scispace - formally typeset
S

Sheena Reilly

Researcher at Griffith University

Publications -  246
Citations -  9312

Sheena Reilly is an academic researcher from Griffith University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Language development. The author has an hindex of 52, co-authored 233 publications receiving 8061 citations. Previous affiliations of Sheena Reilly include Royal Children's Hospital & Great Ormond Street Hospital.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Prevalence of feeding problems and oral motor dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy: A community survey☆☆☆★

TL;DR: In this paper, the prevalence and nature of feeding difficulties and oral motor dysfunction among a representative sample of 49 children with cerebral palsy (12 to 72 months of age) were determined using a population survey by means of a combination of interview and home observational measures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting language outcomes at 4 years of age: findings from Early Language in Victoria Study

TL;DR: Measures of social disadvantage helped explain more variation in outcomes at 4 years than at 2 years, but ability to predict low language status and SLI status remained limited.
Journal ArticleDOI

Early treatment with parenteral penicillin in meningococcal disease.

TL;DR: General practitioners should carry benzylpenicillin in their emergency bags at all times and should administer it promptly, preferably intravenously, whenever meningococcal disease is suspected, unless the patient has had an anaphylactic reaction to penicillin.
Journal ArticleDOI

Specific language impairment: a convenient label for whom?

TL;DR: It is argued there is no empirical evidence to support the continued use of the term SLI and limited evidence that it has provided any real benefits for children and their families, and an international consensus panel is proposed to develop an agreed definition and set of criteria for language impairment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting language at 2 years of age: a prospective community study.

TL;DR: These early risk factors explained no more than 7% of the variation in language at 24 months, and seem unlikely to be helpful in screening for early language delay.