scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Sona A. Chikarmane

Bio: Sona A. Chikarmane is an academic researcher from Brigham and Women's Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mammography & Breast cancer. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 45 publications receiving 968 citations. Previous affiliations of Sona A. Chikarmane include Harvard University & Boston Medical Center.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The use, final outcome, and positive biopsy rate of American College of Radiology ultrasonographic (US) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories 3, 4, and 5 recommended for breast masses were evaluated.
Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the use, final outcome, and positive biopsy rate of American College of Radiology ultrasonographic (US) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories 3, 4, and 5 recommended for breast masses. Materials and Methods: At US, consecutive masses, palpable and nonpalpable, categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2004, were retrospectively reviewed with institutional review board approval. Medical records provided imaging and histologic information. Results: After patients lost to follow-up were excluded, the study population was 767 patients with 926 masses (476 palpable, 450 nonpalpable). In BI-RADS 3 masses (n = 356), imaging follow-up of 252 masses documented stability for 6–24 months. Aspiration of 24 masses revealed cysts. Biopsy in 80 masses revealed three malignancies, all of which were diagnosed within 6 months of the index examination, were smaller than 1 cm, and were node negative (negative predictive value = 99.2%). In BI-RADS...

159 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Real‐time tissue elastography may provide additional characterization of breast lesions, improving specificity, particularly for low‐suspicion lesions.
Abstract: Objective The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the performance of real-time tissue elastography (RTE) in the evaluation of breast masses and correlate RTE and American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessments with pathologic findings. Methods Informed consent was obtained from all patients for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, Institutional Review Board-approved study. Patients with sonographically visible breast lesions for which a biopsy was recommended were considered potential study participants. Between October 2006 and February 2008, 186 consecutive women with 200 lesions were enrolled. Twelve lesions in 11 patients were excluded, resulting in a study population of 188 lesions in 175 women. After routine B-mode sonographic examination, RTE was performed using a manual free-hand compression technique. Study lesions were assigned elasticity scores (ES) based on the system proposed by Itoh et al (Radiology 2006; 239:341-350), where 1 is normal and 5 represents abnormal strain. The lesion size on RTE and B-mode imaging was compared. Results were correlated with BI-RADS assessment and pathologic findings. Results Pathologic examination revealed 61 of 188 malignancies (32.4%) and 127 of 188 benign lesions (67.6%). Of the malignant lesions, 84% had ES of 5 and 4, whereas 76% of benign lesions had ES of 1 and 2. The sensitivity of RTE was 92.7%, and specificity was 85.8%, with 4 false-negative and 16 false-positive results. Of the biopsy-proven benign BI-RADS 4A lesions, 63 of 76 (82.9%) had ES of 1 and 2, consistent with normal tissue. Conclusions Real-time tissue elastography may provide additional characterization of breast lesions, improving specificity, particularly for low-suspicion lesions.

139 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a multidisciplinary panel of experts from three of the leading tertiary care cancer centers in the United States developed a set of guidelines for the management of vaccine-associated adenopathy.
Abstract: Vaccination-associated adenopathy is a frequent imaging finding after administration of COVID-19 vaccines that may lead to a diagnostic conundrum in patients with manifest or suspected cancer, in whom it may be indistinguishable from malignant nodal involvement. To help the medical community address this concern in the absence of studies and evidence-based guidelines, this special report offers recommendations developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts from three of the leading tertiary care cancer centers in the United States. According to these recommendations, some routine imaging examinations, such as those for screening, should be scheduled before or at least 6 weeks after the final vaccination dose to allow for any reactive adenopathy to resolve. However, there should be no delay of other clinically indicated imaging (eg, for acute symptoms, short-interval treatment monitoring, urgent treatment planning or complications) due to prior vaccination. The vaccine should be administered on the side contralateral to the primary or suspected cancer, and both doses should be administered in the same arm. Vaccination information-date(s) administered, injection site(s), laterality, and type of vaccine-should be included in every preimaging patient questionnaire, and this information should be made readily available to interpreting radiologists. Clear and effective communication between patients, radiologists, referring physician teams, and the general public should be considered of the highest priority when managing adenopathy in the setting of COVID-19 vaccination.

102 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A pictorial review of the BI-RADS US lexicon descriptors is provided, and specific cases from a retrospective review are used to highlight the challenges in using this lexicon.
Abstract: The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon for ultrasonography (US) is based on the established lexicon used successfully in mammography and attempts to provide a common language to avoid ambiguity in interpreting, reporting, and teaching breast US. Proper and consistent use of the BI-RADS US lexicon has numerous advantages, including facilitating (a) communication of final assessment categories that clearly indicate management recommendations, (b) data tracking for self-audits, and (c) clinical review of outcome summaries. However, the literature to date does not include sufficient data on outcomes to validate clinical use of the BI-RADS US lexicon. In this article, a pictorial review of the BI-RADS US lexicon descriptors is provided, and specific cases from a retrospective review are used to highlight the challenges in using the BI-RADS US lexicon. With these examples, suggestions are offered for greater clarity in the use of this lexicon. The technical challenges in follow-up US imaging are described. The challenges in assigning final assessment categories are detailed, as well as the clinical factors that may influence decision making and the management of certain lesions.

