Silvano Nocentini

Bio: Silvano Nocentini is an academic researcher from Curie Institute. The author has contributed to research in topics: DNA repair & DNA damage. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 29 publications receiving 624 citations.

Rejoining Kinetics of DNA Single- and Double-Strand Breaks in Normal and DNA Ligase-Deficient Cells after Exposure to Ultraviolet C and Gamma Radiation: An Evaluation of Ligating Activities Involved in Different DNA Repair Processes

Abstract: The repair kinetics for rejoining of DNA single- and double-strand breaks after exposure to UVC or gamma radiation was measured in cells with deficiencies in DNA ligase activities and in their normal counterparts. Human 46BR cells were deficient in DNA ligase I. Hamster EM9 and EM-C11 cells were deficient in DNA ligase III activity as a consequence of mutations in the XRCC1 gene. Hamster XR-1 cells had mutation in the XRCC4 gene, whose product stimulates DNA ligase IV activity. DNA single- and double-strand breaks were assessed by the comet assay in alkaline conditions and by the technique of graded-field gel electrophoresis in neutral conditions, respectively. 46BR cells, which are known to re-ligate at a reduced rate the DNA single-strand breaks incurred during processing of damage induced by UVC but not gamma radiation, were shown to have a normal repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks. EM9 cells exhibited a reduced rate of rejoining of DNA single-strand breaks after exposure to ionizing radiation, as reported previously, as well as UVC radiation. EM-C11 cells were deficient in the repair of radiation-induced-DNA single-strand breaks but, in contrast to EM9 cells, demonstrated the same kinetics as the parental cell line in the resealing of DNA breaks resulting from exposure to UVC radiation. Both EM9 and EM-C11 cells displayed a significant defect in rejoining of radiation-induced-DNA double-strand breaks. XR-1 cells were confirmed to be highly deficient in the repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks but appeared to rejoin DNA single-strand breaks after UVC and gamma irradiation at rates close to normal. Taken together these results indicate that: (1) DNA ligase I is involved only in nucleotide excision repair; (2) DNA ligase IV plays an important role only in repair of DNA double-strand breaks; and (3) DNA ligase III is implicated in base excision repair and in repair of DNA double-strand breaks, but probably not in nucleotide excision repair.

Inhibition of DNA replication and repair by cadmium in mammalian cells. Protective interaction of zinc.

Abstract: The effects of the treatment of cultured human and simian cells with Cadmium (Cd), a toxic and carcinogenic metal, were first assayed on macromolecular synthesis. It was observed that DNA synthesis was inhibited by Cd concentrations considerably lower than those inhibiting protein and RNA synthesis. Because of the necessary occurrence of a DNA resynthesis step during the DNA excision repair process, the consequences of the exposure of cells to Cd were ulteriorly tested on different parameters measuring DNA repair after ultraviolet (UV) damage. UV-induced unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) was found 2-3 times lower in Cd (4 X 10(-6) M) treated cells than in control cells for UV doses higher than 10 J/m2. DNA breaks accumulated in UV-irradiated cells during post-exposure incubation in presence of Cd, whereas they were induced only transiently in control cells irradiated with the same dose. Cd inhibited in a concentration-dependent way the recovery of RNA transcription impaired by UV-irradiation. However, at concentrations used, Cd had no significant effects on DNA size and on rRNA synthesis in unirradiated cells. Finally, Cd was shown to inhibit the repair of potentially lethal damage during a 24 h liquid holding and to increase the toxicity of UV-irradiation. The interactions between Cd and Zinc (Zn), an essential metal for many enzymatic proteins, were also analysed. Results showed that Zn, at 5 to 10 times higher concentrations, counteracts the inhibitory effects of Cd on DNA synthesis and restores, at least partially, the repair capability of cells and their survival. The possible molecular level and mechanism of action of these metals are discussed.

