scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Seyla Benhabib

Bio: Seyla Benhabib is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Democracy. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 2101 citations.
Topics: Democracy

Papers
More filters

Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of the literature shows that there are a growing number of publications from various disciplines that propose a politicized concept of corporate social responsibility as mentioned in this paper, and that many business firms have started to assume social and political responsibilities that go beyond legal requirements and fill the regulatory vacuum in global governance.
Abstract: Scholars in management and economics widely share the assumption that business firms focus on profits only, while it is the task of the state system to provide public goods. In this view business firms are conceived of as economic actors, and governments and their state agencies are considered the only political actors. We suggest that, under the conditions of globalization, the strict division of labour between private business and nation-state governance does not hold any more. Many business firms have started to assume social and political responsibilities that go beyond legal requirements and fill the regulatory vacuum in global governance. Our review of the literature shows that there are a growing number of publications from various disciplines that propose a politicized concept of corporate social responsibility. We consider the implications of this new perspective for theorizing about the business firm, governance, and democracy.

1,570 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article proposed a new approach, based on Jurgen Habermas's theory of democracy, and defined the new role of the business firm as a political actor in a globalizing society.
Abstract: We review two important schools within business and society research, which we label positivist and postpositivist corporate social responsibility (CSR). The former is criticized because of its instrumentalism and normative vacuity and the latter because of its relativism, foundationalism, and utopianism. We propose a new approach, based on Jurgen Habermas's theory of democracy, and we define the new role of the business firm as a political actor in a globalizing society.

1,227 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although empirical studies of deliberative democracy have proliferated in the past decade, too few have addressed the questions that are most significant in the normative theories as mentioned in this paper, and many theorists have tended too easily to dismiss the empirical findings.
Abstract: Although empirical studies of deliberative democracy have proliferated in the past decade, too few have addressed the questions that are most significant in the normative theories. At the same time, many theorists have tended too easily to dismiss the empirical findings. More recently, some theorists and empiricists have been paying more attention to each other's work. Nevertheless, neither is likely to produce the more comprehensive understanding of deliberative democracy we need unless both develop a clearer conception of the elements of deliberation, the conflicts among those elements, and the structural relationships in deliberative systems.

742 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors review recent innovations within democratic theory, focusing especially on problems of fairness, constituency definition, deliberative political judgment, and new, nonelectoral forms of representation.
Abstract: Democratic theorists have paid increasing attention to problems of political representation over the past two decades. Interest is driven by (a) a political landscape within which electoral representation now competes with new and informal kinds of representation; (b) interest in the fairness of electoral representation, particularly for minorities and women; (c) a renewed focus on political judgment within democratic theory; and (d) a new appreciation that participation and representation are complementary forms of citizenship. We review recent innovations within democratic theory, focusing especially on problems of fairness, constituency definition, deliberative political judgment, and new, nonelectoral forms of representation.

595 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that self-interest, suitably constrained, should be part of the deliberation that eventuates in a democratic decision, and argue for a complementary rather than antagonistic relation of deliberation to many democratic mechanisms that are not themselves deliberative.
Abstract: DELIBERATIVE democracy has traditionally been defined in opposition to self-interest, to bargaining and negotiation, to voting, and to the use of power. Our assessment differs in two ways from the traditional one. First, we contend that self-interest, suitably constrained, ought to be part of the deliberation that eventuates in a democratic decision. Indeed, some forms of negotiation involving self-interest meet all of our criteria for ideal deliberation, in particular the criterion that in their ideal form deliberative methods eschew coercive power. We thus include such constrained self-interest and these forms of negotiation in our reformulation of the deliberative ideal, that is, the regulative standard to which real deliberations should aspire. Second, we argue for a complementary rather than antagonistic relation of deliberation to many democratic mechanisms that are not themselves deliberative. These nondeliberative mechanisms, such as aggregation through voting as well as fair bargaining and negotiation among cooperative antagonists, involve coercive power in their mechanisms of decision. Yet they can and must be justified deliberatively. Our ideal polity is diverse and plural. Its members both strive for

577 citations