92 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Breast MRI plays an important role in the detection of DCIS, which most often appears as nonmass clumped enhancement, in a ductal or segmental distribution, with variable enhancement kinetics.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to describe and illustrate the variety of common morphologic features, enhancement patterns, and kinetics of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast, using the American College of Radiology BI-RADS lexicon.CONCLUSION. Breast MRI plays an important role in the detection of DCIS, which most often appears as nonmass clumped enhancement, in a ductal or segmental distribution, with variable enhancement kinetics.

63 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This consensus statement is intended to provide guidance regarding the use ofAPBI outside of a clinical trial and to serve as a framework to promote additional clinical investigations into the optimal role of APBI in the treatment of breast cancer.
Abstract: Purpose To present guidance for patients and physicians regarding the use of accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI), based on current published evidence complemented by expert opinion. Methods and Materials A systematic search of the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database yielded 645 candidate original research articles potentially applicable to APBI. Of these, 4 randomized trials and 38 prospective single-arm studies were identified. A Task Force composed of all authors synthesized the published evidence and, through a series of meetings, reached consensus regarding the recommendations contained herein. Results The Task Force proposed three patient groups: ( 1 ) a "suitable" group, for whom APBI outside of a clinical trial is acceptable, ( 2 ) a "cautionary" group, for whom caution and concern should be applied when considering APBI outside of a clinical trial, and ( 3 ) an "unsuitable" group, for whom APBI outside of a clinical trial is not generally considered warranted. Patients who choose treatment with APBI should be informed that whole-breast irradiation (WBI) is an established treatment with a much longer track record that has documented long-term effectiveness and safety. Conclusion Accelerated partial-breast irradiation is a new technology that may ultimately demonstrate long-term effectiveness and safety comparable to that of WBI for selected patients with early breast cancer. This consensus statement is intended to provide guidance regarding the use of APBI outside of a clinical trial and to serve as a framework to promote additional clinical investigations into the optimal role of APBI in the treatment of breast cancer.

834 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology has produced these guidelines for the use of elastography techniques in liver disease, aimed at assessing the usefulness ofElastography in the management of liver diseases.
Abstract: The breast section of these Guidelines and Recommendations for Elastography produced under the auspices of the World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) assesses the clinically used applications of all forms of elastography used in breast imaging. The literature on various breast elastography techniques is reviewed, and recommendations are made on evidence-based results. Practical advice is given on how to perform and interpret breast elastography for optimal results, with emphasis placed on avoiding pitfalls. Artifacts are reviewed, and the clinical utility of some artifacts is discussed. Both strain and shear wave techniques have been shown to be highly accurate in characterizing breast lesions as benign or malignant. The relationship between the various techniques is discussed, and recommended interpretation based on a BI-RADS-like malignancy probability scale is provided. This document is intended to be used as a reference and to guide clinical users in a practical way.

694 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There were significant differences in the elasticity values of benign and malignant masses as well as invasive and intraductal cancers with SWE, suggesting that SWE has the potential to aid in the differentiation of harmless and harmful breast lesions.
Abstract: Shear wave elastography (SWE) is an emerging technique which can obtain quantitative elasticity values in breast disease. We therefore evaluated the diagnostic performance of SWE for the differentiation of breast masses compared with conventional ultrasound (US). Conventional US and SWE were performed by three experienced radiologists for 158 consecutive women who had been scheduled for US-guided core biopsy or surgical excision in 182 breast masses (89 malignancies and 93 benign; mean size, 1.76 cm). For each lesion, quantitative elasticity was measured in terms of the Young’s modulus (in kilopascals, kPa) with SWE, and BI-RADS final categories were assessed with conventional US. The mean elasticity values were significantly higher in malignant masses (153.3 kPa ± 58.1) than in benign masses (46.1 kPa ± 42.9), (P < 0.0001). The average mean elasticity values of invasive ductal (157.5 ± 57.07) or invasive lobular (169.5 ± 61.06) carcinomas were higher than those of ductal carcinoma in situ (117.8 kPa ± 54.72). The average mean value was 49.58 ± 43.51 for fibroadenoma, 35.3 ± 31.2 for fibrocystic changes, 69.5 ± 63.2 for intraductal papilloma, and 149.5 ± 132.4 for adenosis or stromal fibrosis. The optimal cut-off value, yielding the maximal sum of sensitivity and specificity, was 80.17 kPa, and the sensitivity and specificity of SWE were 88.8% (79 of 89) and 84.9% (79 of 93). The area under the ROC curve (Az value) was 0.898 for conventional US, 0.932 for SWE, and 0.982 for combined data. In conclusion, there were significant differences in the elasticity values of benign and malignant masses as well as invasive and intraductal cancers with SWE. Our results suggest that SWE has the potential to aid in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

306 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The history of this lexicon illustrates a series of challenges and instructive successes that provide a valuable guide for other groups that aspire to develop similar lexicons in the future.
Abstract: The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ® (BI-RADS ® ) initiative, instituted by the ACR, was begun in the late 1980s to address a lack of standardization and uniformity in mammography practice reporting. An important component of the BI-RADS initiative is the lexicon, a dictionary of descriptors of specific imaging features. The BI-RADS lexicon has always been data driven, using descriptors that previously had been shown in the literature to be predictive of benign and malignant disease. Once established, the BI-RADS lexicon provided new opportunities for quality assurance, communication, research, and improved patient care. The history of this lexicon illustrates a series of challenges and instructive successes that provide a valuable guide for other groups that aspire to develop similar lexicons in the future.

264 citations