Comet Assay Analysis of Repair of DNA Strand Breaks in Normal and Deficient Human Cells Exposed to Radiations and Chemicals. Evidence for a Repair Pathway Specificity of DNA Ligation

Abstract: The induction and resealing of DNA strand breaks in a cell line with a proven defect in DNA ligase I, 46BR, and in two Bloom`s syndrome cell lines. YBL6 and GM 1492, were compared to those observed in normal human 1BR/3 fibroblasts after treatment with a variety of genotoxic agents whose lesions are processed by different repair pathways. This analysis was performed using the single-cell gel electrophoresis assay. The three types of cells were found to have similar capabilities to recognize and incise ultraviolet photoproducts and also demonstrated similar amounts of DNA breaks immediately after {gamma} irradiation. During post-treatment incubation, 46BR cells showed a marked DNA re-ligation defect after ultraviolet radiation damage, GM 1492 cells demonstrated a highly reduced DNA joining ability after relatively high doses of ultraviolet radiation, and YBL6 cells were particularly affected in DNA re-ligation after damage by 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide. The two Bloom`s syndrome cell lines and 46BR cells had a nearly normal ability to reseal breaks resulting from {gamma} irradiation or treatment with xanthine plus xanthine oxidase. These findings suggest that different DNA ligases may be involved in different DNA repair pathways in human cells. 60 refs., 7 figs.

UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review

Abstract: Increases in ultraviolet radiation at the Earth's surface due to the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer have recently fuelled interest in the mechanisms of various effects it might have on organisms. DNA is certainly one of the key targets for UV-induced damage in a variety of organisms ranging from bacteria to humans. UV radiation induces two of the most abundant mutagenic and cytotoxic DNA lesions such as cyclobutane–pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and 6–4 photoproducts (6–4PPs) and their Dewar valence isomers. However, cells have developed a number of repair or tolerance mechanisms to counteract the DNA damage caused by UV or any other stressors. Photoreactivation with the help of the enzyme photolyase is one of the most important and frequently occurring repair mechanisms in a variety of organisms. Excision repair, which can be distinguished into base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER), also plays an important role in DNA repair in several organisms with the help of a number of glycosylases and polymerases, respectively. In addition, mechanisms such as mutagenic repair or dimer bypass, recombinational repair, cell-cycle checkpoints, apoptosis and certain alternative repair pathways are also operative in various organisms. This review deals with UV-induced DNA damage and the associated repair mechanisms as well as methods of detecting DNA damage and its future perspectives.

Quality control by DNA repair.

Abstract: Faithful maintenance of the genome is crucial to the individual and to species. DNA damage arises from both endogenous sources such as water and oxygen and exogenous sources such as sunlight and tobacco smoke. In human cells, base alterations are generally removed by excision repair pathways that counteract the mutagenic effects of DNA lesions. This serves to maintain the integrity of the genetic information, although not all of the pathways are absolutely error-free. In some cases, DNA damage is not repaired but is instead bypassed by specialized DNA polymerases.

