosing correlates with patient outcomes. METHODS This retrospective study included patients with gram-negative bacteremia treated with intravenous colistin for at least 72 hours. The primary objective was to determine if colistin dose (mg of colistin base activity/kg/day) independently predicts day-7 microbiological success. Secondary objectives included evaluation for an association between colistin dose and 7-day mortality, 28-day mortality, and the development of acute kidney insufficiency (AKI). RESULTS Seventy-six patients were included in the analysis, with 52 patients (68%) achieving 7-day microbiological success. The median colistin dose was significantly higher in patients who achieved microbiological success (2.9 vs 1.5 mg/kg/day; P = .011). After adjusting for baseline severity of illness and concomitant tigecyline use, higher colistin dose independently correlated with microbiological success (adjusted odds ratio per 1 mg/kg/day = 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.71; P = .015). The median colistin dose was also significantly higher among survivors at day 7 (2.7 vs 1.5 mg/kg/day; P = .007). However, no difference was observed in colistin dose when comparing survivors and nonsurvivors at day 28. A significantly higher colistin dose was given to patients who developed AKI during therapy (3.8 vs 1.6 mg/kg/day; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Higher colistin dose independently predicted microbiological success, which may partially explain the similar association with 7-day mortality. However, higher colistin doses may also precipitate worsening renal function.

93 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is significant patient to patient variability in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy and many patients did not achieve pharmacodynamic targets, suggesting that therapeutic drug monitoring might optimize therapy.
Abstract: Summary Background and objectives Current recommendations for piperacillin-tazobactam dosing in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy originate from studies with relatively few patients and lower continuous renal replacement therapy doses than commonly used today. This study measured the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of piperacillin-tazobactam in patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy using contemporary equipment and prescriptions. Design,setting,participants,&measurementsAmulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudyintheintensivecare units of two academic medical centers was performed, enrolling patients with AKI or ESRD receiving piperacillin-tazobactam while being treated with continuous renal replacement therapy. Pregnant women, children, and patients with end stage liver disease were excluded from enrollment. Plasma and continuous renal replacement therapy effluent samples were analyzed for piperacillin and tazobactam levels using HPLC. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were calculated using standard equations. Multivariate analyses were used to examine the association of patient and continuous renal replacement therapy characteristics with piperacillin pharmacokinetic parameters. ResultsForty-twoof fifty-fivesubjectsenrolledhad complete sampling.Volumeofdistribution (median=0.38 L/kg, intraquartile range=0.20 L/kg)andeliminationrateconstants (median=0.104h 21 ,intraquartile range=0.052h 21 ) were highly variable, and clinical parameters could explain only a small fraction of the large variability in pharmacokineticparameters.Probabilityoftargetattainmentforpiperacillinwas83%fortotaldrugbutonly77% when the unbound fraction was considered. ConclusionsThere is significant patient to patient variability in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Many patients did not achieve pharmacodynamic targets, suggesting that therapeutic drug monitoring might optimize therapy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 452–457, 2012. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10741011

74 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evaluating the effect of procalcitonin-guided strategies in different phases of antibiotics use in critically ill patients found no difference in short-term mortality, but when only examining proCalciton in-guided cessation of antibiotics, lower mortality was detected.
Abstract: Objective:Numerous studies have evaluated the use of procalcitonin guidance during different phases of antibiotics management (initiation, cessation, or a combination of both) in patients admitted to ICUs. Several meta-analyses have attempted to generate an overall effect of procalcitonin-guidance o

59 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: 45% responded to the addition of vasopressin with improved outcomes compared to non-responders, and factors not associated with response included APACHE III score, SOFA score, corticosteroid use, and catecholamine dose.
Abstract: Vasopressin is often utilized for hemodynamic support in patients with septic shock. However, the most appropriate patient to initiate therapy in is unknown. This study was conducted to determine factors associated with hemodynamic response to fixed-dose vasopressin in patients with septic shock. Single-center, retrospective cohort of patients receiving fixed-dose vasopressin for septic shock for at least 6 h with concomitant catecholamines in the medical, surgical, or neurosciences intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary care center. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders to fixed-dose vasopressin. Response was defined as a decrease in catecholamine dose requirements and achievement of mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg at 6 h after initiation of vasopressin. A total of 938 patients were included: 426 responders (45%), 512 non-responders (55%). Responders had lower rates of in-hospital (57 vs. 72%; P < 0.001) and ICU mortality (50 vs. 68%; P < 0.001), and increased ICU-free days at day 14 and hospital-free days at day 28 (2.3 ± 3.8 vs. 1.6 ± 3.3; P < 0.001 and 4.2 ± 7.2 vs. 2.8 ± 6.0; P < 0.001, respectively). On multivariable analysis, non-medical ICU location was associated with increased response odds (OR 1.70; P = 0.0049) and lactate at vasopressin initiation was associated with decreased response odds (OR 0.93; P = 0.0003). Factors not associated with response included APACHE III score, SOFA score, corticosteroid use, and catecholamine dose. In this evaluation, 45% responded to the addition of vasopressin with improved outcomes compared to non-responders. The only factors found to be associated with vasopressin response were ICU location and lactate concentration.

