Si-Huei Lee

Bio: Si-Huei Lee is an academic researcher from Taipei Veterans General Hospital. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 3 citations.

Improve elderly people's sit-to-stand ability by using new designed additional armrests attaching on the standard walker

Abstract: Background More and more elderly problems come to our life and the elderly health care become more important. Elderly people with lower extremities weakness usually use walkers to assist in walking. Although the commercial standard walkers (N-type) can improve elderly people's walking ability, users sometimes take risk of falling when using the standard walkers to perform sit-to-stand (STS). The purpose of this study is to design an additional armrest which can be attached to a standard walker for users performing STS more easily and evaluate it with clinical assessments and a body worn sensor. Methods The combination of the walker and the new armrest design are referred to as a better type (B-type). Clinical assessments and a motion analysis were performed on 34 elderly people (age, 83 ± 6 y/o) with a Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST), a satisfaction survey and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) attached to the trunk to measure the acceleration data when using B-type and N-type during STS. Results The FTSST result shows that the B-type can reduce about 5 s spending time of elderly people during STS and 63.7% of subjects were more satisfied on the B-type than the N-type. According to the IMU, the result reveals that the B-type can provide subjects higher peak–peak anterio-posterior acceleration, peak flexion acceleration and peak extension acceleration during STS. Conclusion There is a better assistance during STS when using our new armrests design combined with the commercial product which could provide larger acceleration to perform sit-to-stand.

What is the optimal chair stand test protocol for older adults? A systematic review.

Abstract: Purpose: To determine the chair stand test protocol that is most suitable for older adults in clinical settings by reviewing the currently available methods.Methods: Five electronic English databases were searched and details of methods used on individuals aged ≥65 years in the included studies were compared, including the instrument used to record time, units of measurement, chair characteristics (seat height, armrests), footwear, permission to use upper extremities and walking aids, pace of performance, total number of chair stands, timing points, total number of recorded and practice tests.Results: A total of 23 eligible studies were identified. The type of instrument to record performance time, characteristics of the chair and footwear were not frequently mentioned. A majority of studies did not permit the use of the upper extremities or walking aids during assessment. The performance of five chair stands at a fast pace recorded in seconds was most common, with the majority of studies recording the initial and end time point in a seated position. The total number of performed tests and practice tests was not specified in a majority of studies.Conclusion: A feasible and safe protocol for the chair stand test is proposed for assessment of older adults.Implications for RehabilitationThe chair stand test may provide valuable information on declines in mobility in older adults.The use of the chair stand test within clinical settings of older adults may provide a measure to identify frail individuals and to determine their level of frailty.Using the proposed protocol for the chair stand test may allow for the comparability of results.