How to Do Things With Words

The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society

Meanwhile, the authors' antidote to the American sicknessa quest for democratic community that draws on our diverse civic and religious traditionshas contributed to a vigorous scholarly and popular debate. Attention has been focused on forms of social organization, be it civil society, democratic communitarianism, or associative democracy, that can humanize the market and the administrative state. In their new Introduction the authors relate the argument of their book both to the current realities of American society and to the growing debate about the country's future. With this new edition one of the most influential books of recent times takes on a new immediacy.\

Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life

The End of History and the Last Man

In the present paper a research has been done on the essay ‘Can the Subaltern Speak’ by’ Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’. It has been explained into much simpler language about what the author conveys for better understanding and further references. Also the criticism has been done by various critiques from various sources which is helpful from examination point of view. The paper has been divided into various contexts with an introduction and the conclusions. Also the references has been written that depicts the sources of criticism.

/pdf/can-the-subaltern-speak-559i22edvt.pdf

Can the Subaltern Speak

This paper examines the existential ambivalence of human selfhood by drawing upon George Herbert Mead’s distinction between the ‘I’ and the ‘me’. In order to make a case for the centrality of this conceptual distinction, the paper offers a comprehensive account of a variety of different meanings which the notions of the ‘I’ and the ‘me’ are given in Mead’s analysis of the self. The distinction between the ‘I’ and the ‘me’ has been extensively discussed in the literature, but neither supporters nor detractors of Mead’s symbolic interactionism have provided a detailed study of its multifaceted significance for the constitution of selfhood. The paper seeks to demonstrate that Mead’s analytical separation between the ‘I’ and the ‘me’ allows us to shed light on the multilayered ambivalence of the human self, that is, on the existential significance of various opposing forces which pervade every ordinary subject’s relation to the world.

Meadian Reflections on the Existential Ambivalence of Human Selfhood

Luc Boltanski, sociologue, est directeur d’etudes a l’Ecole des hautes etudes en sciences sociales. Ne en 1940, il est l’auteur d’une quinzaine d’ouvrages qui, tout en s’appuyant sur des terrains d’enquete varies – de la puericulture a l’engendrement et l’avortement, en passant par le monde professionnel des cadres, l’humanitaire ou le management — n’en sont pas moins lies par des questions transversales. L’analyse des dispositifs normatifs mobilises par les acteurs pour faire "tenir" la realite sociale ou la mettre en cause fait partie des fils conducteurs de sa sociologie. Si les outils d’analyse qu’il a contribue a forger pour mener ces enquetes ont profondement marque la sociologie de ces vingt dernieres annees, ces outils evoluent plus vite que ce que l’on retient generalement du "tournant pragmatique". Et c’est une trajectoire sociologique tissee de doutes, de remises en cause methodologiques et de petits virages theoriques, que nous livre ici ce sociologue sensible aux bricolages et aux "incertitudes de la vie sociale"

La fragilité de la réalité. Entretien avec Luc Boltanski. Propos recueillis par Juliette Rennes et Simon Susen

Emile Durkheim faced his final challenge in the confrontation with pragmatism. Pragmatism had emerged as an important theoretical approach for the study of both life and action. As argued in this a...

Sociology face to face with pragmatism: Action, concept, and person

Luc Boltanski and His Critics: An Afterword

The following sections shall provide some critical reflections on the key trends, debates, and challenges covered in the preceding chapters. As should be clear from the previous analysis, the present study is not intended to be a demolition exercise. The point of this epilogue, therefore, is not to demonstrate that the sociological approaches scrutinized in the foregoing chapters are doomed to failure. Rather, the point here is to shed light on their main weaknesses and limitations, which―regardless of their respective strengths and contributions―need to be taken into consideration when examining crucial developments in twenty-first-century sociology. As the preceding inquiry has sought to illustrate, the project of creating a sociology capable of accounting for the interconnectedness of social actors and social structures across time and space is far from straightforward. Indeed, the task of constructing a cutting-edge twenty-first-century discipline of this sort is fraught with difficulties. Building on the insights from the previous investigation, this epilogue shall draw attention to the complexities and contradictions inherent in, and to the major challenges arising from, such an ambitious endeavour.

Simon Susen

Papers

Meadian Reflections on the Existential Ambivalence of Human Selfhood

La fragilité de la réalité. Entretien avec Luc Boltanski. Propos recueillis par Juliette Rennes et Simon Susen

Sociology face to face with pragmatism: Action, concept, and person

Luc Boltanski and His Critics: An Afterword

Epilogue: Critical Remarks