59 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors outline the biologic plausibility, applicable clinical data, and potential role of each agents intended to supplement dietary intake or endogenous molecules in preventing or treating COVID-19.
Abstract: Several agents intended to supplement dietary intake or endogenous molecules may have a theoretical role in preventing or treating COVID-19. Because of their potential to influence immune response, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), zinc, vitamin D, and N-acetylcysteine have been hypothesized to be useful for prevention or treatment of COVID-19. The authors outline the biologic plausibility, applicable clinical data, and potential role of each of these agents.

49 citations


Cited by
More filters
01 Mar 2007
TL;DR: An initiative to develop uniform standards for defining and classifying AKI and to establish a forum for multidisciplinary interaction to improve care for patients with or at risk for AKI is described.
Abstract: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complex disorder for which currently there is no accepted definition. Having a uniform standard for diagnosing and classifying AKI would enhance our ability to manage these patients. Future clinical and translational research in AKI will require collaborative networks of investigators drawn from various disciplines, dissemination of information via multidisciplinary joint conferences and publications, and improved translation of knowledge from pre-clinical research. We describe an initiative to develop uniform standards for defining and classifying AKI and to establish a forum for multidisciplinary interaction to improve care for patients with or at risk for AKI. Members representing key societies in critical care and nephrology along with additional experts in adult and pediatric AKI participated in a two day conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, in September 2005 and were assigned to one of three workgroups. Each group's discussions formed the basis for draft recommendations that were later refined and improved during discussion with the larger group. Dissenting opinions were also noted. The final draft recommendations were circulated to all participants and subsequently agreed upon as the consensus recommendations for this report. Participating societies endorsed the recommendations and agreed to help disseminate the results. The term AKI is proposed to represent the entire spectrum of acute renal failure. Diagnostic criteria for AKI are proposed based on acute alterations in serum creatinine or urine output. A staging system for AKI which reflects quantitative changes in serum creatinine and urine output has been developed. We describe the formation of a multidisciplinary collaborative network focused on AKI. We have proposed uniform standards for diagnosing and classifying AKI which will need to be validated in future studies. The Acute Kidney Injury Network offers a mechanism for proceeding with efforts to improve patient outcomes.

5,467 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 May 1981
TL;DR: This chapter discusses Detecting Influential Observations and Outliers, a method for assessing Collinearity, and its applications in medicine and science.
Abstract: 1. Introduction and Overview. 2. Detecting Influential Observations and Outliers. 3. Detecting and Assessing Collinearity. 4. Applications and Remedies. 5. Research Issues and Directions for Extensions. Bibliography. Author Index. Subject Index.

4,948 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.
Abstract: To provide an update to “Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012”. A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development. The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable. The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions. Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.

4,303 citations

01 Sep 2008
TL;DR: The Methodology used to Prepare the Guideline Epidemiology Incidence Etiology and Recommendations for Assessing Response to Therapy Suggested Performance Indicators is summarized.
Abstract: Executive Summary Introduction Methodology Used to Prepare the Guideline Epidemiology Incidence Etiology Major Epidemiologic Points Pathogenesis Major Points for Pathogenesis Modifiable Risk Factors Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation Aspiration, Body Position, and Enteral Feeding Modulation of Colonization: Oral Antiseptics and Antibiotics Stress Bleeding Prophylaxis, Transfusion, and Glucose Control Major Points and Recommendations for Modifiable Risk Factors Diagnostic Testing Major Points and Recommendations for Diagnosis Diagnostic Strategies and Approaches Clinical Strategy Bacteriologic Strategy Recommended Diagnostic Strategy Major Points and Recommendations for Comparing Diagnostic Strategies Antibiotic Treatment of Hospital-acquired Pneumonia General Approach Initial Empiric Antibiotic Therapy Appropriate Antibiotic Selection and Adequate Dosing Local Instillation and Aerosolized Antibiotics Combination versus Monotherapy Duration of Therapy Major Points and Recommendations for Optimal Antibiotic Therapy Specific Antibiotic Regimens Antibiotic Heterogeneity and Antibiotic Cycling Response to Therapy Modification of Empiric Antibiotic Regimens Defining the Normal Pattern of Resolution Reasons for Deterioration or Nonresolution Evaluation of the Nonresponding Patient Major Points and Recommendations for Assessing Response to Therapy Suggested Performance Indicators

2,961 citations