Molecular mechanism of nucleotide excision repair

Abstract: From its very beginning, life has faced the fundamental problem that the form in which genetic information is stored is not chemically inert. DNA integrity is challenged by the damaging effect of numerous chemical and physical agents, compromizing its function. To protect this Achilles heel, an intricate network of DNA repair systems has evolved early in evolution. One of these is nucleotide excision repair (NER), a highly versatile and sophisticated DNA damage removal pathway that counteracts the deleterious effects of a multitude of DNA lesions, including major types of damage induced by environmental sources. The most relevant lesions subject to NER are cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and (6-4) photoproducts (6-4PPs), two major kinds of injury produced by the shortwave UV component of sunlight. In addition, numerous bulky chemical adducts are eliminated by this process. Within the divergent spectrum of NER lesions, significant distortion of the DNA helix appears to be a common denominator. Defects in NER underlie the extreme photosensitivity and predisposition to skin cancer observed with the prototype repair syndrome xeroderma pigmentosum (XP). Seven XP complementation groups have been identified, representing distinct repair genes XPA–G (discussed in detail below). In the last decade, all key NER factors have been cloned and the core of the ‘cut-and-paste’ reaction has been reconstituted in vitro from purified components. Recently, XPC (complexed to hHR23B) has been identified as a DNA-damage sensor and repair-recruitment factor. The general transcription factor complex TFIIH, containing the XPB and XPD helicases, mediates strand separation at the site of the lesion. XPA verifies the damage in an open DNA conformation and is crucial in the assembly of the remainder of the repair machinery. Replication protein A (RPA) stabilizes the opened DNA complex and is involved in positioning the XPG and ERCC1–XPF endonucleases responsible for the DNA incisions around the lesion. After removal of the damagecontaining oligonucleotide, typically 24–32 nucleotides in length, general replication factors fill in the remaining gap and close it. Two modes of NER can be distinguished: repair of lesions over the entire genome, referred to as global genome NER (GG–NER), and repair of transcription-blocking lesions present in transcribed DNA strands, hence called transcription-coupled NER (TC–NER). Most XP groups harbor defects in a common component of both NER subpathways. GG–NER is dependent on the activity of all factors mentioned above, including the GG– NER-specific complex XPC–hHR23B. The rate of repair for GG–NER strongly depends on the type of lesion. For instance, 6-4PPs are removed much faster from the genome than CPDs, probably because of differences in affinity of the damage sensor XPC–hHR23B. In addition, the location (accessibility) of a lesion influences the removal rate in vivo. In TC–NER, damage is detected by the elongating RNA polymerase II complex when it encounters a lesion. Interestingly, a distinct disorder, Cockayne syndrome (CS), is associated with a specific defect in transcription-coupled repair. The identification of two complementation groups (CS-A and CS-B) shows that at least two gene products are specifically needed for fast and efficient repair of transcribed strands. Phenotypically, CS is a very pleiotropic condition characterized by photosensitivity as well as severe neurological, developmental, and premature aging features. Most of these symptoms are not seen even with totally NERdeficient XP patients. The additional symptoms of CS suggest that transcription-coupled repair and/or the CS proteins have functions beyond NER. Also, non-NERspecific lesions (such as oxidative damage) that stall transcription elongation appear to be removed in a transcription-coupled fashion, linking a blocked polymerase to multiple repair pathways. Intriguingly, some XP-B, XP-D, and XP-G patients display CS features combined with XP manifestations. Yet other XP-B and XP-D individuals suffer from the CS-like brittle-hair syndrome trichothiodystrophy (TTD). This clinical conundrum points to additional roles of these NER factors as well. A recent mouse model for TTD has linked mutations in the XPD subunit of the dual functional TFIIH complex with deficiencies in basal transcription underlying at least some of the TTD manifestations. Thus, NER defects are associated with a surprisingly wide clinical heterogeneity due to additional functions of the NER factors involved. 1Corresponding author. E-MAIL Hoeijmakers@gen.fgg.eur.nl; FAX 31 10 408 9468.

Flexible nets. The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks.

Abstract: Proteins participate in complex sets of interactions that represent the mechanistic foundation for much of the physiology and function of the cell. These protein-protein interactions are organized into exquisitely complex networks. The architecture of protein-protein interaction networks was recently proposed to be scale-free, with most of the proteins having only one or two connections but with relatively fewer 'hubs' possessing tens, hundreds or more links. The high level of hub connectivity must somehow be reflected in protein structure. What structural quality of hub proteins enables them to interact with large numbers of diverse targets? One possibility would be to employ binding regions that have the ability to bind multiple, structurally diverse partners. This trait can be imparted by the incorporation of intrinsic disorder in one or both partners. To illustrate the value of such contributions, this review examines the roles of intrinsic disorder in protein network architecture. We show that there are three general ways that intrinsic disorder can contribute: First, intrinsic disorder can serve as the structural basis for hub protein promiscuity; secondly, intrinsically disordered proteins can bind to structured hub proteins; and thirdly, intrinsic disorder can provide flexible linkers between functional domains with the linkers enabling mechanisms that facilitate binding diversity. An important research direction will be to determine what fraction of protein-protein interaction in regulatory networks relies on intrinsic disorder.

Molecular Mechanisms of Ultraviolet Radiation-Induced DNA Damage and Repair

Abstract: DNA is one of the prime molecules, and its stability is of utmost importance for proper functioning and existence of all living systems. Genotoxic chemicals and radiations exert adverse effects on genome stability. Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) (mainly UV-B: 280–315 nm) is one of the powerful agents that can alter the normal state of life by inducing a variety of mutagenic and cytotoxic DNA lesions such as cyclobutane-pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), 6-4 photoproducts (6-4PPs), and their Dewar valence isomers as well as DNA strand breaks by interfering the genome integrity. To counteract these lesions, organisms have developed a number of highly conserved repair mechanisms such as photoreactivation, base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), and mismatch repair (MMR). Additionally, double-strand break repair (by homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining), SOS response, cell-cycle checkpoints, and programmed cell death (apoptosis) are also operative in various organisms with the expense of specific gene products. This review deals with UV-induced alterations in DNA and its maintenance by various repair mechanisms.